« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked  (Read 2889 times)

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #60 on: November 20, 2005, 08:34:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Simaril
It amazes me how quickly and reliably any discussion turns into a poo-slingling contest.
 



It'll get worse, I promise.;)
Logged
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #61 on: November 20, 2005, 08:39:56 AM »
it is no problem chewing up a zeke in a spit5 right?

Wrong.

Run into the right Zeke pilot and start the fight slow ... the Zeke will clean your clock. If the Spit V out merges the Zeke, it will get one, maybe two clean snapshots, and if you don't finish the Zeke in those circumstances, its all over.

As most have mentioned here ... if the Spit V takes the fight at higher speeds, the Zekes chiity roll rate at high speed will be its undoing. Let the fight get slow and it's advantage Zeke.
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #62 on: November 20, 2005, 08:46:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
I say perk everything reguardless of plane type.
both fighters and bombers
and perk them  by year.

1939-41 = 0 perks
1942-43 = moderately perked
1944-45 = heavily perked


Nah Dred.

UNPERK EVERYTHING except the "Jet".

Think of everything that is perked ... why ? ... with the way that people now fly these days, along with the vast amount of people that are online, along with the plane set that is now available, I fail to believe that ANY plane will dominate the MA.

Remember, all the perking of planes was established back in a day when AH was far different than what we have today. Perking was needed back then ... it is not needed now.

I would love to see HT remove all perks (except for the "Jet") for at least 2 tours and lets see the stats ... I bet they wouldn't be much different that what we see now.

Planes should only be limited by their ENY factor ... not perks.
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #63 on: November 20, 2005, 09:11:06 AM »
What's perked ...

Ar234 - Leave it perked ... its a jet.

F4U-1C ... not the monster it once was, compared to what is available in the hanger these days.

F4U-4 ... not the monster it once was, compared to what is available in the hanger these days.

Me 163B ... leave it perked

Me 262A-1 ... leave it perked

Spit XIV ... not the monster it once was, compared to what is available in the hanger these days. High altitude flyer ... yeah ... lots of fights up there.

Ta 152H-1 ... oooooo ... what a monster !!! Unleash this and the whole MA will fall apart. Everybody will be ditching their current ride for this monster ... NOT !!!

Tempest ... not the monster it once was compare to what is available in the hanger these days.

Any plane that is "not the monster it once, was compared to what is available in the hanger these days" can easily be beaten by some of the newer variants that have been introduced over the past 3 years and could also be easily beaten by some that have been in the stable for years.

There are many more and better pilots in AH than there was when the "perks" were dealt out and for the reasons that they were delt out.

Drop the perks on the C-Hog and you will see C-Hogs everywhere ? I doubt it ... and if it were true ... then you would have alot of C-Hog vs C-Hog and what is wrong with that.

HT ... drop the "perks" and these silly "perk" discussions GO AWAY ... FOREVER !!!
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline zorstorer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 950
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #64 on: November 20, 2005, 10:09:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SlapShot
What's perked ...

Ar234 - Leave it perked ... its a jet.

F4U-1C ... not the monster it once was, compared to what is available in the hanger these days.

F4U-4 ... not the monster it once was, compared to what is available in the hanger these days.

Me 163B ... leave it perked

Me 262A-1 ... leave it perked

Spit XIV ... not the monster it once was, compared to what is available in the hanger these days. High altitude flyer ... yeah ... lots of fights up there.

Ta 152H-1 ... oooooo ... what a monster !!! Unleash this and the whole MA will fall apart. Everybody will be ditching their current ride for this monster ... NOT !!!

Tempest ... not the monster it once was compare to what is available in the hanger these days.

Any plane that is "not the monster it once, was compared to what is available in the hanger these days" can easily be beaten by some of the newer variants that have been introduced over the past 3 years and could also be easily beaten by some that have been in the stable for years.

There are many more and better pilots in AH than there was when the "perks" were dealt out and for the reasons that they were delt out.

Drop the perks on the C-Hog and you will see C-Hogs everywhere ? I doubt it ... and if it were true ... then you would have alot of C-Hog vs C-Hog and what is wrong with that.

