Author Topic: AT&T packet loss  (Read 508 times)

Offline 38ruk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2121
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
AT&T packet loss
« on: March 30, 2006, 01:38:36 AM »
Hey skuzzy , i seem to be having some packet loss at AT&T , any suggestions ? thx



« Last Edit: March 30, 2006, 01:49:57 AM by 38ruk »

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2006, 09:17:57 AM »
Is it constantly happening or has it calmed down?
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline 38ruk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2121
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2006, 09:48:31 AM »
Nope it's still at it , looks like the route has changed towards the end . One question , how often does AH2 update ingame, every second, or is it in milliseconds?  I'm running pingplotter at a 2.5 second ping interval , is that too fast ?  Thx


« Last Edit: March 30, 2006, 09:54:05 AM by 38ruk »

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2006, 03:06:20 AM »
Oh man - I've been having that crap for the last 3-4 days. I'll see if I can dig up some plots.

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2006, 03:16:10 AM »

Offline 38ruk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2121
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2006, 08:02:11 AM »
How's your like to the MA waffle , i see your pinging the ip for all the other servers (AVA , DA ect. ect.).It's funny , ive only noticed the issue for the last 4-5 days .

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2006, 12:37:28 PM »
Yeah about last 4-5 days theres times when the whole net just slows down - actually took over 20 seconds one day to load this bullitin board..lol

I would fly over a feild strafing ack in a niki....didn't kill a one...figured my connex getting porked.






« Last Edit: March 31, 2006, 12:39:29 PM by Waffle »

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2006, 01:45:35 PM »
Heya Waffle.  Check this out.  I traced to your second hop IP address and look what happened.

traceroute to 208.180.23.145 (208.180.23.145), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  206.16.60.33 (206.16.60.33)  0.655 ms  0.513 ms  0.475 ms
 2  mdf1-gsr12-1-gig-1-0.dal1.attens.net (63.241.192.249)  0.195 ms  0.192 ms  0.150 ms
 3  gar1-p310.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.255.173)  0.962 ms  0.932 ms  0.906 ms
 4  tbr2-p013801.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.123.17.62)  2.269 ms  2.404 ms  2.702 ms
 5  gbr6-p40.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.12.90)  31.179 ms  1.363 ms  21.478 ms
 6  gar3-p370.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.123.17.53)  1.565 ms  1.589 ms  1.100 ms
 7  12.119.145.126 (12.119.145.126)  1.398 ms  1.372 ms  1.344 ms
 8  dllsdsrj01-so000.rd.dl.cox.net (68.1.0.145)  1.368 ms  1.365 ms  1.339 ms
 9  68.1.206.38 (68.1.206.38)  3.378 ms 68.1.206.6 (68.1.206.6)  172.587 ms 68.1.206.38 (68.1.206.38)  8.972 ms
10  bcstbbrc01-gew0501.ma.dl.cox-internet.com (66.76.45.146)  8.570 ms bcstbbrc02-gew0501.ma.dl.cox-internet.com (66.76.45.150)  5.215 ms bcstbbrc01-gew0501.ma.dl.cox-internet.com (66.76.45.146)  8.454 ms
11  cdm-208-180-23-130.bcst.cox-internet.com (208.180.23.130)  8.793 ms * *
12  10.20.0.1 (10.20.0.1)  7.793 ms *  7.795 ms

The IP address 10.20.0.1 should never show up in a trace, unless it is from the source.  Pretty cool.  I have not seen one those in a long time.  Might want to point your ISP at this post.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2006, 01:49:28 PM »
Now 38ruk, your trace is more typical.  Here it is back your second hop.
==

