Author Topic: Miami (2) (Read 579 times)

beet1e · « **Reply #15 on:** February 27, 2006, 09:14:36 AM »

Nope - until a couple of hours ago, I did not know the reason for the cancellation. It could have been the weather for all I knew. All I know now is that it was a technical defect with the aircraft. That's all I said.

Nilsen · « **Reply #16 on:** February 27, 2006, 10:34:44 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
The initial comment shows a lack of knowledge about daily aircraft in service.

Or are you just exhibiting a lack of good sense or judgment in that you think there is some particular brand of commercial airliner that never, ever have mechanical malfunctions that result in flight cancellation?

Tupolev's seems to have a near perfect track record

Toad · « **Reply #17 on:** February 27, 2006, 11:17:27 AM »

Yah, right. Perfect, fer shure, dude.

Nilsen · « **Reply #18 on:** February 27, 2006, 11:24:05 AM »

Yup or it was the Yakolev.. heck they are all great! The best is the one with all the propellers and such

Curval · « **Reply #19 on:** February 27, 2006, 11:42:10 AM »

Well...the Concordski was the Tupolev TU144. It crashed at the Paris Airshow 1973 killing all aboard.

Nilsen · « **Reply #20 on:** February 27, 2006, 11:55:55 AM »

capitalist propaganda Curval

tomato · « **Reply #21 on:** February 27, 2006, 12:45:23 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Yah, right. Perfect, fer shure, dude.

beet1e · « **Reply #22 on:** February 27, 2006, 12:52:48 PM »