House Passes Protections for the Unborn

[Eagler]

First step in stopping the endless slaughter of the unborn:
 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,17175,00.html

Pro "choicers" watch out !!!

Eagler

[Sturm]

 http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum4/HTML/002017.html

Just for you Eagler

[miko2d]

 For a prospective parent who did not intend to have abortion, loss of a fetus is a loss of a child.

 If we do have an irrational system where the result of the action is judged rather then the action itself or even intent, the harm done to a prospective parent as a result of a loss of a fetus is quite real and should be accounted for.
 It could probably have been done more reasonably as rights of pregnant women then rights of the fetuses though.

 Wether this will be used as a pretext to interfere into our right to choose, we will see.

[1776]

Sad to say, but the Senate will stop this bill

[Sturm]

I guess pretty soon you all want bills stating what time of night you can have sex at too?  I am sorry but I for one do not support this,taking away more rights an individual has is wrong.  I guess you all want the assisted suicide ban as well?  Freakin tree huggers  

[Ripsnort]

 

Originally posted by Sturm:
I am sorry but I for one do not support this,taking away more rights an individual has is wrong.  I guess you all want the assisted suicide ban as well?  Freakin tree huggers  

And what of the rights of the unborn child?

[Sandman_SBM]

Good! I hope the Senate squashes this.

 

[Sandman_SBM]

 

[Sandman_SBM]

 
 http://www.protectchoice.org

[1776]

Rip, they will tell ya that it's not a child, it's just a glob of stuff.  It's not human.

The real question is when is it(glob of stuff) human?

I say conception.  What say you?

Choice is the option before conception



[This message has been edited by 1776 (edited 04-27-2001).]

[Dowding]

It's ok sandman. Because back-street abortions are less visible, the 'pro-life' people can pretend that the problem is solved.

What's out of sight, is out of mind.

[Sturm]

 

Originally posted by Ripsnort:
And what of the rights of the unborn child?

Key thing you said there is unborn.  What of the rights?  What about the rights of the woman or family this pertains too?  And who are we to base or judge our sentiment on someone else's grief and or joy.  Is it wrong to abort a child that might cause the death of the mother?  Is it wrong to abort a child of a woman that was just brutally raped by a bunch of men?  A child born with birth known  painful birth defects and the family will not be able to afford medical attention so therefore making the child suffer its entire life?  

Stop and think for awhile it might hurt but just try it.  Rip this is not pointed at you but to everyone.  Selfishness is really starting to show.  I know all you pro-lifers are about to come un-glued but think of the others and their situation before you spew out your pictures and lies.  

And Sandman I think you are a little to attached to your TV.  Remember not everything they show is real, just a little tip for ya.    

[Sandman_SBM]

 

Originally posted by Sturm:
And Sandman I think you are a little to attached to your TV.

I don't own a television, Sturm.

[Sturm]

Sandman that makes 2 of us in VA that don't.

[Sandman_SBM]

Well... should have phrased that differently... I don't own a television, here in VA. I'm on a year-long training assignment. Left my television in California and I really haven't watched TV at all in six months other than the occasional glimpse of sporting events in various bars.

WRT to the pro-choice posters, I've seen them on the Metro here in DC. http://www.protectchoice.org