Author Topic: The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread  (Read 3029 times)

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #135 on: May 21, 2006, 01:03:41 AM »
I think I've seen this type of thread about 13,489 times give or take a dozen since the intardnet was invented by Gore. Still stupid.

Nuke this thread. Nooooooke it. Nookelar. :aok

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #136 on: May 21, 2006, 09:35:59 AM »
hang... yep.. the loss of some blue cities wouldn't be that bad.. I think I could live with the economic problems so long as the blue guys had more to worry about than what I may be doing or what the defenition of athiest is or if I should have a 10 round or 30 round mag for my guns.  

Or if I am wearing a seatbelt or helmet or going too fast...

lazs
« Last Edit: May 21, 2006, 09:38:08 AM by lazs2 »

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #137 on: May 21, 2006, 10:18:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Actually, I'm afraid we'll just find someone, whether they are responsible or not.

Not quite the same thing, is it.


Plenty of responsibility to go around. That we destroy those that actually triggered the nuke isn't quite as important as making an unforgetttable example of those who nutured the climate that encouraged them.

I know how this sounds but I think it might be a fair trade to suffer the loss of one of our cities if we can in return put a permanent end to the fanatacism that led to it. By permanent I mean a hundred years or more.

Of course we need to be reasonably sure as to from where the attack came. Proof isn't necessary.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #138 on: May 21, 2006, 12:15:21 PM »
toad, think NEUTRON BOMB :D

solves the long term radiation problem.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #139 on: May 21, 2006, 12:42:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lukster
Plenty of responsibility to go around. That we destroy those that actually triggered the nuke isn't quite as important as making an unforgetttable example of those who nutured the climate that encouraged them.
 


That would be an excellant start.  And hopefully enought of a point made to be the end of it.
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #140 on: May 21, 2006, 02:18:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lukster
Plenty of responsibility to go around. That we destroy those that actually triggered the nuke isn't quite as important as making an unforgetttable example of those who nutured the climate that encouraged them.



You mean Regan, Bush Sr. (as head of the CIA) et al?

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #141 on: May 21, 2006, 02:23:49 PM »
beg pardon... but doesn't an airliner chucked into buildings filled with people make the 'weapon of mass destruction' list? Coulda swore I saw that on the list of charges against mussoui?

...and, since we've been attacked with a 'weapon of mass destruction' 4 times already..

*sigh*

How many more we gonna take on the chin?

Just like santa, doesn't washington have a list, checked twice, of the countries both naughty & nice? Coulda swore we're in a 'war on terror'...

And we're waiting for what to happen, again?

Oh, that's right.. attacking states that are terrorist sponsors would be bad for 'business'.

Silly me.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline AlGorithm

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 117
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #142 on: May 21, 2006, 06:07:48 PM »
Quote
Hangtime wrote:Oh, that's right.. attacking states that are terrorist sponsors would be bad for 'business'.

And cousin Bandar would put away the checkbook.

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #143 on: May 21, 2006, 06:44:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
beg pardon... but doesn't an airliner chucked into buildings filled with people make the 'weapon of mass destruction' list?


No, there is an accepted definition of what constitutes a WMD and an airliner chucked into buildings filled with people doesn't make list...unless they contain nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons that is.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #144 on: May 21, 2006, 07:31:36 PM »
The Federal Government of the United States of America disagrees. Charge 4 against Mussoui:

Section 2332a. Use of certain weapons of mass destruction

      (a) Offense Against a National of the United States or
    Within the United States. - A person who, without lawful
    authority, uses, threatens, or attempts or conspires to use, a weapon of    mass destruction [From the indictment: “namely, airplanes intended for use
    as missiles, bombs, and similar devices”.] (other than a
    chemical weapon as that term is defined
    in section 229F), including any biological agent, toxin, or vector
    (as those terms are defined in section 178) -
        (1) against a national of the United States while such national
      is outside of the United States;
        (2) against any person within the United States, and the
      results of such use affect interstate or foreign commerce or, in
      the case of a threat, attempt, or conspiracy, would have affected
      interstate or foreign commerce; or
        (3) against any property that is owned, leased or used by the
      United States or by any department or agency of the United
      States, whether the property is within or outside of the United
      States, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, and if
      death results, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of
     years or for life.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #145 on: May 21, 2006, 08:12:19 PM »
Point of order.

Redefinition of WMDs for a terrorist conviction sounds challengable if the definition cannot be applied universally. For instance, sanctioning a country for it's illegal ownership of WMDs known as airplanes.

Just sayin'.

Invade all non-western non-Christian countries that own airplanes.

*ShruG*

Having said that, yes .... terrorists used airliners to cause mass destruction on September 11, 2001 in the United States. They used a truck to cause mass destruction to a barracks in Beruit before then but I didn't see a case put together redefining trucks as WMDs.

Offline moneyguy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 933
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #146 on: May 21, 2006, 10:02:31 PM »
you people watch too much TV  :noid

Offline Hap

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3908
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #147 on: May 21, 2006, 10:42:42 PM »
:aok you nailed it moneyguy.

hap

Offline Edbert1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1539
      • http://www.edbert.net
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #148 on: May 22, 2006, 07:31:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AlGorithm
So as long as we can't tell it's an Israeli nuke....

Those heartless bastiges have the gall to hit us themselves if they thought we'd wipe out  Damascus/Tehran/Riyadh/Muscat/Beirut/Abu Dhabi/Mecca for them in retailation.

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread
« Reply #149 on: May 22, 2006, 08:37:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert1
Those heartless bastiges have the gall to hit us themselves if they thought we'd wipe out  Damascus/Tehran/Riyadh/Muscat/Beirut/Abu Dhabi/Mecca for them in retailation.



:noid :noid :noid
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe