Author Topic: Thrashin' New video (Read 697 times)

Kurt · « **on:** November 17, 2005, 11:00:41 PM »

Gentlemen, My latest video..

I won't claim that its a cinematic masterpiece, but it is a VERY energetic KILL FEST with a deserving sound track. And if past results are a clue, you'll all like this just fine.

After I got done rendering it I couldn't stand to see it in Low-Res so I have posted the high-res original in true 720x480 DV standard... And for those of you that don't have the patience for the RIDICULOUS 242 meg download, I have posted it in reduced resolution at 118 megs.

The names of the dead have been excluded to protect their L337 status :-)

Enjoy! And let me know if you like.

SUPER MEGA LARGE 242 MEG

OR

SOMEWHAT MORE REASONABLE 118 Meg

Kurt · « **Reply #1 on:** November 17, 2005, 11:05:42 PM »

BTW, if you tried to link to the small one and it failed... thats fixed now... my bad.

SkyChimp · « **Reply #2 on:** November 18, 2005, 12:20:50 AM »

Downloin now:)We'll see..

SkyChimp · « **Reply #3 on:** November 18, 2005, 12:33:13 AM »

Not to bad would of been better if it went a lil slower.

(not to be mean or anything ur aims not the best) haha

Mines not the best but it gets er done.

Morpheus · « **Reply #4 on:** November 18, 2005, 12:41:04 AM »

why does everyone always make a remark about someone elses aim?

I liked it Kurt. For the quality of that 100mb film it shoudl have been alot smaller though. Just a rendering thing though. What are you using to edit your film?

I liked the Jet part, and the added gun sounds that came from it.

zorstorer · « **Reply #5 on:** November 18, 2005, 06:01:21 AM »

The slashes are wrong in the link, but downloading now

Kurt · « **Reply #6 on:** November 18, 2005, 08:00:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Morpheus
[B
I liked it Kurt. For the quality of that 100mb film it shoudl have been alot smaller though.[/B]

Thanks all for your comments..

I agree that the size is rather large on even the small render... What Codex do you guys use to get them tight? This was rendered with cinepak codex.

Tonite I'll try to get it into WMV or something and see if I can get the size down a bit.

megadud · « **Reply #7 on:** November 18, 2005, 08:04:33 AM »

that was....THRASHIN'!

Kurt · « **Reply #8 on:** November 18, 2005, 06:56:47 PM »

Ok, what a putz I am!

I'm working with a new video editor and just realized that I wasn't using any real compression video codec... I'm re-rendering now, and will update the files.

outbreak · « **Reply #9 on:** November 18, 2005, 07:17:18 PM »

can makem smaller by Zipping the Files up to.

FiLtH · « **Reply #10 on:** November 19, 2005, 07:20:54 AM »

Whats the song..I mtoo lazy to dl it.

bozon · « **Reply #11 on:** November 19, 2005, 04:22:17 PM »

links don't work

Kermit de frog · « **Reply #12 on:** November 19, 2005, 04:54:15 PM »

Wow, never use Cinepak. That is one old arse codec. Use WMV9 codec. I think it's easier to encode than Divx and plus it's more popular.

viper215 · « **Reply #13 on:** November 19, 2005, 06:22:56 PM »

still does not work for me

Kurt · « **Reply #14 on:** November 19, 2005, 09:40:13 PM »

Guys, I tried to kill this thread and get you pointed at the new one... Sorry for the confusion, I figured the new thread would stay up top, but this one somehow got resurected.

Enjoy.

The new and better compressed file is at

20 Meg