Eagler,
That 62-year old woman could probably count no worse then you did. I could name you any number of reasons why she could want to have a baby. None of them concern anyone but herself and her physician.
fscott,
All the arguments about clones that you presented are as valid with "clones" replaced by "babies".
All the abuse that can be done to clones can be done to the normally produced babies/fetuses - including feeding them to the starving people or doing experimants.
That would be bad reason for outlawing procreation.
In fact, most people that intend to produce a clone plan to love and cherish him/her, not use for barbeque.
There may be quite beneficial applications to cloning. Look how popular and beloved the former president Clinton is, despite some admitted lack of moral judgement on his part. Unfortunately we cannot reelect him for the third term.
If you produce a set of clones from him, you could legally have
a Mr. Clinton as a president forever. Even better then the original one because the parents would know what to watch for during the upbringing...

miko