Author Topic: What I love about RPS? (Read 772 times)

Kev367th · « **Reply #15 on:** January 31, 2006, 01:43:14 PM »

Getting away from the perked/non-perked

Problem is, and will remain for some time the slanted planesets-
44/45 Covered really well
42/43 Less so
40/41 Barely

But this is a result of the MA, everyone wants the late war stuff.
Think I worked out that 65%+ of the LW/US planes are from the final 2 years of the war.

Would be nice after they get finished going around all the current stuff updating them, they revisit the early/mid war years and fill them out.

I would bet their are at least 2 or 3 190/109/Spits that could still be added from 40-43.

Grits · « **Reply #16 on:** January 31, 2006, 10:13:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Shifty
Is it possible the Seafire could possibly sub for any missing early spits up to the MkIX?

The Seafire IIc is nearly identical (for AH purposes) to the Spit Vc. Its a bit heavier from being navalized, but it should be used any time that the Vc would have been used.

Kev367th · « **Reply #17 on:** February 01, 2006, 02:54:37 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Grits
The Seafire IIc is nearly identical (for AH purposes) to the Spit Vc. Its a bit heavier from being navalized, but it should be used any time that the Vc would have been used.

Yup, it could have been used as a sub for a late 1941 F Vc.

Maybe next time round?

Big G · « **Reply #18 on:** February 01, 2006, 10:16:13 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by storch
we need more dedicated allied squads in the arena so you guys would be welcome table fare...er .... um .... adversaries. ya that's it adversaries.

The 78thFG is now Operational, About to sweep the channel and Northern France of all those pesky LW, you have have had enough warning to get your transfer papers in for Eastern Front...........

Sable · « **Reply #19 on:** February 01, 2006, 10:23:52 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Kev367th
Yup, it could have been used as a sub for a late 1941 F Vc.

Maybe next time round?

Is there any performance difference between the Seafire and the Vb (in AH)? When I played with them for a few minutes offline they seemed to have nearly identical speeds and climb rates with the Vb being a little better.

Grits · « **Reply #20 on:** February 01, 2006, 11:40:51 AM »

Seafire has double the cannon ammo, 240 vs the Vb's 120, otherwise they should be nearly identical. Put the Vb in for the first couple days, then last couple days of the V series put in the Seafire/Vc.

storch · « **Reply #21 on:** February 01, 2006, 12:11:31 PM »

the Vb seems to turn slightly better. the seafire may be a good addition on the last day or two of spitVs. I would add it as opposed to replacing the Vb with it.