« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Do-17  (Read 2393 times)

Offline Klum25th

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 327
      • http://www.75thrazgriz.bravehost.com
Do-17
« Reply #15 on: January 30, 2006, 12:54:02 PM »
sweet can wait:aok
Logged

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Do-17
« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2006, 03:21:50 PM »
bastard :lol
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Do-17
« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2006, 03:36:34 PM »
Unless I'm wrong... The 217 had 4 engines. Each prop had 2 engines powering it. How would this affect an engine if only 1 of the 2 connected to the prop got damaged/died?? Wouldn't it effectively kill the engine, thus taking out 1/2 the propulsion with only 1/4 the damage?

I think that might nerf this plane, damage-wise.
Logged

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Do-17
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2006, 03:41:52 PM »
Hmm it's not the Do-217 Krusty, I know what aircraft you mean though, it's Heinkel He.....?

I have a modell of that too, I'll post some pics aswell.

They placed 4 engines in 2 pods because (I believe it was Goring?) didn't want a 4 engined bomber.
They solved the "problem" by placing 2 engines in each pod, but it had lots of problems (it kept burst out in flames)
Logged

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Do-17
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2006, 03:57:35 PM »
thats the Heinkel 177 you are thinking of, the 277 was the 4 engined (conventional) version.

177



277

Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Do-17
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2006, 04:25:48 PM »
ahh, that's right, He177 my bad! :)
Logged

Offline Klum25th

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 327
      • http://www.75thrazgriz.bravehost.com
Do-17
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2006, 07:27:03 PM »
lol. Yea that be a cool plane to add. I would also like to the see the Focke-Wulf 200 condor. That would also be an awsome ship destroyer.
Logged

Offline SMIDSY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1248
Do-17
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2006, 07:34:15 PM »
yah, the condor would be sweet if we could code in anti-shipping missiles.



PS
BlueJ, for the link in yours and my sig, enter this in the sig box for a propper link:

[ url=http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Bunny%20Dictator] CLICK HERE FOR WOLD DOMINATION WEBSITE![/url]



PPS
eliminate space between "[" and "url" at the beginning to make it work.
Logged

Offline BlueJ1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5826
Do-17
« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2006, 07:36:32 PM »
What if I dont want to. :D

I noticed it a few days ago but I was to lazy to fix it.
Logged
U.S.N.
Aviation Electrician MH-60S
OEF 08-09'

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Do-17
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2006, 01:00:23 AM »
Condor was easy pickings. It had a light bomb load (doesn't take much to sink a ship) and was very vulnerable. Once they began encountering resistance they were pulled from duty because of losses, if I recall
Logged

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Do-17
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2006, 12:26:09 PM »
OTH - If theCondor could vector in U-Boats to carrier group ... :cool:
Logged
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Do-17
« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2006, 12:43:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martyn
OTH - If theCondor could vector in U-Boats to carrier group ... :cool:

Precisely how long to you think any carrier group would have a Condor orbiting it?

Carriers have these things called "fighters" that merchant convoys normally lack...

I'd enjoy seeing to Condor as it is one of the naturual prey items for Mossies.  I just don't think I'd see very many people willing to play the part of prey.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Do-17
« Reply #27 on: January 31, 2006, 05:06:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
I just don't think I'd see very many people willing to play the part of prey.


Precisely!
Logged

Offline Klum25th

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 327
      • http://www.75thrazgriz.bravehost.com
Do-17
« Reply #28 on: January 31, 2006, 05:52:41 PM »
I always like to be prey, it really helps to learn new moves to aviod enemies, or get up on there @**!
Logged

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Do-17
« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2006, 03:47:15 AM »
I've often reported CVs and been far enough away not to be bothered. Especially at long ranges. I've even torpedoed CVs and survived (just) using JU88s - provided the CV is far from the action.

Anyway, I just like the idea of using different aircraft for usefully in the MA.
Logged
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »