Author Topic: Cuban Missile Crisis  (Read 1595 times)

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #15 on: January 04, 2006, 12:22:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by weaselsan
You are right about Kennedy removing the missles from Turkey, but they where added as a sweetner to the deal to allow Kruschev to save face.  


Well, how do you think of an offer "to save face" followed by the requirement not to disclose the agreement about missiles in Turkey?...

Anecdotal things about Carribean crisis (here it's called "Carribean crisis"):

1) When K. visited Bulgaria, he was taken to Turkish border and shown where US missiles are based. He, as usually, went nuts, pulled out a map and said that an equal threat will be sending missiles to Cuba.  I don't know if that US missiles were in European Turkey, but for a mere-mind like K it was enough to understand that Turkey is very-very close to us.

2) It all happened during a K's "missile bluff". People old enough should remember that after Sputnik K declared that R-7 missiles are on conwayor "like sausages", and US leaders believed it. It ended up in SAC bombers on CAP 24/7 over Europe with megatons on board, while we could burn down only a few US areas in a retaliation strike. I don't know exactly how many R-7 launch facilities we had in 1962, but I think we still use all of them for space launches. Also, please, note that US plans of total war against USSR were not a secret.

3) A "missile deal" was a great success of the USSR. As usual, we lost in propaganda field, but we removed a deadly threat to Ukraine and our allies in Eastern Europe. We didn't have a full-scale ABM system even in development by that time, only experiments (like US NMD programm now). OTOH - PVO system was already quite capable, and B-52s invading Soviet airspace could meet some unpleasant surprises. With estimated 50% loss ratio for nuclear bombers projected in early-50s without knowing true PVO capabilities it could mean that B-52s could be nothing more then easy targets. First SAM victory in history happened in October 1959 over China, and US didn't know anything about Soviet SAMs until May Day 1961.

So, we lost an opportunity to retaliate against US attack, but OTOH we removed a vital threat to our cities and guaranteed independance of Cuba, still using it as an "unsinkable carrier" and radio observation base until late-90s.

Some personal things: During that time my Mother's family was on a vacation in GDR, Grandfather was immediately returned to duty, he was a commander of a "portable rocket-technical base". His unit stored nuclear warheads and fuel for operational-tactial missiles (something like "Scud"), he served in Germany in 1957-66 IIRC.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #16 on: January 04, 2006, 12:28:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
By the time they were ordered to be removed, those liquid propelled rockets were already yesterdays technology, no problem in removing them. Boeing was already building the Minute Man 1 system.


In late-60s a Minuteman felt on Cuba (!!!) during a test-launch. When the wreck was delivered to USSR - Soviet engineers literally laughed their tulips off, all they could say was "stone age", IIRC they didn't even use printed circuits.

I have to say that I sell this story for the same price I bought it for. Maybe I have to include it into some kind of "standard disclaimer one"? ;) My Uncle told it to me, since early-70s he served in Priozersk, Kazakhstan, on Soviet ABM systems. He retired in 1990, colonel, commander of "combat software department".

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #17 on: January 04, 2006, 12:32:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Suave
In "Fog of War" McNamara said that when he met with Castro decades later he asked Castro if he would've ever recommended to Kruschev to launch those missles from cuba. He said that Castro replied "not only would I have recommended, I did request that the missles be launched.


I saw that film on Russian TV several weeks ago. Both McNamara and Castro probably aren't the best source for the details. How can you expect Soviet leadership letting some "bearded guerillas" to make such decisions? I am 100% sure that Soviet crews had orders to destroy the missiles in case of any attempt to gain control over them, not even speaking about launch codes and targeting information.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #18 on: January 04, 2006, 12:40:58 PM »
you guys really captured better germans then we did.

But our germans were pretty good!  No?
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #19 on: January 04, 2006, 01:01:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
you guys really captured better germans then we did.

But our germans were pretty good!  No?


Saturn-V was a revolutionary design, but it was impossible to do anything like that in USSR at the same time due to technological limitations.

