Author Topic: Freedom  (Read 1073 times)

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Freedom
« on: December 28, 2001, 04:23:00 AM »
Check this site out and post your thoughts:
 www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
Freedom
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2001, 04:37:00 AM »
404?
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Freedom
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2001, 04:40:00 AM »
I'm guessing that was some kind of error code? Clicked on the site and it went right there!  :confused:

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Freedom
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2001, 08:08:00 AM »
So everything in our country, including our personal posessions and people themselves is owned by a consortium of banks with jewish names.
 That sounds good because if they ever wanted to take posession of their alleged goods, who would they call upon to enforce it? The most formidable fighting power on Earth? Oh, that's right - its us!
 "Genaral Shwartskopf, here are your orders - you are in charge of operation to evict yourself from your house, sell your wife to a bordello and yourself to the salt mines! Execute!"

 Heh, heh...

 miko

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Freedom
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2001, 01:08:00 PM »
Think of this Rocky Mountain National park in Colorado now belongs to the U.N. Bill Clinton sold it, didn't hear a thing about that did ya, ya might wanna look into some of the other things that have been sold!

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Freedom
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2001, 02:13:00 PM »
Please Tyro, enlighten me on how and when this was accomplished by Billy.

Offline Raubvogel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
Freedom
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2001, 02:26:00 PM »
Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
Freedom
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2001, 02:34:00 PM »
Wow.. he's from the Idaho pan-handle... go figure.

AKDejaVu

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Freedom
« Reply #8 on: December 29, 2001, 02:20:00 AM »
heres a site that will give ya clue as to what we have given up:
 www.warroom.com/grab.htm

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Freedom
« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2001, 02:34:00 PM »
Hmmm... Number 13, the Yosemite National Park is controlled by the United Nations?

The World Heritage List is not new and I have a hard time viewing the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization as a bad thing.

Quinn and Rose are cranks.
sand

Offline Tuomio

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 523
Freedom
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2001, 03:20:00 PM »
Just wait when they get their hands on the internet.
I bet theres lots of people sitting on the same table, thinking ways to get the total control over published articles of the net.

You know, internet is todays independent press, you can publish your opinions to the whole world without any filters. Even illegal material, which you will be altough held accountable under the law.
This current situation will not last for long, because you cant control free opinions. Also, knowledge = power and people are getting dangerously (from the govt, umm should i say banks point of view) aware about their real personal rights. It doesent need conspiracy theories to work out that way, it only needs somebody who wants keep his current position on the top.

miko2d: Do you know how army works? Its based on the fact, that you cant express your views to the guy next to you without risking your bellybutton for the marshall law. You know only what youve shown and if they want, they can show you what they want. Ie youre just a sheep amongs the other sheeps, alone youre nothing. You cant raise masses against something without the ability to express your point to them. Try to think any other ways for that than the internet, is there any?

Btw ive been trough the army myself.

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Freedom
« Reply #11 on: December 29, 2001, 03:56:00 PM »
One might ( maybe not ) wonder just how the hell the U.N. could control our land if we are a soverign state, hmmmm maybe we aren't anymore maybe we did go bankrupt between 1928-1930, but what the hell it don't mean nothin, nobody can take anything away from us can they? But not to worry were the United States nobody would dare mess with us
we have a standing ARMY/ Navy/AirForce but wait they're responsible to the U.N. too! Nah nothin can go wrong here, just keep the sand warm.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Freedom
« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2001, 04:48:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tyro48:
One might ( maybe not ) wonder just how the hell the U.N. could control our land if we are a soverign state, hmmmm maybe we aren't anymore maybe we did go bankrupt between 1928-1930, but what the hell it don't mean nothin, nobody can take anything away from us can they? But not to worry were the United States nobody would dare mess with us
we have a standing ARMY/ Navy/AirForce but wait they're responsible to the U.N. too! Nah nothin can go wrong here, just keep the sand warm.

Before I get my panties all in a wad, please explain how UNESCO gives the U.N. control of United States territory.

   
Quote
The World Heritage List was established under terms of The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage adopted in November 1972 at the 17th General Conference of UNESCO.

 The Convention states that a World Heritage Committee "will establish, keep up-to-date and publish" a World Heritage List of cultural and natural properties, submitted by the States Parties and considered to be of outstanding universal value.

 One of the main responsibilities of this Committee is to provide technical co-operation under the World Heritage Fund for the safeguarding of World Heritage properties to States Parties whose resources are insufficient.

 States Parties can request international assistance under the Fund for the preparation of tentative lists and nomination forms, expert missions, training of specialized staff, and supply of equipment when appropriate; they can also apply for long-term loans and, in special cases, non-repayable grants. Requests must concern work necessary for the preservation of cultural or natural sites included in the World Heritage List or assistance to national or regional training centres.

 Emergency assistance is also available under the Fund in the case of properties severely damaged by specific natural or man-made disasters or threatened with imminent destruction.

 As of December 2001, 167 States Parties had ratified the Convention, the United States being the first to do so. As of December 2001, the number of sites on the World Heritage List stood at 721. The Committee named 12 sites in 1978, 45 in 1979, 28 in 1980, 26 in 1981, 24 in 1982, 29 in 1983, 23 in 1984, 30 in 1985, 31 in 1986, 41 in 1987, 27 in 1988, 7 in 1989, 17 in 1990, 22 in 1991, 20 in 1992, 33 in 1993, 29 in 1994, 29 in 1995, 37 in 1996, 46 in 1997, 30 in 1998, 48 in 1999, 61 in 2000, and 31 in 2001.

Help! Help! The sky is falling!

One other thing... I don't see the Rocky Mountain National Park listed on the World Heritage List.

[ 12-29-2001: Message edited by: Sandman_SBM ]
sand

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Freedom
« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2001, 10:40:00 PM »
Rocky Mountain National Park #36 bud.

The U.N. has no business being involved in or on U.S. soil, we had and have done just fine with out them, how ever if you couple this with what is mentioned in the first web site I pointed out you might see a connection, in between 1928-1933 secret meetings were held in Geneva, where the U.S. was declared bankrupt and insolvent, re-read that web site and all the side bars it brings up, look into the footnote supports.

Offline Tyro48

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Freedom
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2001, 11:47:00 PM »
Visit www.cnie.org/NLE/CRS/abstract.cfm?NLEid=16829  to share some of the concerns our own congress had and still has with the U.N. heritage group.

Things always start getting sticky when we start accepting money, it can be easily seen in what our own government has done after supplying aid to other countries you now have a position to start making certain demands, much better we stay out of that on both sides.