Author Topic: Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:  (Read 499 times)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« on: September 11, 2000, 08:24:00 AM »
Press Ignores Gore Scandal

Source: Washington Times
Published: 9/6/00 Author: Tony Blankley

Al Gore is about to have woman troubles: No, not that kind. Her name is Victoria Cummock. She alleges that Mr. Gore was in bed, not with a woman, but with the airline industry he was entrusted to investigate when TWA Flight 800 went down. In June last year she won a little-noted decision in the D.C. Court of Appeals that keeps her search for truth alive. The search continues, and Mr. Gore is about to learn that Mrs. Cummock is not a woman with whom to be trifled.

What brings her case to mind is the maxim of Washington journalism that if a politician champions a particular value, he deserves to be measured by that standard himself. So, when I see Mr. Gore repeatedly assume the heroic pose on behalf of the little guy against the powerful special interests, my thoughts turn to Victoria Cummock. Here's why.

In 1996, in the aftermath of the crash of TWA Flight 800, President Clinton personally called Mrs. Cummock to ask her to serve as a commissioner on The White House Commission on Aviation Safety, created to investigate the crash. He also appointed Mr. Gore to be its chairman. She was chosen because her husband had been killed in the Pan Am 103/Lockerbie crash. Since then, she had become a leading passenger-rights advocate, and Mr. Clinton had assured her he sincerely wanted to develop new, tough counter-terrorism procedures. He instructed Mr. Gore to make recommendations within 45 days.

The Gore Commission produced a tough preliminary report, and at a Sept. 9, 1996, press conference Mr. Gore publicly asserted the need for those changes. And then, all hell broke loose — but for Mr. Gore, not for the terrorists. "Within ten days, the whole [airline] industry jumped all over Al Gore," Mrs. Cummock reported. On Sept. 19, Mr. Gore sent a letter to airline lobbyist Carol Hallett, promising that the commission's findings would not cause the airlines any loss of revenue. The next day the Democratic National Committee received a $40,000 contribution from TWA. In the next two weeks Northwest, United and American Airlines donated $55,000 more.

In the following two months (leading up to the November 1996 presidential elections) American Airlines donated a quarter of a million dollars to the Democrats. United Airlines donated $100,000 to the DNC. Northwestern upped its anty to $53,000. In all, Mr. Gore and the Democrats collected almost half a million dollars between the election and the day — two months before — that Mr. Gore assured the airlines his commission wouldn't cost them any money.

At the time, White House spokesperson Ginny Terzano refused either to confirm or deny that Mr. Gore personally solicited the airline contributions. But that is not what got Victoria Cummock's dander up.

In January 1997, Mr. Gore's staff circulated a draft final report that eliminated all security measures from their findings. Not only Mrs. Cummock, but CIA Director and fellow Commissioner John Deutch complained. So Mr. Gore pulled back the draft. In February Mr. Gore finally came up with the classic Washington ploy. The final report called for sensible new procedures that would cost the airlines millions of dollars: 450 high tech bomb detectors, more training for airport security, criminal background checks for security personnel, increased canine patrols. But Victoria Cummock noticed one thing was missing — there was no timetable to accomplish these requirements. She informed the vice president that without timetables, the report was "toothless" and she couldn't support it, but instead would file a dissent.

It was a classic Washington victory. The policy wonks got their proposals noticed, the airlines got their bottom line protected and Mr. Gore got his party the money. The only losers were the passengers, who got no increased security from terrorism. So, when Mr. Gore actually had a chance to fight, rather than talk about, the powerful special interests on behalf of the little guy, he turned his money-stuffed coat and protected the interests that bought him.

In an open meeting on Feb. 12, Mr. Gore stated that he would leave room in the final report for Victoria Cummock's dissent. A few minutes later at the White House, as Mr. Gore presented the final report to President Clinton, the vice president announced that the report was unanimous. Both of those Gore lies are on video tape. NBC's Dateline has the tapes.

And so Mrs. Cummock went to court. Not on behalf of some conspiracy theory, but on the right to see commission files that were denied her and the right to file a dissent. She only wanted the commission's own findings to be enforced. After winning in the D.C. Court of Appeals last year, she is slowly gaining discovery of the commission's secret files.

She has already found one interesting document in the secret commission files: A letter to Mr. Gore from his now famous convicted felon fund-raiser Maria Hsia. In that note she talks about the successful fund-raiser at the Buddhist Temple and asks the vice president for help in getting government funding for her to be part of the Project Citizenship initiative. Now, however did that note end up in the secret Gore Commission files? More to come.


Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2000, 12:28:00 AM »
The US media is run by the Secret Liberal Conspiracy Commision.

They always focus on the poor republicans, and never on the dastardly Democrats.

 

------------------
StSanta
JG54 "Grünherz"
"If you died a stones throw from your wingie; you did no wrong". - Hangtime

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2000, 12:40:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by StSanta:
The US media is run by the Secret Liberal Conspiracy Commision.

They always focus on the poor republicans, and never on the dastardly Democrats.

 


 That about sums it up, 80% of the media anyway.