traceroute to 69.95.14.65 (69.95.14.65), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  206.16.60.33 (206.16.60.33)  0.625 ms  0.535 ms  0.477 ms
 2  mdf1-gsr12-1-gig-1-2.dal1.attens.net (63.241.192.205)  0.370 ms  0.219 ms  0.202 ms
 3  gar1-p310.kc9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.255.173)  1.034 ms  0.935 ms  0.916 ms
 4  tbr2-p013801.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.123.17.62)  2.494 ms  2.569 ms  2.184 ms
 5  ggr1-p370.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.123.16.245)  1.046 ms  1.090 ms  0.985 ms
 6  IPP-dllstx9lce1-pos5-0.wcg.net (64.200.232.201)  1.731 ms  1.827 ms  1.714 ms
 7  dllstx1wcx2-pos11-2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.105.45)  1.992 ms  1.976 ms  1.802 ms
 8  dllstx1wcx3-pos9-0-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.110.74)  1.847 ms  1.875 ms  2.111 ms
 9  hstntx1wcx3-pos1-0-oc192.wcg.net (64.200.210.66)  6.691 ms  6.714 ms  6.675 ms
10  hstntx1wcx2-pos6-0.wcg.net (64.200.186.77)  6.794 ms  6.841 ms  6.664 ms
11  drvlga1wcx2-pos12-0.wcg.net (64.200.240.78)  222.500 ms  186.309 ms  204.855 ms
12  hrndva1wcx3-pos14-0-oc192.wcg.net (64.200.210.238)  30.977 ms  31.164 ms  31.020 ms
13  hrndva1wcx2-pos4-0-oc192.wcg.net (64.200.89.121)  31.954 ms  32.884 ms  31.588 ms
14  nycmny2wcx2-pos1-0-oc192.wcg.net (64.200.210.177)  37.425 ms  37.425 ms  37.298 ms
15  nycmny2wcx3-pos11-3.wcg.net (64.200.68.98)  37.242 ms  37.253 ms  37.181 ms
16  nycmny1wce2-pos3-0.wcg.net (64.200.68.102)  37.554 ms  37.468 ms  37.586 ms
17  nycmny1wce2-choiceone-5-0.wcg.net (65.77.98.82)  46.100 ms  46.145 ms  46.173 ms
18  66.202.102.190 (66.202.102.190)  45.784 ms  45.837 ms *

Note the last hop IP address and note what I actually traced to.  Also note it is an asynchronous route.  Meaning, if the packet loss was really at the hop you indicate, it would have shown up in my trace.  But due to the route back to your ISP being different than the one taken to the server, you cannot see where the actualy issue lies.

Of course, the really silly thing in this trace is how AT&T routes all outbound data to Kansas City, regardless of its destination, then from there back to Texas again.  OY!!!!  And no, they will not change it.  They consider this to be efficient. :furious
« Last Edit: March 31, 2006, 01:51:36 PM by Skuzzy »
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2006, 02:01:31 PM »
I winged them an email with a link to this thread...will see what happens.

So what's the big deal with the 10.20.0.1?

Do I save more on long distance if I dial that? :D

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2006, 02:42:34 PM »
LOL!

The 10.x.x.x Class A IP address is not routable over the Internet.  They are meant to be used for internal LAN use only.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline 38ruk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2121
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2006, 04:46:51 PM »
LOL from dallas to kansas city back to dallas ? Thats nuts lol.  Thx for the trace back Skuz , basically that access number is now crossed off my list .  I have many different routes i can take . I have a whole area code worth of numbers , with like 5 different routes , so ill find the next best one and check it . If  i email you another route , think you could do a trace back to me again?? Pretty please 8)  thx 38

Offline IronDog

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2006, 07:03:07 PM »
Bring back the other outfit,at least they tried.My con has went to heck.
IronDog

Offline 38ruk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2121
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2006, 11:03:22 PM »
Hey skuzzy , here are 2 other routes i can take . Can you check them for an asynchronous route please . Guess dial up has one advantage. My cable Co is supossed to have my street wired any day , good by dialup hell , well i better wait and see what the cable route is like heh.   THX 38

 Target Name: N/A
         IP: 206.16.60.39
  Date/Time: 3/31/2006 11:56:37 AM to 3/31/2006 11:57:00 AM

 1  106 ms  112 ms  108 ms  105 ms  108 ms  112 ms  108 ms  110 ms  108 ms  107 ms  nas50.chicago3.il.us.da.qwest .net [63.152.11.26]
 2  107 ms  104 ms  107 ms  105 ms  114 ms  127 ms  114 ms  105 ms  103 ms  106 ms  [63.152.30.254]
 3  124 ms  112 ms  125 ms  118 ms  105 ms  195 ms  110 ms  119 ms  111 ms  124 ms  cer-edge-02.inet.qwest.net [63.152.125.25]
 4  117 ms  108 ms  123 ms  109 ms  122 ms  114 ms  127 ms  115 ms  128 ms  121 ms  cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.139.85]
 5  108 ms  121 ms  115 ms  126 ms  114 ms  127 ms  119 ms  127 ms  125 ms  133 ms  cer-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.139.62]
 6  128 ms  120 ms  129 ms  120 ms  108 ms  127 ms  114 ms  253 ms  220 ms  294 ms  qwest-gw.cgcil.ip.att.net [192.205.32.97]
 7  155 ms  141 ms  161 ms  148 ms  163 ms  153 ms  161 ms  154 ms  176 ms  159 ms  tbr2-p014001.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.70]
 8  146 ms  159 ms  152 ms  165 ms  156 ms  165 ms  158 ms  143 ms  162 ms  145 ms  tbr2-cl7.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.46]
 9  161 ms  155 ms  162 ms  156 ms  141 ms  161 ms  147 ms  177 ms  147 ms  159 ms  tbr1-cl24.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.9.141]
10  156 ms  141 ms  161 ms  147 ms  163 ms  153 ms  160 ms  156 ms  168 ms  156 ms  tbr2-cl6.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90]
11  146 ms  159 ms  151 ms  166 ms  154 ms  164 ms  159 ms  171 ms  160 ms  173 ms  gbr1-p70.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.12.78]
12  150 ms  136 ms  150 ms  143 ms  128 ms  147 ms  135 ms  150 ms  134 ms  154 ms  gar1-p360.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.233]
13  142 ms  128 ms  146 ms  134 ms  150 ms  135 ms  147 ms  141 ms  152 ms  145 ms  mdf1-gsr12-2-pos-7-0.dal1.attens.net [12.122.255.170]
14  135 ms  148 ms  161 ms  156 ms  142 ms  154 ms  147 ms  132 ms  148 ms  134 ms  [63.241.192.50]
15  145 ms  137 ms  151 ms  142 ms  151 ms  149 ms  136 ms  144 ms  136 ms  149 ms  [206.16.60.39]