HT ... drop the "perks" and these silly "perk" discussions GO AWAY ... FOREVER !!!




Right on Slap!!

I find it doesn't matter what the perk price is for a plane, I fly it differently than a free plane in the roughy the same category.  I have plenty of perks to burn, so it;s not fear of loosing the perks that change my style of flying.  I just don't enjoy having the hoard get infected with the "kil the perk bird" flu.  ;)
Logged

Offline BigR

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 950
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #65 on: November 20, 2005, 01:07:56 PM »
The Tempest is still the best prop plane in the game...bar none. Unperking it would be a big mistake. I do agree that some perked planes should be unperked though.
Logged

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #66 on: November 20, 2005, 03:04:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BigR
The Tempest is still the best prop plane in the game...bar none. Unperking it would be a big mistake. I do agree that some perked planes should be unperked though.


Agreed.

those other planes should be unperked though.

La7 should be added to the perked list
Logged
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #67 on: November 20, 2005, 03:12:36 PM »
Why do people instist on demanding the La7 be perked?  



ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline mechanic

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11327
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #68 on: November 20, 2005, 03:31:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Morpheus


And I dont care what ManeTMP/BluKitty thinks. lolol



hahah, i KNEW it!!!!

i even have a film of Blukitty forcing an overshoot i such a similar style to mane, i labeled the film 'Blukitty=ManeTMP?'

S!! to ManeTMP, one of the best sticks in AH by a mile, he kicks dogdoo out of you morph, or you slapshot. and you know it......

infact...slappy, morph, I'll take you both on in your zekes, me in a spit5, low n slow. we'll see what happens. you name the time and place.



AKAK (and others) your opinions are fair, and called to the spec and stereotypes of these aircraft. what you are not taking into account is that even with equal pilots things are not so set in stone.


dogfighting is an art.
Logged
And I don't know much, but I do know this. With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10224
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #69 on: November 20, 2005, 03:31:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Why do people instist on demanding the La7 be perked?  



ack-ack


Because it has phenomenal range, carries a ton of ord and has the best guns in the game.
Logged
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline mechanic

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11327
spitfires in AH1?
« Reply #70 on: November 20, 2005, 03:32:28 PM »
hahaha, you yourself used to call me spit dweeb for flying a spit9 or 5 in tha AH1 MA.   Soon as you all started flying them in AH2 you changed your mind.


Quote
Originally posted by Morpheus


And I dont care what ManeTMP/BluKitty thinks. lolol



hahah, i KNEW it!!!!

i even have a film of Blukitty forcing an overshoot i such a similar style to mane, i labeled the film 'Blukitty=ManeTMP?'

S!! to ManeTMP, one of the best sticks in AH by a mile, he kicks dogdoo out of you morph, or you slapshot. and you know it......

infact...slappy, morph, I'll take you both on in your zekes, me in a spit5, low n slow. we'll see what happens. you name the time and place.



AKAK (and others) your opinions are fair, and called to the spec and stereotypes of these aircraft. what you are not taking into account is that even with equal pilots things are not so set in stone.


dogfighting is an art.   even with equal painting skills some artists still produce better creativity.
Logged
And I don't know much, but I do know this. With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10224
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #71 on: November 20, 2005, 03:33:48 PM »
Before it was a spit16 now its a 5? LOL.
Logged
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline mechanic

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11327
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #72 on: November 20, 2005, 03:37:46 PM »
fine we can do spit16 first, then spit5.


If you really believe you can win this fight why are you still fighting here and not in the DA?


I'll go there now, and wait 5 mins for you. If you dont turn up this thread is dead for me, GAL.
Logged
And I don't know much, but I do know this. With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #73 on: November 20, 2005, 03:45:11 PM »
are you saying that you are better than both morph and slappy batclown?
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Why I dont think the Spit XVI should be perked
« Reply #74 on: November 20, 2005, 03:56:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Why do people instist on demanding the La7 be perked?  



ack-ack


Because its a rocket ship with photon torpedoes
Logged
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Up
« previous next »