Author Topic: Having marijuana ON your house is not illegal (Read 739 times)

nirvana · « **Reply #15 on:** March 19, 2006, 02:01:57 PM »

What drediock said, you can't really get high on "industrial" hemp. The kids around here love to buy hemp necklaces and what not. And for the record i've never touched the marijuana.

Curval · « **Reply #16 on:** March 19, 2006, 02:20:43 PM »

My post was not accusing you guys of anything. I am well aware of the differences between industrial vs recreational MJ.

But, the reason I mentioned Dow Chemical is that they led the charge against MJ, using it's supposed narocotic aspect to get it made illegal and to ensure a market for their synthetic rope and fibres.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #17 on:** March 19, 2006, 02:35:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
The US Constitution was written on Hemp paper.

The original Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are currently housed in the National Archives. All three are written on parchment, not hemp paper. Parchment is treated animal skin, typically sheepskin.

xrtoronto · « **Reply #18 on:** March 19, 2006, 06:02:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by nirvana
What drediock said, you can't really get high on "industrial" hemp. The kids around here love to buy hemp necklaces and what not. And for the record i've never touched the marijuana.

I smoked it; but I didn't inhale;)

rpm · « **Reply #19 on:** March 19, 2006, 11:03:06 PM »

I've smoked, ate, inhaled and ingested. The prohibition on hemp and MJ is just plain stupid. GRASS is a great film documenting the fight against MJ in America. I highly recommend watching it before you form your final opinion on the subject.

B@tfinkV · « **Reply #20 on:** March 19, 2006, 11:17:37 PM »

the single damaging factor for cannabis users is when one's mind becomes addicted.

other than that, MJ is totaly harmless, if you dont mind being lazy, smelly and poor.

nirvana · « **Reply #21 on:** March 19, 2006, 11:22:31 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Curval
My post was not accusing you guys of anything. I am well aware of the differences between industrial vs recreational MJ.

But, the reason I mentioned Dow Chemical is that they led the charge against MJ, using it's supposed narocotic aspect to get it made illegal and to ensure a market for their synthetic rope and fibres.

And Jello Biafra used it's industrial form to rally people to support the legalization of marijuana in general;)

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #22 on:** March 19, 2006, 11:29:20 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by B@tfinkV

other than that, MJ is totaly harmless, if you dont mind being lazy, smelly and poor.

Propaganda, and poor propaganda at that.

While I gave it as well as most othe things up a long time ago.
About all I do now is have a drink now and again. but even thats pretty rare. LOL a 6 pack would last me probably a couple months.

I know a whoooole lot of people that still do smoke pot. The very vast majority are hard working upper middle class and upperclass people. None are lazy,smelly or by any stretch of the imagination,poor.

On the other hand, I know alot of people who who dont do it at all who are are, poor ,lazy and smelly.

Pot, is no worse then beer or wine. I wouldnt even put it in the hard liquor catagory.
And in fact I'd trust much more someone high on pot then someone drunk on booze any day of the week.
Its not even a close competition.

B@tfinkV · « **Reply #23 on:** March 19, 2006, 11:46:38 PM »

was only a joke dred

i've been everything from an occasional smoker to smoking 5-10 joints a day, so i'm not speaking from a viewpoint of ignorance here, just making a joke from an informed possition.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #24 on:** March 20, 2006, 12:27:43 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by B@tfinkV
was only a joke dred

i've been everything from an occasional smoker to smoking 5-10 joints a day, so i'm not speaking from a viewpoint of ignorance here, just making a joke from an informed possition.

Ahhhhh
Sorry bout dat cheif

Suave · « **Reply #25 on:** March 20, 2006, 09:43:52 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Curval
My post was not accusing you guys of anything. I am well aware of the differences between industrial vs recreational MJ.

But, the reason I mentioned Dow Chemical is that they led the charge against MJ, using it's supposed narocotic aspect to get it made illegal and to ensure a market for their synthetic rope and fibres.

That's a little ironic considering that Dow makes napalm.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #26 on:** March 20, 2006, 12:55:57 PM »

From what I've read and seen, both sides of the argument give biased and skewed facts.

Take everything you read with a grain of salt.

Maverick · « **Reply #27 on:** March 20, 2006, 09:23:47 PM »

I have a couple questions for those who imbibe with marijuana for "recreational use".

Do you have kids and smoke around them or in their sight?

When will you provide your kids their first dose?

OOZ662 · « **Reply #28 on:** March 20, 2006, 10:59:57 PM »

No wonder AH gets kinda creepy at night.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #29 on:** March 21, 2006, 06:24:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
The original Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are currently housed in the National Archives. All three are written on parchment, not hemp paper. Parchment is treated animal skin, typically sheepskin.

This is the first time anyone has mentioned this Holden.

Karaya