Author Topic: LA perking  (Read 1470 times)

Offline outbreak

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
LA perking
« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2006, 06:38:16 PM »
YOU DID NOT JUST DOUBLE POST THAT D*** LA PERK POST, THAT IS OLD AND GETTING OLDER. LA WILL NEVER BE PERKED ITS A SIMPLE FACT UNLESS THE LA CAN CARRY A SIDEWINDER OR A NUKE IT WILL NOT BE PERKED, IT IS TO WEAK TO BE PERKED, YOU CAN TAKE AN LA7 EASY IN A 109. THATS WHY ITS NOT PERKED  :mad: :aok

Offline GunnerCAF

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
      • Gunner's Grange
LA perking
« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2006, 06:41:27 PM »
If you want FAIR, then perks are backwards in the MA.  The people with the most skill should only get the poor performing planes, so things are more even.  Perks can be givin to the new guys, then taken away as they get good :D

Gunner
Gunner
Cactus Air Force

Offline Hoarach

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2406
LA perking
« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2006, 06:42:02 PM »
:furious
:mad:
Whats with the caps lock?

:furious
Fringe
Nose Art
80th FS "Headhunters"

Secret Association of P38 Pilots

Offline Wolf14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 858
LA perking
« Reply #18 on: January 19, 2006, 06:45:00 PM »
He's trying to yell.

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
LA perking
« Reply #19 on: January 19, 2006, 06:46:02 PM »
Spit16 this month:

21,065 kills,  18,175 deaths

La7 this month:

17,391 kills,   14,714 deaths
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline outbreak

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
LA perking
« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2006, 07:30:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hoarach
:furious
:mad:
Whats with the caps lock?

:furious


Because that darn post is Already in the Wishlists and he Decides to bring it to the GD, I mean if he wants an Awnser he doesnt need to double Post the darn thing.

JMO.

Offline bagrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1936
double post
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2006, 09:22:14 PM »
I appreciate your responses, althoght to those who say it is not good enough to perk I'de still have to disagree.
 
I double posted this just because i had a feeling this area was a more open place to discuss the situation, and people can read what has already been said  until now, if they wanted.

i dont understand your anger OUTBREAK, if seein someone move somethin from one area to another angers you well......Its your life.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2006, 09:25:15 PM by bagrat »
Last post by bagrat - The last thing you'll see before your thread dies since 2005.

Offline outbreak

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
LA perking
« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2006, 09:30:02 PM »
You did not Move it the other post is still there,  And the LA7 in NO way should be perked, There is no Staggering proof showing the LA7 having any LARGE Performance upgrades, Maybe if the LA had 2 Sets of 450 Cannon rounds,  Hell yea then perk it but 450 Rounds is not nuff Cannon to perk a plane. End of Story :aok

Offline bagrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1936
LA performance
« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2006, 10:26:07 PM »
Outbreak in response to your statement. LA-7 has more cannon than spit14, 20 less than the TA, an F4U4 has .50's.

LA-7 still outruns all of them! NOT ONLY THAT it reached its maximum speed at fraction of the time that they did. (KEEP IN MIND THESE PLANES ARE ALL PERKED)

Also it's 3 cannons are all nose mounted meaning(aside from the arc of the bullet) there is not much means to its convergence, and hits will land relatively closer together.
Last post by bagrat - The last thing you'll see before your thread dies since 2005.

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
LA perking
« Reply #24 on: January 19, 2006, 10:54:47 PM »
and don't forget the 3-cannon La-7s saw action in late MARCH 1945!

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
LA perking
« Reply #25 on: January 19, 2006, 10:56:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by outbreak
You did not Move it the other post is still there,  And the LA7 in NO way should be perked, There is no Staggering proof showing the LA7 having any LARGE Performance upgrades, Maybe if the LA had 2 Sets of 450 Cannon rounds,  Hell yea then perk it but 450 Rounds is not nuff Cannon to perk a plane. End of Story :aok


Anytime you wanna see just what the La7 is capable of.  I'll DA You.  I guarantee you this, you'll want perked afterwards.



Karaya
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline tikky

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
LA perking
« Reply #26 on: January 20, 2006, 12:31:41 AM »
Before perking spit 16s and LA7s, you must first perk all late war (1944-1945) rides.  All late war planes are just as equal as La-7s.

Planes that should be perked if La-7 and Spit 16s are perked

*amerikan*
F4U-1D
F4U-1C
F4U-4
P-38L
P-47D-25
P-47D-40
P-47N
P-51B
P-51D

*German*
Bf-109G-14
Bf-109K-4
Fw-190A-8
Fw-190F-8
Fw-190D-9

*British*
Spitfire XIV
Spitfire XVI
Typhoon
Tempest

*Japanese*
N1K2-J
Ki-84

*USSR*
La-7
Yak-9U


Either perk all late war planes or leave the La-7s and Spit 16s alone

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4053
LA perking
« Reply #27 on: January 20, 2006, 12:42:26 AM »
Oh good grief...Not the Yak!!:cry :huh
Former XO: Birds of Prey (BOPs - AH2)
Former CO: 91st Bomb Group (H)
Current Assignment: Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
LA perking
« Reply #28 on: January 20, 2006, 03:30:36 AM »
Don't perk the Lala it's my perk farm :D

Offline StarOfAfrica2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5162
      • http://www.vf-17.org
Re: double post
« Reply #29 on: January 20, 2006, 04:25:59 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by bagrat
I appreciate your responses, althoght to those who say it is not good enough to perk I'de still have to disagree.
 
I double posted this just because i had a feeling this area was a more open place to discuss the situation, and people can read what has already been said  until now, if they wanted.

i dont understand your anger OUTBREAK, if seein someone move somethin from one area to another angers you well......Its your life.


How about this reason

Quote
3- Do not open a new thread that duplicates a current topic.


If this is the forum you wanted the post in, you should request the first one be closed and/or moved, not start a second one.  Just letting you know how its supposed to be done, thats all.