Author Topic: US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?  (Read 3992 times)

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« on: April 08, 2006, 08:24:37 AM »
US considers use of nuclear weapons against Iran

Quote
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The administration of     President George W. Bush is planning a massive bombing campaign against     Iran, including use of bunker-buster nuclear bombs to destroy a key Iranian suspected nuclear weapons facility, The New Yorker magazine has reported in its April 17 issue.

ADVERTISEMENT
 
The article by investigative journalist Seymour Hersh said that Bush and others in the White House have come to view Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a potential Adolf Hitler.

"That's the name they're using," the report quoted a former senior intelligence official as saying.

A senior unnamed     Pentagon adviser is quoted in the article as saying that "this White House believes that the only way to solve the problem is to change the power structure in Iran, and that means war."

The former intelligence officials depicts planning as "enormous," "hectic" and "operational," Hersh writes.

One former defense official said the military planning was premised on a belief that "a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government," The New Yorker pointed out.

In recent weeks, the president has quietly initiated a series of talks on plans for Iran with a few key senators and members of the House of Representatives, including at least one Democrat, the report said.

One of the options under consideration involves the possible use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, to insure the destruction of Iran's main centrifuge plant at Natanz, Hersh writes.

But the former senior intelligence official said the attention given to the nuclear option has created serious misgivings inside the military, and some officers have talked about resigning after an attempt to remove the nuclear option from the evolving war plans in Iran failed, according to the report.

"There are very strong sentiments within the military against brandishing nuclear weapons against other countries," the magazine quotes the Pentagon adviser as saying.

The adviser warned that bombing Iran could provoke "a chain reaction" of attacks on American facilities and citizens throughout the world and might also reignite Hezbollah.

"If we go, the southern half of     Iraq will light up like a candle," the adviser is quoted as telling The New Yorker.
[/b]

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2006, 08:36:42 AM »
Wow, such incredible facts from the illustrious Seymour Hersh, published in The New Yorker, that paragon of journalism.

It's a contingency plan. They have them for EVERYTHING. There are entire departments who do nothing but dream up scenarios and formulate contingency plans to respond to them, regardless of how far fetched the scenario actually is.

REAL NEWS there, what a freaking scoop.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline WhiteHawk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1815
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2006, 10:09:06 AM »
I think we should at least finish 1 of the 2 wars that we are in now before we embark on another boogey man bash.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2006, 11:34:05 AM »
"investigative journalist Seymour Hersh ","A senior unnamed Pentagon adviser ","One former defense official ".

by george, i think we have solid proof here that hitler..er i mean booosh is going to nuke iran.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13919
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2006, 11:40:48 AM »
Everyone who ever served in the military and left it is a "former defense official".
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2006, 11:44:38 AM »
"One former defense official said the military planning was premised on a belief that "a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government," The New Yorker pointed out."

Has this EVER worked? :confused:

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2006, 11:52:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk
I think we should at least finish 1 of the 2 wars that we are in now before we embark on another boogey man bash.


Oh heck, in the case of Iran, one nuke might start and end a war with one quick bomb drop.
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline fartwinkle

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 551
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2006, 11:59:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
"One former defense official said the military planning was premised on a belief that "a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government," The New Yorker pointed out."

Has this EVER worked? :confused:


Hiroshima and Nagasaki so yea I think it will work just dandy.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2006, 12:14:04 PM »
Operation PlowShare comes to mind...:O


Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2006, 12:18:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by fartwinkle
Hiroshima and Nagasaki so yea I think it will work just dandy.


Really? I dont recall the japanese people rising up against the government, not after the 4 year long disaterous war, not after a few good years of conventional fire bombing, not even with threat of imminent invasion, and not even after the two nucler bombs..

Lets see, air attack didnt cause popolar rebellion against any of the following governemts:

British
German
Japanese
North Korean
North Vietnamese
Iraqi
Serbian

Did I miss any? Why do we think it would do so in Iran?

Offline Mitchell

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #10 on: April 08, 2006, 12:23:03 PM »
April 17th..... ??????????????



top of the article

Offline RAIDER14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2554
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2006, 12:32:39 PM »
Quote
US considers use of nuclear weapons against Iran


:cool: cool now the middle east can have a Grand Canyon to:lol

Offline dmf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2920
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #12 on: April 08, 2006, 12:52:45 PM »
I'm not a military stargitist or anything, but I remember history class when my teacher told us that in WW2 Hitler fought too many fronts at one time, If I remember correctly Germany lost WW2, so I could be wrong, but it seems to me that if we fight too many fronts at one time won't we lose too?

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #13 on: April 08, 2006, 01:18:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by dmf
I'm not a military stargitist or anything, but I remember history class when my teacher told us that in WW2 Hitler fought too many fronts at one time, If I remember correctly Germany lost WW2, so I could be wrong, but it seems to me that if we fight too many fronts at one time won't we lose too?



this is not WW2, you do not fight a new war by the tactics of the last war.

Offline Schwein

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 66
US to use nuclear weapons against Iran?
« Reply #14 on: April 08, 2006, 01:42:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by dmf
I'm not a military stargitist or anything, but I remember history class when my teacher told us that in WW2 Hitler fought too many fronts at one time, If I remember correctly Germany lost WW2, so I could be wrong, but it seems to me that if we fight too many fronts at one time won't we lose too?




Quote
Originally posted by john9001
this is not WW2, you do not fight a new war by the tactics of the last war.


Seems like you are fighting your new wars with the tactics of the losing pary of the "last war" you won (WWII). This far you don't seem to be any more successful either.