Author Topic: Plane Wrecks (Read 1694 times)

GlacierGirl · « **on:** May 01, 2006, 09:17:22 AM »

I think I would be cool to have plane wrecks and destroyed vehicles and stuff added to the scenery, something to look at while your in GVs and Chutes. I cant imagine that it would cause any lag or take to much editing, they wouldnt move they would just be there. So you could drive across the country and see a nice B17 with pieces missing and scattered for a hundred yards and a trench when it crash landed, or a 109 with bullet holes and stuff. And on one of the maps there is an island a few sectors out, is there anything on those islands. and if not can we put something there like a city or grunt battles.

Pooface · « **Reply #1 on:** May 01, 2006, 10:00:30 AM »

can you say framerate whines?

Brenjen · « **Reply #2 on:** May 01, 2006, 11:00:03 AM »

It would be cool eye candy; it may hurt frame rates ( doubt it would hurt mine ). I would like to know from HTC if it would hurt the FPS that much or not...would it be more than the trees & bushes? Or the grass that's so tall a tank can't see over it? Or the huge ammount of barns ( are all the civilians in AH sheep herding barn builders? ) Or the little gray houses that you can't hide in or use as cover to fire from? ( I don't know about anyone else, but I can't shoot through the openings in the houses, my rounds blow up. I think the windows are too high or something - I don't know )

Bronk · « **Reply #3 on:** May 01, 2006, 11:09:21 AM »

That's the new and improved armored glass. According to Glasses the mustangs have been using it in AH for years.

Bronk

Pooface · « **Reply #4 on:** May 01, 2006, 11:11:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Bronk
That's the new and improved armored glass. According to Glasses the mustangs have been using it in AH for years.

Bronk

god that guy never gives up on the allied conspiracy theories:rolleyes:

Brenjen · « **Reply #5 on:** May 01, 2006, 11:21:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Bronk
That's the new and improved armored glass. According to Glasses the mustangs have been using it in AH for years.

Bronk

....heck it could be....I never thought of that

Hornet33 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 01, 2006, 02:35:31 PM »

It wouldn't change frame rates at all if you just replaced one of the 50 million barns we have with a plane every so often. I kinda like this idea.

Is that a real Tiger over there or is it Memorex?????

moneyguy · « **Reply #7 on:** May 01, 2006, 03:51:11 PM »

i like it

Austin · « **Reply #8 on:** May 01, 2006, 06:08:44 PM »

I like it

GlacierGirl · « **Reply #9 on:** May 01, 2006, 06:32:09 PM »

E25280 · « **Reply #10 on:** May 01, 2006, 08:26:45 PM »

I made a wish for vehicle wrecks not too long ago, and only got two replies from people who said their frame rates would suck because of it. . .

What is this, blatant sexism???

You bunch of whipped . . . I'm calling in the ACLU!!:mad:

On second thought . . . . Nnnno I won't.

GlacierGirl · « **Reply #11 on:** May 01, 2006, 09:02:24 PM »

What is this, blatant sexism???

I dont see how that has much to do with wreckage in the maps. Straying a little off topic.
Also No offence, and correct me if im wrong but is it that you think im getting more replies because my forum name is GlacierGirl. I am not a girl, the reason I have this forum name is because its the name of one of my all time favorite planes. Glacier Girl is a P38F that was brought up from 260 something feet of ice and restored to flying condition.

http://www.thelostsquadron.com/

SAS_KID · « **Reply #12 on:** May 01, 2006, 10:11:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GlacierGirl
What is this, blatant sexism???

I dont see how that has much to do with wreckage in the maps. Straying a little off topic.
Also No offence, and correct me if im wrong but is it that you think im getting more replies because my forum name is GlacierGirl. I am not a girl, the reason I have this forum name is because its the name of one of my all time favorite planes. Glacier Girl is a P38F that was brought up from 260 something feet of ice and restored to flying condition.

http://www.thelostsquadron.com/

O MAN YOUR NOT A GIRL O JEBUS:lol OMG WHERE ARE THE FLAMERS WHERE ARE THEY!

Well actually considering how many people die (or me getting cut off by a tree:rofl ) It would really hurt framerates to have to model every little piece then the fire from it man would kill in a furball. Can you imagine driving a T-34 over a junk pile of Spits an LA's would be fun but doubt some of these guyses Windows 1802's programs could handle it.

GlacierGirl · « **Reply #13 on:** May 02, 2006, 11:08:54 AM »

The number of wrecks would have nothing to do with the number of people getting shot down, Simply remove 50 or 60 barns in each sector and add like 3 or 4 downed planes. also just because there is a crash doesnt mean it will burn. So fire can be optional depending on HTs preferance.

68slayr · « **Reply #14 on:** May 02, 2006, 08:25:47 PM »

I like it. Don't see how it would hurt your frame rate. Its the same as a barn exept its a plane. (Doesn't move and a great place for gvs to hide next to)