Author Topic: Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea  (Read 911 times)

Offline Revor

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 91
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« on: April 15, 2006, 09:01:27 AM »
I say this because there's a lot of people that doesnt know how to land on carriers therefore making the battle a lot shorter and more difficult to find enemy targets. The majority of the time in the pacific the land fighters win because of this. People try to land on carriers they either crash or lose parts while landing therefore ending their flight when they try to refuel or rearm.

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2006, 09:04:06 AM »
Ohhhkaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay....

Moving swiftly along.... ;)
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10227
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2006, 09:06:04 AM »
My guns are hard to aim when I drink that beer stuff!! WTF I want lazer range finders and sharks with frickin lazer beems!
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2006, 09:48:59 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Revor
I say this because there's a lot of people that doesnt know how to land on carriers therefore making the battle a lot shorter and more difficult to find enemy targets. The majority of the time in the pacific the land fighters win because of this. People try to land on carriers they either crash or lose parts while landing therefore ending their flight when they try to refuel or rearm.


Well, bring these people to the TA and we'll teach them how to land on a carrier, and take off again. There's usually a CV right next to A1, and if not I can jump one there in a blink.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2006, 09:50:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Morpheus
My guns are hard to aim when I drink that beer stuff!! B]


I have a cure for that. Just keep drinking. In no time at all you will 1,2 sometimes 3 or 4 of the same target to shoot at. You can`t miss.
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline FiLtH

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6448
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2006, 10:08:02 AM »
Im sure they could make island in there that you could rearm at somewhere. But for those that cant land on a carrier, it isnt hard, just takes practice.

~AoM~

Offline doobs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1605
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #6 on: April 15, 2006, 11:10:37 AM »
Shift G
R.I.P JG44
(founding XO)

68KO always remembered

Offline daddog

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15082
      • http://www.332nd.org
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #7 on: April 15, 2006, 11:12:28 AM »
Practice, and when you become competent you too can earn this.
Big Fat Dog Award


Awarded to any member who can take off and land three times in a row, (without splashing) from a CV in a F4U-D with 100% fuel, rockets, and 2-1000lb bombs. No easy task!
Most in my squad have it. We are not afraid of a Pacific Squad Ops. ;)

For all our squad awards go here.
http://www.332nd.org/commendations.htm
Noses in the wind since 1997
332nd Flying Mongrels
daddog
Knowing for Sure

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #8 on: April 15, 2006, 11:37:16 AM »
I regularly land and re-arm my P47N on cv's--I can usually get it stopped before I run past the last wire. (Only in fighter mode, not enough deck to get it off with bombs)
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Schutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1138
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2006, 11:52:06 AM »
I think historically fighters dumped any excess ord before landing on the carrier, to get your award you landing with ord or dumping / rearming?

Offline BBQ_Bob

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
      • http://uknightedstates.net
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2006, 11:58:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by daddog
Practice, and when you become competent you too can earn this.
Big Fat Dog Award


Awarded to any member who can take off and land three times in a row, (without splashing) from a CV in a F4U-D with 100% fuel, rockets, and 2-1000lb bombs. No easy task!
Most in my squad have it. We are not afraid of a Pacific Squad Ops. ;)

For all our squad awards go here.
http://www.332nd.org/commendations.htm



Hey your plane has boobs. :aok
UKNIGHTED Propaganda Minister
"There are no Hells Angels in the MA, never"

"they are nowhere near the airport ..they are lost in the desert...they can not read a compass...they are retarded."

For a good time ~~ www.uknightedstates.net

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #11 on: April 15, 2006, 12:01:20 PM »
you can take SB's out quickly rearming a b26 on cv
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #12 on: April 15, 2006, 12:14:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by daddog
Practice, and when you become competent you too can earn this.
Big Fat Dog Award


Awarded to any member who can take off and land three times in a row, (without splashing) from a CV in a F4U-D with 100% fuel, rockets, and 2-1000lb bombs. No easy task!
Most in my squad have it. We are not afraid of a Pacific Squad Ops. ;)

For all our squad awards go here.
http://www.332nd.org/commendations.htm


Actually, taking an F4U-1D off with a full load is VERY easy... 99% of the players simply don't know the ultra-simple secret.

Full Flaps..... That's it, drop full flaps while the engine is starting. Once the engine is running, go to full power with WEP. Retract the gear immediately and you WILL NOT lose any altitude.

I've heard all manner of methods discussed... But all fall short of simply using full flaps. Some people advocate dropping some flaps as they approach the bow.. Some advocate backing up, some suggest both.

However, the fact remains that simply using full flaps with WEP right from where the plane spawns is easy, simple and works every time.

Landing with a full load is just as easy.

I've got plenty of CV training films of this should anyone want to see how its done.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #13 on: April 15, 2006, 12:23:40 PM »
What WW said. Full flaps and it's practically a cakewalk. Jolly Rogers carrier quals are traditionally 5 takeoffs and landings filmed or witnessed by the qualifying dude. Full ord and fuel optional but recommended.

We awarded:

Then we got the new guy drunk and had our own version of a tailhook scandal.

Offline GunnerCAF

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
      • Gunner's Grange
Having FSO in the pacific is a bad idea
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2006, 12:28:32 PM »
I think landing a F4U on a CV is much easier then landing on a runway. Sounds like a good excuse to practice :)

Gear down, hook down, flaps full, add throttle to aim for the 3 wire.  On the deck, cut your throttle all the way back (off) so you don't roll backwards off the deck.

Gunner
Gunner
Cactus Air Force