We didn't capture any Germans from nazi missile programm, only blueprints, and it's not a secret that R-1 was an exact copy of V-2.

Sergey Korolev was a genius, he combined railway automation from 1920s, bearing skin from US 1930s airplane industry and German jet engine ideas from 1940s to make a rocket that still remains cheapest and most reliable. Russian art of engineering... If we had your money and production culture - we could wave Red Banner from Mars 20 years ago.

BTW, I have heard that US buys Soviet engines from stock prepared for N-1 launch vehicle in the 70s. I know that you buy some Russian engines, but I don't know if what I said above is true, frankly speaking I doubt it. Sounds like Japanese buying Soviet TV sets in 1970s only because of wooden cases :)

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #20 on: January 04, 2006, 01:05:26 PM »
Ill be danged....I thought for sure yyou guys captured some super germans and put em to good use.

We got that VonBraun fellow and immediately started him working on rockets.  He got us to the moon!    and stuff like that.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #21 on: January 04, 2006, 01:23:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
Ill be danged....I thought for sure yyou guys captured some super germans and put em to good use.

We got that VonBraun fellow and immediately started him working on rockets.  He got us to the moon!    and stuff like that.


Von Braun probably told you that Russians are "untermenschen" unable to do anything, didn't he?

Sputnik was a huge kick for the West, and IIRC you started your space programm only after we already hit the Moon in 1958.

Now von Braun is dead, and your manned space programm is grounded, while we still fly, isn't it strange for your logics?

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #22 on: January 04, 2006, 01:23:36 PM »
Kinda a side point.. the Russians had short range tactical nukes, and local battlefield commanders in Cuba had a green light to use 'em on an invasion fleet. It was a very, very good thing that Kennedy clamped down on the military's plan for invasion.. it would have certainly resulted in WWIII.

I suspect that those days in October were the closest this country ever came to a military coup.. followed by nuclear armegeddon. It was very very close run thing.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #23 on: January 04, 2006, 01:30:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
I suspect that those days in October were the closest this country ever came to a military coup.. followed by nuclear armegeddon. It was very very close run thing.


Hmm, I never thought about a possibility of "military coup" in the US, maybe only from "7 days in May" or how was that book called? Frankly speaking I almost forgot what it was about :(

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #24 on: January 04, 2006, 01:35:31 PM »
wile russia was busting butt to put up a little ball that only went beep-beep-beep, the USA was about to launch a real satellite that actually did something.

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #25 on: January 04, 2006, 01:39:41 PM »
Boroda,

If I recall correctly, the US and possibly even ESA is currently using a modified russian engine design for numerous applications.  Because that engine is considered "man rated", it's may also be considered for future US manned designs.  I don't think the modifications in use are all that significant though, because the engine is already relatively easy to manufacture and quite reliable.

At least that's what I remember from various random Aviation Week articles.
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #26 on: January 04, 2006, 01:44:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
wile russia was busting butt to put up a little ball that only went beep-beep-beep, the USA was about to launch a real satellite that actually did something.


Little ball that went beep-beep-beep was 10 times heavier (90kg vs. 8kg) and on a higher orbit then US "Explorer" (or was it "Discovery"? I don't remember).

By the time you launched your 8kg toy - we already had a 3500kg sattelite orbiting.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #27 on: January 04, 2006, 01:46:18 PM »
Now von Braun is dead, and your manned space programm is grounded, while we still fly, isn't it strange for your logics?
====
von Braun is dead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Nooooooo!

:cry

Can we borrow some of your germans?

:aok
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #28 on: January 04, 2006, 01:48:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by eagl
At least that's what I remember from various random Aviation Week articles.


What I heard on TV in some "defence propaganda" programm was that it's an engine from N-1, that is definetly a... let me call it "exaggeration" ;) Always fun to catch them on such things ;)

Unfortunately I don't read Aviation Week since my Father retired in 1987. I still have an issue from 1987 with "international aircraft specifications".

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Cuban Missile Crisis
« Reply #29 on: January 04, 2006, 01:55:24 PM »
all your germans are belong to us?

:noid
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns