Author Topic: CT Buffs  (Read 1183 times)

Offline Boxboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
CT Buffs
« on: April 08, 2006, 07:53:15 PM »
If the CT buffs are ANYTHING like the Buffs in the MA I doubt I will be playing long.

I just tried to attack a box of 17's at 27,000 feet I was co alt in a Dora I tried EVERY angle of attack and the 17's were SOOO fast and SOOO accurate from EVERY angle that finally on high 45 degree attack he shot off my elevators and vert stab with his WAIST guns.

As far as I am concerned after this experiment all the arguing about bullet travel etc is just plain bunk....the bomber gun lethality is higher than regular .50 cals period and EVERYONE knows it.
Sub Lt BigJim
801 Sqn FAA
Pilot

Offline B@tfinkV

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5751
CT Buffs
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2006, 07:55:41 PM »
its the concentraion of fire and the deadly accuracy of unmanned gunns that causes the trouble for less experienced buff killers.


honestly if i have more than 2k alt over a box of buffs of any make, i will put down my house in betting i will destroy 2  out of 3 while taking no hits.





a 50cal is a 50cal in this game, im pretty sure all hit the same.
 400 yrds on my tail, right where i want you... [/size]

Offline RTSigma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
CT Buffs
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2006, 08:04:10 PM »
Just like in WW2, single plane attacks on masses of boxed bombers was nearly suicide. Going in from 12 o clock offered the best percentage to kill the pilots.

Just remember, just because you're going up against a bomber group, does not mean you're going to win.

Sigma of VF-17 JOLLY ROGERS

Offline LYNX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2263
Re: CT Buffs
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2006, 09:24:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boxboy
If the CT buffs are ANYTHING like the Buffs in the MA I doubt I will be playing long.

I just tried to attack a box of 17's at 27,000 feet I was co alt  


1st) Mistake Co Alt
2nd) Mistake you had a couple of goes at them
3rd) Mistake ..no patience to alt over the formation.

TIP ........ Always dive on bombers.  Get nasty with it go for the head shot lol but pass underneath extend forward loop over and repeat :aok

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
CT Buffs
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2006, 09:50:37 PM »
Bat speaks the truth. Level bombers at alt are the best weapons platform in the game.
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline mars01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4148
CT Buffs
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2006, 09:55:59 PM »
9 out of 10 times I don't have a problem with Buffs, stay high dive down fast hit em where it kills em.  If you pick em apart piece by piece you are going to die.

Offline SAS_KID

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1098
      • http://www.myspace.com/saskid
Re: CT Buffs
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2006, 10:10:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boxboy
If the CT buffs are ANYTHING like the Buffs in the MA I doubt I will be playing long.

I just tried to attack a box of 17's at 27,000 feet I was co alt.


Worst thing you could have done


 
Quote
Originally posted by Boxboy
As far as I am concerned after this experiment all the arguing about bullet travel etc is just plain bunk....the bomber gun lethality is higher than regular .50 cals period and EVERYONE knows it.


dude think about it at least 12 50 cals firing hundreds of shots a second ur guna die weeeeetard.
Quote from: hitech on Today at 09:27:26 AM
What utter and compete BS, quite frankly I should kick you off this bbs for this post.

The real truth is you do not like the answer.

HiTech

Offline Boxboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
Re: Re: CT Buffs
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2006, 02:07:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SAS_KID
Worst thing you could have done


 
 

dude think about it at least 12 50 cals firing hundreds of shots a second ur guna die weeeeetard.


Well Dud if you had read the post you would see that I tried every attack I could WITHOUT being dead six OR allowing all the guns to concentrate

WHICH dud is my point he DIDN't hit me with thousands of rounds he hit me with a FEW rounds which did more damage than a 20mm cannon
Sub Lt BigJim
801 Sqn FAA
Pilot

Offline Flayed1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1091
CT Buffs
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2006, 05:34:35 AM »
I would say that attacking 3 B-17's is a bad idea as a single plane a 27K.
  The B-17 reaches 300mph at 30K so you were almost at it's top speed and at 27K I would say your plane would be handling like a dead fish, just catching them and being sluggish. While the bombers are at alt and cruising waiting for you to make a pass.    

 At the very least I would get a 152, spit-14, P51 or P38 up to chase them down and even then it would not be the best thing to do alone..
From the ashes of the old we rise to fly again. Behold The Phoenix Wing!

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
CT Buffs
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2006, 06:15:10 AM »
i dont know if it has been changed, but i think a big part of it is lack of dispersion on bomber guns
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4589
Re: Re: Re: CT Buffs
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2006, 07:47:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boxboy
Well Dud if you had read the post you would see that I tried every attack I could WITHOUT being dead six OR allowing all the guns to concentrate

WHICH dud is my point he DIDN't hit me with thousands of rounds he hit me with a FEW rounds which did more damage than a 20mm cannon


Why drag me into this???:huh



















:p
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline navajoboy

  • Probation
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
      • http://www.uknightedstates.net
Re: Re: Re: Re: CT Buffs
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2006, 07:51:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boxboy
Well Dud if you had read the post you would see that I tried every attack I could WITHOUT being dead six OR allowing all the guns to concentrate

WHICH dud is my point he DIDN't hit me with thousands of rounds he hit me with a FEW rounds which did more damage than a 20mm cannon


Quote
Originally posted by SuperDud
Why drag me into this???:huh

your like toliet paper dud.. you get dragged into alot of things....

















:p
Stovpipe aka Navajo
Uknighted 357th FG - JG26
-+= Foreign Relations Minister =+-
http://www.uknightedstates.net

Offline Boxboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
CT Buffs
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2006, 09:56:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Flayed1
I would say that attacking 3 B-17's is a bad idea as a single plane a 27K.
  The B-17 reaches 300mph at 30K so you were almost at it's top speed and at 27K I would say your plane would be handling like a dead fish, just catching them and being sluggish. While the bombers are at alt and cruising waiting for you to make a pass.    

 At the very least I would get a 152, spit-14, P51 or P38 up to chase them down and even then it would not be the best thing to do alone..


Give me a break the bombers reach max speed at 2 feet, they are like jets screaming across the sky.  I see a dot screaming along soon I see a box of bombers.

As for attacking alone you are right, when HT implemented the "box" he needed to tone down the "otto gunners" abit but this is not the case as far as I can see, and in CT you have LOTS of AI gunners if what I read is correct and man I can't see how ANY fighter formation will be able to attack that.
Sub Lt BigJim
801 Sqn FAA
Pilot

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
CT Buffs
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2006, 10:41:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boxboy
man I can't see how ANY fighter formation will be able to attack that.


There will, supposedly, be a lot more planes involved, and the shear numbers of attacking fighters will likely be the saving grace for the LW.

But yeah, formations in CT would suck mightily. Hope they take a slightly more realistic (or at least different) approach in that regard.
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline Booz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
Re: CT Buffs
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2006, 11:56:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boxboy
If the CT buffs are ANYTHING like the Buffs in the MA I doubt I will be playing long.

I just tried to attack a box of 17's at 27,000 feet I was co alt in a Dora I tried EVERY angle of attack and the 17's were SOOO fast and SOOO accurate from EVERY angle that finally on high 45 degree attack he shot off my elevators and vert stab with his WAIST guns.

As far as I am concerned after this experiment all the arguing about bullet travel etc is just plain bunk....the bomber gun lethality is higher than regular .50 cals period and EVERYONE knows it.


 You might not cut it in CT