Author Topic: F1 - Imola '06  (Read 476 times)

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
F1 - Imola '06
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2006, 09:51:34 AM »
Monaco is exciting because of the tight tolerances. Everyone knows that any driver could be knocked out of the race any time from the slightest mistake.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline indy007

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3294
F1 - Imola '06
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2006, 10:31:31 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
huh?


Just sayin', MS seemed to do a bit better before they yanked the V10's & went to standardized TCS :) Can't wait to see the new wings & slicks for '07. Now.. if they'd just bring back downforce fans we'd have some really, really fast cars in the corners.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
F1 - Imola '06
« Reply #17 on: April 25, 2006, 10:49:28 AM »
we need _less_ downforce indy :)

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
F1 - Imola '06
« Reply #18 on: April 25, 2006, 11:07:45 AM »
You also have that great oportunity to pass others at the end of the tunnel. If you fail, you may crash and give us some great entertainment.

Offline indy007

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3294
F1 - Imola '06
« Reply #19 on: April 25, 2006, 11:33:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
we need _less_ downforce indy :)


I disagree, but I'm a fan of unlimited classes :) If racing didn't keep outlawing logical advances (downforce fans, dynamic body surfaces) we'd have *really* fast cars... probably to the extent drivers couldn't phsyically be in the cars and we'd be cheering on our favorite team of engineers instead lol.

I mean, if they're still too fast & too grippy, why not drop back to 1.5L's? :)