Ping statistics for 206.16.60.39
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0.0%)
Round Trip Times: Minimum = 136ms, Maximum = 151ms, Average = 144ms






Target Name: N/A
         IP: 206.16.60.39
  Date/Time: 3/31/2006 11:53:30 AM to 3/31/2006 11:53:53 AM

 1  120 ms  122 ms  113 ms  120 ms  122 ms  118 ms  126 ms  124 ms  119 ms  120 ms  roc1-dial2.popsite.net [64.24.144.3]
 2  115 ms  112 ms  114 ms  111 ms  111 ms  113 ms  116 ms  113 ms  114 ms  114 ms  roc1-core1-f0-0.starnetusa.net [64.24.144.1]
 3  115 ms  112 ms  119 ms  115 ms  112 ms  114 ms  117 ms  111 ms  113 ms  115 ms  ag-uslecroc-gigabitethernet9-34.rocny01.paetec.net [63.246.207.57]
 4  148 ms  143 ms  145 ms  137 ms  138 ms  143 ms  139 ms  140 ms  141 ms  144 ms  bb-vlan2-et1-1.rocny01.paetec.net [66.155.216.2]
 5  136 ms  136 ms  141 ms  136 ms  132 ms  137 ms  136 ms  138 ms  133 ms  N/A     bb-oc12chi01-so6-0.chiil01.paetec.net [64.80.254.193]
 6  134 ms  132 ms  133 ms  130 ms  126 ms  132 ms  139 ms  127 ms  128 ms  154 ms  bb-vlan2-eth2-0-0.chiil01.paetec.net [66.155.191.4]
 7  133 ms  130 ms  132 ms  128 ms  130 ms  142 ms  129 ms  130 ms  126 ms  128 ms  [12.118.183.57]
 8  155 ms  159 ms  153 ms  157 ms  148 ms  159 ms  151 ms  153 ms  149 ms  N/A     tbr2-p010901.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.6]
 9  153 ms  153 ms  149 ms  151 ms  147 ms  149 ms  153 ms  153 ms  155 ms  N/A     tbr2-cl7.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.46]
10  156 ms  159 ms  156 ms  150 ms  147 ms  168 ms  151 ms  148 ms  160 ms  N/A     tbr1-cl24.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.9.141]
11  155 ms  152 ms  165 ms  156 ms  152 ms  164 ms  151 ms  147 ms  183 ms  N/A     tbr2-cl6.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90]
12  156 ms  159 ms  171 ms  157 ms  150 ms  152 ms  154 ms  158 ms  174 ms  N/A     gbr2-p100.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.12.82]
13  153 ms  150 ms  176 ms  153 ms  150 ms  151 ms  148 ms  149 ms  157 ms  N/A     gar1-p370.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.237]
14  153 ms  150 ms  171 ms  153 ms  149 ms  156 ms  153 ms  150 ms  151 ms  N/A     mdf1-gsr12-2-pos-7-0.dal1.attens.net [12.122.255.170]
15  155 ms  151 ms  163 ms  155 ms  148 ms  153 ms  151 ms  152 ms  153 ms  N/A     mdf1-bi8k-1-eth-2-2.dal1.attens.net [63.241.192.226]
16  153 ms  150 ms  147 ms  153 ms  155 ms  152 ms  148 ms  146 ms  157 ms  N/A     [206.16.60.39]

Ping statistics for 206.16.60.39
Packets: Sent = 9, Received = 9, Lost = 0 (0.0%)
Round Trip Times: Minimum = 146ms, Maximum = 157ms, Average = 151ms

Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
AT&T packet loss
« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2006, 12:37:41 PM »
Well here's you answer on the AT&T routing:

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=175160


lol! :D I think the NSA is still holding some of my AH packets.....lmao!