Actually... lazs, I think your idea is brilliant. (mmphht)
So brilliant in fact, that I will stick my neck out and ask the question for you.
Lets, for the sake of argument, say that the overwhelming consensus of health professionals is that a fetus could be considered viable, with a 60% chance of survival outside of the womb at 6 months.
Lets say that those odds drop to 30% at 5 months.
Lets say that those odds drop to 0% at 4 months. Not viable.
Would the pro-lifers here accept abortion at 3 months and prior?
(oops, watch as your little epiphany and "nailed down" entrance into this debate becomes a little less nailed down.)
A question to pro-lifers: Considering the above, would you accept abortion at 3 months and prior, but no later than 3 months? And... what does the term "viability" mean to you with respect to this debate, if anything?
Do you agree with lazs, along with a whole lotta Liberals, that if "the thing is viable outside the womb then it is too friggin late?" And that if it is not, then it isn't too late?