Originally posted by SlapShot
Twist some more ... Yes those men FOUGHT ... FOR ****IN' REAL ... we are discussing gameplay in a virtual online game that has no consequence of death ... stop with the stupidity.
Whether there is an actual, tangible consequence for dying or not should not alter the the definition of accepted fighter combat dogma. Either E-Fighters are able to, by definition, furball turnfighters in the classic sense employing E fighter tactics or they are not, in real life or in the game. Wether the real pilot dies actually and the simulating pilot only dies theoretically should not change the facts. In another thread I quoted the US Navy's definition of a furball, the US military and RAF sure as hell didn't consider it only a furball if their E-Fighters turnfought the enemies' turnfighters. I guess we had better get the US Dept. of Defense on the phone to inform them that according to the mighty Slapshot, Morpheous and Mars, they are incorrect and need to ammend their fighter combat manuals accordingly.
I can just see the WW2 pilots interviewed after a fight, "Well son did you actually turn with the zeke?"
"Well no sir, I used my speed and firepower to bleed his E vertically then killed him as he stalled out."
"I'm sorry to hear that my boy, no kill for you, you didn't actually 'fight' him, had you turned your F4 with the zeke it would have been a real fight and you would have got credit for the kill"
"Sir, that makes me very sad, I killed him using my planes attributes to negate his advantages as I was tought"
"That may be but, you are the 15th F4 pilot I've taken AAR's from and none of you turned with any of those 30 Zekes, that was no furball at all! Cowards!"
Give me a break!
Zazen