I dont understand why so many prosecutors so vehemently fight against providing state paid for DNA tests that might prove the innocence of a convict.
In the Coleman case the guy was already dead, so the benefit would have been more political, but it would have opened a few eyes had he been found innocent.
As usual I see the OJ case brought up, but let me tell you that is an annomoly, in the vast majority of cases the defendant has a fraction of the resources available
to the prosecution.
The only reason that I oppose the death penalty is not because I dont believe that there are people out there that deserve it, its because I have seen the system break down and convict the innocent.
shamus