Author Topic: Coulter Oscar predictions (Read 4777 times)

Ripsnort · « **on:** March 05, 2006, 04:52:58 PM »

She's pretty funny! A trace of truth runs through her article, read on:

Quote

The box office numbers for this year's favorite, "Brokeback Mountain," are more jealously guarded than the nuclear codes in the president's black box. Hollywood liberals want the government to release everything we know about al-Zarqawi, but refuse to release the number of people who have seen "Brokeback Mountain."

I shall summarize the plots of the five movies nominated for best picture below:

"Brokeback Mountain" (gay)

"Capote" (death penalty with bonus gay lead)

"Crash" (racism)

"Good Night, and Good Luck" (McCarthyism)

"Munich" (Jew athletes at Munich had it coming)

Everyone says it's going to be "Crash," but I think "Crash" is too popular with filmgoers. Moreover, Hollywood feels it has done enough for the blacks. Hollywood can never do enough for the gays. Gays in the military, gays in the Texas Rangers, gays on the range. It's like a brokeback record! As Pat Buchanan said, homosexuality has gone from "the love that dare not speak its name" to "the love that won't shut up."

Is the idea of gay cowboys really that new? Didn't the Village People do that a couple of decades ago? Am I the only person who saw John Travolta in "Urban Cowboy"?

Movies with the same groundbreaking theme to come:

"Westward Homo!"

"The Magnificent, Fabulous Seven"

"Gunfight at the K-Y Corral"

"How West Hollywood Was Won"

Snip-----------------
After consulting with the Yale admissions committee, the awards committee will give the Oscar to ... "Paradise Now," a heartwarming story about Palestinian suicide bombers. How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs. It's Air Syria's featured in-flight movie this month -- go figure! I don't want to spoil the ending for you, but let's just say there won't be a sequel.

continued...

SOB · « **Reply #1 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:08:15 PM »

She sure is a sad angry avacado.

Thrawn · « **Reply #2 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:17:13 PM »

Indeed, why should she give a damn if movies are made about gay guys. No one is making her watch them if she doesn't want to.

Maverick · « **Reply #3 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:18:25 PM »

Rip,

Funny satire on hollywierd alright.

BluKitty · « **Reply #4 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:18:57 PM »

Everything to her is defined by 'race', 'gender' or religion..... nevermind the plot.

what a great thinker (rollseyes).

-------

She's only makeing herself look stupid--\/

Urchin · « **Reply #5 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:19:23 PM »

My inner conservative laughed.

Hell, you all need to buy bigger panties if they are getting all bunched up in your bellybutton over that... it was actually funny.

midnight Target · « **Reply #6 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:19:44 PM »

hehe.

While the republicans control the house, senate, presidency and the supreme court they still need a scape goat to blame their problems upon.

It's all hollywood's fault of course.

BluKitty · « **Reply #7 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:21:04 PM »

It's kind of funny watching them trying to define outgroups.

It's kind of scarey when they are succesful.

Thrawn · « **Reply #8 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:22:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Urchin
My inner conservative laughed.

Hell, you all need to buy bigger panties if they are getting all bunched up in your bellybutton over that... it was actually funny.

No panties bunched, I'm not pissed off she's so angry and invents things to be pissed of about...I just think it's kind of sad.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #9 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:25:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Urchin
My inner conservative laughed.

Hell, you all need to buy bigger panties if they are getting all bunched up in your bellybutton over that... it was actually funny.

Exactly!

bj229r · « **Reply #10 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:41:19 PM »

Her only goal in life is to point out the stupidity and inconsistencies of liberalism...and make gobs of money at it. I can never wait for Wednesdays when her columns come out--they're a hoot.

Quote

Call me old-fashioned, but a grief-stricken war mother shouldn't have her own full-time PR flack. After your third profile on "Entertainment Tonight," you're no longer a grieving mom; you're a C-list celebrity trolling for a book deal or a reality show.

Quote

One showed Muhammad turning away suicide bombers from the gates of heaven, saying "Stop, stop — we ran out of virgins!" — which I believe was a commentary on Muslims' predilection for violence. Another was a cartoon of Muhammad with horns, which I believe was a commentary on Muslims' predilection for violence. The third showed Muhammad with a turban in the shape of a bomb, which I believe was an expression of post-industrial ennui in a secular — oops, no, wait: It was more of a commentary on Muslims' predilection for violence.

In order to express their displeasure with the idea that Muslims are violent, thousands of Muslims around the world engaged in rioting, arson, mob savagery, flag-burning, murder and mayhem, among other peaceful acts of nonviolence.

Muslims are the only people who make feminists seem laid-back.

Quote

Madam Hillary also said the Bush administration "will go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country." While Hillary is certainly qualified to comment on what the all-time worst presidential administrations were, having had firsthand experience in one of them, I think she might want to avoid the phrase "go down in history."

xrtoronto · « **Reply #11 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:47:58 PM »

(I bet if she pulled up her skirt, she'd have a pair)

Squire · « **Reply #12 on:** March 05, 2006, 05:51:17 PM »

I dont get what some folks say about "Munich", I saw it, and there was nothing at all "sympathetic" about the terrorists, or their point of view. I think that comes from folks who have not seen the film. Its based on the book "Vengeance" which also is not sympathetic to the Munich 1972 terrorists. If somebody can point out the supposed scene or text that was pro-terrorist, please enlighten me. It shows in fact, quite graphically, the very brutal way in which the Israeli athletes were murdered. There was nothing "pro Black September" about it .

As for the Mossad hit squad, it does show them as human beings, doing a crappy and dangerous job for their country, thats it. Doesnt depict them as saints, no, or savages, but I think its balanced, imho.

The notion that Spielberg? is on some crusade to show a movie that is biased against Jews I think is ludicrous on its face.

...As for the rest of the list, I will take a pass.

FiLtH · « **Reply #13 on:** March 05, 2006, 07:27:44 PM »

Its the obvious attempt at "normalizing" the lifestyle by Hollywood that turns so many people off.

"Lets see...how can we attack the image of good ol boy macho? Lets take the old standard of toughness...the cowboy..and make him gay. That way whenever anyone sees a cowboy in the future, they wont think of John Wayne, they will ask...I wonder if he is gay?"

Delirium · « **Reply #14 on:** March 05, 2006, 08:16:50 PM »

Hollywood pretty smart to nominate movies the average joe doesn't agree with, it creates controversy, headlines, and later ratings for the show.

Some of these people have spent their whole life studying what will draw people in... they are performing their job admirably.

In the end, who cares... I vote for the best movie with my dollar, when i see it at the movie and buy the DVD.