I can't give any credit to an article wrote by a journalist living most likely in a town...
Isn't he supposed to be insane according to the article ?
ps look at what I'm reading right now :
For us, basic eugénoliens, all Centauries look alike. In particular, it is impossible to differentiate between the Centauries’ four sexes. Sometimes as on Eugenol, one would say to me:
- the Veracious ones, who always say the truth
- Liars, who always lie
- Changing, who sometimes lie, sometimes say the truth
- insane which, contrary to the three other sexes, do not reason in term of logic, and can pronounce true sentences, false or contradictory.
The eugénolien traveler is already accustomed with this classification.
We will be interested, in this series, in some ignored aspects of the centaury anatomy. Indeed, Centauries do not look alike at all. Certain anatomical characteristics differ from one individual to another. For example, each centaury has or does not have:
One of the most known characteristics of Centauries is to have a specific organ enabling them to project hydrofluoric acid at some distance and under strong pressure. At the first time of their appearance on Alpha4, Centauries had frightening means of defence, allowing the species to survive in an inhospitable environment. This organ is not identical from one individual to the other, since it can be presented under seventy two different forms. This organ can indeed be:
° lenticular or non-lenticular;
° reticulated or -non-reticulated;
° pedunculate or non-pedunculate;
° retractable, semi-retractable or non-retractable;
° spiraled, semi-spiraled, or non-spiraled.
For example, the organ of projection of Centauries can be lenticular, non-reticulated, peduncular, retractable and semi-spiraled.
This family of Centauries is made up of a Veracious, a Liar, one Changing, one Insane, a First born and a Junior. We know of this family that:
1. the Liar, Changing and First born are lenticular, but not the three others;
2. Changing, the Insane one and the First born are reticulated, but not the three others;
3. the Liar, the Veracious one and First born are pedunculate, but not the three others.
4. there are four not-spiraled
5. the two semi-retractable ones are both either pedunculate, or non-pedunculate.
6. the two retractable ones are, one pedunculate, the other non-pedunculate;
7. the spiraled one and the semi-spiraled one, who are both non –retractable, are either, or both, lenticular, or both non-lenticular;
8. one of the retractable and the spiraled one are neither, both reticulaled, nor both non-reticulated, nor both pedunculate, nor both non-pedunculate;
9. the other retractable one and the spiraled one are neither, both reticulated, neither all non-reticulated;
10 the spiraled one and one of the retractable are both -non-reticulated;
11 one of the semi-retractable is reticulated;
12 the other semi-retractable one and the retractable one who is pedunculate , are both reticulated, or both non-reticulated.
Who is the spiraled one?
isn't pure logic beautifull ?
