Originally posted by Masherbrum
Also, "about once every 2000 rounds" can be construed a hundred different ways.
It can?
That seems like a rather false position taken simply to back up your bias against cannons.
If, as you insinuate, cannons were junk with a high jam rate often leading fighter pilots to shot down their targets with the MG secondary armament don't you think that Germany, Japan, Italy, Russia, France, the United Kingdom and the United States Navy would have kept going with MGs? Just maybe?
As to how that statement can be interpeted 100 different ways I can't see. It is as clear in its meaning as an english phrase can be.