Author Topic: Wtg Sd!!! (Read 3083 times)

Eagler · « **on:** February 22, 2006, 10:19:29 PM »

South Dakota passes abortion ban

it's a start ...

SOB · « **Reply #1 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:25:53 PM »

That's unfortunate.

Hangtime · « **Reply #2 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:28:12 PM »

Hicks.

SOB · « **Reply #3 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:29:04 PM »

Quote

Proposed amendments to the law to create exceptions to specifically protect the health of the mother, or in cases of rape or incest, were voted down. Also defeated was an amendment to put the proposal in the hands of voters

Politicians.

Hangtime · « **Reply #4 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:33:23 PM »

political brown shirt republicrat hicks.

RAIDER14 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:35:01 PM »

ok safe to say there is gonna be no more hookers in south dakota

Toad · « **Reply #6 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:35:55 PM »

I read somewhere that it was written the way it was for one purpose only:

To get the issue to the Supreme Court.

The writers know it will be immediately challenged, they deliberately omitted the "health of the woman" clause.

This is it. They are going for Gary Cooper in "High Noon". Or maybe Jimmy Stewart in "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance".

It's the big SHOWDOWN.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:39:25 PM »

Yup, Toad is correct. It's going to be appealed all the way to the supreme court.

SOB · « **Reply #8 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:41:47 PM »

Quote

Proposed amendments to the law to create exceptions to specifically protect the health of the mother, or in cases of rape or incest, were voted down. Also defeated was an amendment to put the proposal in the hands of voters.

The bill as written does make an exception if the fetus dies during a doctor's attempt to save the mother's life.

I read that to mean that abortions aren't allowed period, even in the case that the pregnancy might affect the health of the mother - the last sentence referring to a fetus dying as a result of complications from some other procedure to save the mother's life.

Pathetic as a political ploy. Pathetic as a law. Toad is right though, obviously it's a setup for a showdown.

Mini D · « **Reply #9 on:** February 22, 2006, 10:51:57 PM »

I think quite a few politicians are going to be suprised at the ruling if this actually goes up before the U.S. supreme court.

Saintaw · « **Reply #10 on:** February 22, 2006, 11:45:47 PM »

Welcome back to the 19th century South Dakota! wtg indeed!

Sandman · « **Reply #11 on:** February 23, 2006, 12:32:02 AM »

Woot! More government!

Eagler · « **Reply #12 on:** February 23, 2006, 05:38:37 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lasersailor184
Yup, Toad is correct. It's going to be appealed all the way to the supreme court.

like I said, it's a start ... could backfire though ..

storch · « **Reply #13 on:** February 23, 2006, 06:31:45 AM »

we need to kick off one more justice to be sure, then our domination of the liberals will be complete at the top. now to start working on the congress to abolish many of the lower courts especially the 9th circuit.

Mighty1 · « **Reply #14 on:** February 23, 2006, 06:57:55 AM »

WTG SD!

I'm glad they didn't waste any time starting down the path to get rid of that POS Roe v Wade.

One of if not the worst ruling by the USSC.

Author Topic: Wtg Sd!!! (Read 3083 times)

storch