Author Topic: The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread  (Read 2717 times)

Offline BGBMAW

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #105 on: May 20, 2006, 02:54:26 AM »
That statement is CRAP..


They will retaliate?..So..you think they are holding back now>?


My problem with this is..OIL..when or IF Iran gets waked..Oil is 6$ adn up....this is all bad


So you folks who say..they will revenge on us?..How?..with nukes already inside our Country..Hell no.....

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #106 on: May 20, 2006, 07:51:02 AM »
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2006, 09:11:37 AM by MP4 »

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #107 on: May 20, 2006, 07:54:41 AM »
IN

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #108 on: May 20, 2006, 09:32:10 AM »
hang... you need to move your people away from the blue areas..... no way to live anyway.

lazs

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #109 on: May 20, 2006, 10:24:45 AM »
Quote
They're sick of some hack racist pig ****ing retard from Alabama telling folks in the rest of America...


There is something fundamentally wrong with an attitude that would lead to the utterance of a remark filled with such prejudice.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #110 on: May 20, 2006, 12:01:58 PM »
We're just going to take a few on the chin and have to overcome that and move on.
====
someone send an aid car to toads place...he is obviously crying out for help on this :cry
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #111 on: May 20, 2006, 12:09:37 PM »
Why does Iran's leader say such utter rubbish & threats?

Cause the price of oil jumps each time and they earn billions $$ into the Islamic coffers.
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
INTERMISSION / POLL COUNT
« Reply #112 on: May 20, 2006, 12:36:30 PM »
As of this point, the overwhelming majority of posters have responded with a 'Nay'. Toad, I salute you, you are in fact correct in your pre-poll assesment that the exceeding majority of posters on this board would consider a first use of nukes to be an act of insanity.

I must admit that I don't share the majority opinion, but I do applaud the common sense and rational application of the western concept of 'fair play' with regards to the employment of the most fearsome weapons in our arsenal.

I hope that our reservations in this regard do not become the epitaph for NYC..   but resign myself to the hope that it never happens.. and that if it does we'll be ok and that those responsible will be eventually captured, tried and prosecuted.

To outside observers, and particularly our european friends... I hope that you are reassured that this nation is not, contrary to the common foriegn belief; populated by a pile of blood thirsty rednecks climbing over each other to be the first to push the big red button.

(myself excluded, of course. ;))

Lastly, for all of you that responded, seriously or tounge-in-cheek... thanks. Enjoyed wandering around in yer brains for a bit. Hope I didn't mess things up.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline ghi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #113 on: May 20, 2006, 12:42:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Nay.

Israel is not worth WWIII.


  I was thinking :

        -- Why not accept those 7 milion peoples from Israel to US and Canada, !!??
    --Why accept 12 milion mexicans ? they are not under death /nuke threats?!

 i don't think is going to be peace for them in middle east b4 Messiah comes

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #114 on: May 20, 2006, 12:53:06 PM »
I think the Iranian president has an account on this bsb.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #115 on: May 20, 2006, 12:55:08 PM »
hangtime, once a WMD attack on US soil has been realized, that majority you refer to will diappear in a flash, no pun intended.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #116 on: May 20, 2006, 01:05:03 PM »
I think that those with 'majority opinion' on this subject reside outside the target areas... and would not bemoan the loss too much of a few big blue cities.

I suspect they may not have considered the economic impact on the red states the loss of a big blue city like Manhattan would necessarily entail, but are willing to make the trade off just on principal.

Swap NYC for Washington DC when congress is in session and I'd probably join the majority with a wry smile.

;)
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #117 on: May 20, 2006, 01:39:14 PM »
The bad/sad thing is...we ARE going to have to take one (or more) on the chin. We have been free of the bombings since 9-11 here through tireless & extreme measures of security. Part of those extreme measures are in fact war & posturing for war against countries who support the people who want to kill us.

 With our style of life, we can't protect our country 100% without draconian measures being taken. I would say we are approaching that threshold but we aren't there yet. We are almost certainly going to be hit again inside our borders, you can bet on it, if we get a leader who is wishy-washy & weak on our security in the next presidential elections it'll just happen that much sooner.

 What are we to do? If we preemptivly (sp?) strike those who wish our destruction, we're monsters & if we wait until they kill several thousand or more of our citizenry, we're suckers & seen as weak thus inviting more attacks.

 We are on a path that takes us down a road without an end. If we kill a terrorist, we piss of his family & make more terrorsists. If we don't kill him we get hit. I mean really, what are we supposed to do? I am firmly against using nuclear weapons as a first strike option, it will turn the entire world against us & seeing as how we are nearly there now without using them because of the rest of the worlds jealousy of us, we can't afford to do it.

 The Chinese & Russians (& others including some fair weather friends) Have had a strategy on the books for decades about how to deal with the U.S.A.

 First they use E.M. pulse weapons which will incapacitate us almost completely & we will not know who delivered the weapon for quite some time. While we are scrambling to fix the vital war/defense mechanisms they hit us with several neutron bombs. The idea is to break the will of the population of the U.S. (which the world views as weak) to fight & lose large numbers Americans doing so. When we roll over & pee on ourselves, they dictate terms.

 The American experts in the E.M. weapon field say we would be mostly incapacitated for 6 to 8 weeks. The Russian & Chinese experts say 6 to 12 months. Either way they have plenty of time to do whatever they want to do & superior numbers also. Another thing in their favor is, if we retaliate in a like manner, they will not lose their ability to make war & feed themselves on the same scale as we will.

 The main obstacle to that plan is the massive number of armed citizens in the U.S. & they know they would have to come & get us, or wait for the population to begin to suffer massive losses due to starvation & disease & by that time the govt. would have her war fighting capabilities back.

 Oh what a tangled web we weave. First strike nuclear weapons? Nope. Sit around on our hands & wait for someone to kick us in the nuts? Nope.

 Just what are we supposed to do? Surrender so no one gets hurt but us?

 Nope.

 it's too bad we can't solve the worlds problems from the AH bbs. Hey that's an idea, make the worlds leaders settle their differences in the D.A. LOL

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #118 on: May 20, 2006, 02:18:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
I think that those with 'majority opinion' on this subject reside outside the target areas... and would not bemoan the loss too much of a few big blue cities.

I suspect they may not have considered the economic impact on the red states the loss of a big blue city like Manhattan would necessarily entail, but are willing to make the trade off just on principal.

Swap NYC for Washington DC when congress is in session and I'd probably join the majority with a wry smile.

;)


Blue cities or D.C.? Probably not much love lost but it would sure give us an excuse to go all indignant on the tulips of those even remotely tied to terrorism. I have to disagree with Toad on this. Nuke one of our cities and we'll find someone responsible.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #119 on: May 20, 2006, 02:40:12 PM »
I feel so much better knowing we will be avenged.

:rolleyes:

BTW, not all of us here in, around and near the fallout shadow of the big blue cities are whiney liberal puzzies.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.