 

Udie


Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2000, 05:11:00 AM »
The last 20% were quite vocal during the Lewinsky deal  

------------------
StSanta
JG54 "Grünherz"
"If you died a stones throw from your wingie; you did no wrong". - Hangtime

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2000, 11:07:00 AM »
Typical ... Do your part and vote 'em out this November

Eagler
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2000, 12:35:00 PM »
You better know that's right Eagler!  I'm camping out the night before!!!

udie

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2000, 12:41:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by StSanta:
The last 20% were quite vocal during the Lewinsky deal  



 hehe StSanta, the liberal 80% were vocal during the lewinski debacle. The other 20% were busy trying to tell the people about the REAL crimes he was commiting.  In my opinion that whole thing was just a HUGE smoke screne, there's no telling what he got away with.  

 There was a show on TLC sunday night about the last 4 presidents.  One of the first things they said about clinton is that he has used the military more times and on more diferent countries than any other president in US history. Not bad for somebody who said they "loathed the military".  If you check the dates of all of clinton's wars 90% of them have started on the day something bad started in the media about him and ended HOURS after the bad news stopped.  

 boy I bet America is gonna pay bigtime for him  

Udie

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2000, 12:45:00 PM »
Damn conserative meadia.

Do your research.  The idea that the media is liberal is a bunch of hogwash fed to us by consevatives.

 

Sisu
-Karnak
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2000, 01:06:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak:
Damn conserative meadia.

Do your research.  The idea that the media is liberal is a bunch of hogwash fed to us by consevatives.

   

Sisu
-Karnak

hehehe inlighten us please    I watch as much as I can stumach of the 3 major networks and CNN.  They have ALL closed ranks around gore and hillery. CNBC does a pretty good job of only being slanted to the left and FOX doest a pretty good job of only being slanted to the right.  All the others are full blown leftists. gore or lieberman are on the today show or good morning america at least once or twice a week since the democrat convention. All the host just buble with joy and don't ask any real questions. gore goes on Oprah yesterday.  hillery was on good morning america today. Bush was too, but they didn't ask him about what he wanted to do as president. They attacked him on adds.
 
 The only time you ever hear Bush or Cheney's name, or any conservative for that matter, mentioned on any of those shows or networks it's in a negative way.   The conservatives have Fox news, which is realy just ballance. Though probobly slightly slanted to the right w/ Tony Snow, but they still have the left's point of view represented too.  Then there's A.M. radio, thank God for it and Rush Limbaugh.  At least there's somewhere we can turn for truth instead of liberal propoganda.

 hehe I don't know where you see any conservatives in the mainstream press though.  I know of a few, Brit Hume (sp?), Tony Snow, and George Will.  All the others are liberals.  There was a survey done just 2 weeks ago that concluded that 89% of the media is liberal.  That would be ok if they could show impartiality, but sadly only about 2% seem to be able to do that.

 No way can you ever convince me that the media doesn't have an agenda.  They HATE conservatives.  They will do anything they can get away with, and then more sometimes, to hurt conservatives or republicans.  Some proof of how much they hate conservatives was their reaction in '94 when the republicans took the house and senate for the first time since the 50's.  They looked shattered, and couldn't believe what was happening. Then when the president was giving a deposition for the Paula Jones deal, the first time a sitting president ever did that, the media was reporting on how the republicans wanted to kill old people and starve children. LOL! The sad part is that it actualy worked.  

 The media is defenately with out a doubt liberal.  But they've been that way for a long time, and republicans have gotten used to it.  Though it still tends to get me mad from time to time.

 Oops sorry for the novel, but you kind of set me off    Hey! at least we agree about Aces High!  

Udie

[This message has been edited by Udie (edited 09-12-2000).]

Offline 1776

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
      • http://Iain'tgotno.com
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2000, 02:38:00 PM »
What ever happen to the democratic party Of
"ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country."?

AlGore wants to enact more of LBJ then LBJ ever thought could be enacted!!!

If the Dems win the White House and Congress, look out America!!!

Be prepared to pay 70%-80% of your income to the government for redistribution purposes!!

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2000, 12:35:00 AM »
Heh, no slam intended but....

you republicans are paranoid. It really matters little who wins office, as both parties pretty much have approached each other. There are leftish republicans and rightish democrats.

And the media ain't run by any of 'um. It's run by private citizens who do their stuff.

I've heard literally thousands of time "if [insert party] wins, the world is going to hell in a handbasket.

In comes a new party, some minor changes, nothing much changes. One advocates redistribution of wealth in a very limited fashion (compared to European counterparts), the other doesn't, and advocates more of an isolationist approach in international affairs. Both have religious nutcases using the big skydaddy in the sky as an emotional argument. One things guns probably have something to say in some deaths, the other says no. One says "let the women choose", the other screams "murderers!".

Heh, what a comedy  

------------------
StSanta
JG54 "Grünherz"
"If you died a stones throw from your wingie; you did no wrong". - Hangtime

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Press chooses to ignore this Gore story:
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2000, 12:49:00 PM »
Thats the way it seems StSanta. First thing you've said that I agree with.  

You got to admit, my American friends, that it seems there is little change from one administration to the next - maybe that's a good thing, I dunno.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.