Author Topic: we need a HALIFAX bomber!  (Read 2830 times)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2006, 07:03:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
The Wellington and the Halifax both preceeded the Lancaster. These three planes (Lancaster, Wellington a.k.a. "Wimpey", and Halifax) made up the mainstay of Bomber Command throughout the entire war. Especially the early war. As it is we really only have the Lancaster for brit level bombers, and it's mid-war at best. We need the Wellington and the Halifax to better represent the early planeset. While they could still carry good loads (I think the Halifax also carried 14x 1k bombs) they were lightly defended and slower, and had much less powerful engines.

I say we need both! Halifax AND Wellington!!!

The Wellington was supposed to be VERY sturdy, due to its latice-work wooden frame. Suppose that means it could take a lot of damage, but once it caught fire I guess it'd be like B24s (evil grin here).


The Stirling was the first of the RAF Heavies, the Wellington and Halifax were actually much more popular with the crews than the Lancaster was.  The Halifax entered limited service in around mid 1941 iirc, whereas the Stirling was in service a bit earlier.  The Lanc followed about a year later in mid 1942.  

The Wellington could take a tremendous beating without sustaining critical damage, the structure was designed by Barnes Wallis (of dambusters/grand slam fame) and was origininally used in pre war air ships.

You can see the structure around the windows of this picture - looks almost like honeycomb.


The Stirling was good on paper, but was pretty unpopular, it was to a specification which called for a 4 engined bomber to fit into existing RAF hangars.  This meant that it had a small wingspan, and crappy service ceiling. (something like 16,000 feet)

IIRC the Wellington could carry around 4,000lb bombs, the Halifax could carry 14,000lb with the Mk I or 13,000lb Mk III.  The Stirling could carry up to 17,000lb!!

There is a good website on the Stirling: http://www.stirling.box.nl/home.htm
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2006, 07:10:01 AM »
Hate to say it - but until we start having NIGHT TIME, British bombers such as the Lanc, Wellington, Halifax, etc. (except for the Mosquito) just can't make it. They really don't have the armament to defend themselves.
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2006, 07:20:20 AM »
the Mosquito B.35 would be pretty untouchable if it was in game and used correctly.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline AApache

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2006, 07:43:20 AM »
Awesome Canadian bomber . It would make a great addition to the game
"WE WEREN'T ASSIGNED WE WERE REQUESTED"....Lt.Col.Benjamin O. Davis of the Tuskegee Airmen 

https://youtu.be/B2sDNT91Rzw

https://youtu.be/KaufhZv84Gk

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #19 on: February 12, 2006, 07:46:05 AM »
Canadian?  Handley Page were based in Radlett, Hertfordshire, England!
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Hornet33

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #20 on: February 12, 2006, 08:46:46 AM »
How about the Fiesler Storch? That one been requested before? Let it be able to carry 2 troops so you and four of your squadies can land it in the town next to the map room and let your 2 troopers out:D
AHII Con 2006, HiTech, "This game is all about pissing off the other guy!!"

Offline Pooh21

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3145
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #21 on: February 12, 2006, 02:27:38 PM »
We need a TB-3!!!
Bis endlich der Fiend am Boden liegt.
Bis Bishland bis Bishland bis Bishland wird besiegt!

Offline simshell

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #22 on: February 12, 2006, 04:03:15 PM »
hanger qeen but i love hanger qeens  its fun flying around and feeling unique
known as Arctic in the main

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #23 on: February 12, 2006, 05:39:26 PM »
Hrm... now that you post a pic of it, I was thinking of the "Sterling" when I was talking about a bomber that was made with a wooden framework, I guess!

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #24 on: February 13, 2006, 01:56:25 AM »
Heres a Stirling, pretty big aeroplane!

I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2006, 07:48:03 AM »
Has a huge bomb-bay as well ;)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2006, 12:38:36 PM »
Oh, okay, then I was right! The Wellington is the one with the latice-work wooden frame, yes?

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #27 on: February 13, 2006, 12:51:21 PM »
kind of, except it wasnt made of wood.

a quick google found me this: -

http://www.divetheworld.com/Diving/warbirds/Wellington/index.htm



I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #28 on: February 13, 2006, 01:22:38 PM »
Halifax and Lancaster are, in game terms, practically the same bomber.  The Lanc carries 14,000lbs as opposed to the Halifax's 13,500lbs.  Speed would be very similar.  The biggest difference would be the durability.  Lancasters had a notably lower loss rate than Halifaxes, although a doomed Halifax was easier to get out of than a doomed Lancaster.  It terms of crew survival it is about even, in terms of continued use the Lancaster was the better bomber.

The Wellington would make for an excellent early war Allied bomber that has a useful warload while still being vulnerable to early Axis fighters.  Of all Allied bombers the Wellinton and an early B-25 top the needed list.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
we need a HALIFAX bomber!
« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2006, 06:04:59 PM »
Wellington a.k.a. "Wimpey" after the Popeye character ("J. Wellington Wimpey"), B-25C, and He111H-family (-6 or maybe -16?? something), and the G4M1 "Betty" are the most vital missing pieces to the early/mid war bomber set. In my opinion.