Author Topic: The 'would you use a nuke' vote thread (Read 2710 times)

moot · « **Reply #30 on:** May 18, 2006, 05:17:34 AM »

As a last resort.

Heater · « **Reply #31 on:** May 18, 2006, 05:19:18 AM »

Let them glow!

eagl · « **Reply #32 on:** May 18, 2006, 05:21:15 AM »

Please don't nuke Korea... Except for some people up in the North, it's really a nice country.

~Caligula~ · « **Reply #33 on:** May 18, 2006, 06:05:26 AM »

To nuke a nuclear facility and ruin the country for 50 000 years at least...just sounds a bit of an overkill..
something has to be done...but not that.

Saintaw · « **Reply #34 on:** May 18, 2006, 06:32:35 AM »

No thanks.

NattyIced · « **Reply #35 on:** May 18, 2006, 06:57:27 AM »

Nuke all terrorists. Start in DC.

Hap · « **Reply #36 on:** May 18, 2006, 06:59:55 AM »

No.

~~hap~~

FiLtH · « **Reply #37 on:** May 18, 2006, 08:32:25 AM »

Pei hold on here...there IS a substantial dollar figure we are talking about here. I don't think a corporal has the authority to make such a decision...no offense.

lazs2 · « **Reply #38 on:** May 18, 2006, 08:40:33 AM »

I do not believe that the muslim religion will ever tolerate any other belief.

I believe that they will kill or enslave anyone they get a chance to who will not convert.

I also believe we can wage conventional war and win but will not rule out nukes.

If a muslim terrorist get's a nuke to the U.S. the worst that can happen is a few hundred thousand less blue state voters... they won't waste a nuke on the red areas. they will go for the socialist sardine people first.

lazs

john9001 · « **Reply #39 on:** May 18, 2006, 08:47:10 AM »

this is really funny, i think i see some people who are against fighting in iraq wanting to nuke iran.

war is serious business, not to be taken lightly or to be entered into on a whim.

no nukes.

NattyIced · « **Reply #40 on:** May 18, 2006, 08:57:15 AM »

Nuke the whales!

Cthen · « **Reply #41 on:** May 18, 2006, 10:40:03 AM »

I would advocate EMP ..... High Altitude Nuclear Detonation ......

Little Radiation if any .....
No Deaths
Not 1 single working car/computer/radio/tv ....Nuclear Facility...............PRICEL ESS

On a side note,

*Hamas (Palestine aka....terrorist central) is FUNDED by Iran
*Hamas has vowed to destroy Israel
*Syria provides shelter and comfort to enemies of America
*Syria is an insurgent "safe house"
*United States has vowed attacks on Israel are the same as attacks on our soil

For a moment, stop and look at a current world map of the middle east. Israel needs space/depth for protection and security. America has known for years that Iran is a MAJOR problem when concerning Israel's security and lets not forget our honey hole (Oil Fields) that America NEEDS to survive as we currently exist.

Now we have what appears to be a battle map with a classic "pincer" set-up (Iraq ... Iran ...Afganistan) with troops and large bases in place. Bye Bye Iran when the time comes, and we know it wont be long (Bush has less than 2 years left). You could NOT ask for a better pre attack position for Iran than what we currently have. Four (4) port countries Turkey, Israel, Iraq, Afganistan. Three (3) seas to operate carriers from, if Israel can take on Syria while we work the "front line" of Iraq/Iran then Iran becomes yet another solidified base of operation to prevent China from exploiting ie... taking (our oil).

I wont even go into a full discussion of what I think about Saudi Arabia and what their role is here, but to say I think they are the puppet masters of everything going on today concerning oil prices/terrorism/military strategery.

Control of oil is the prize, keeping Israel safe is the "feel good factor" for the masses. This also continues the "War on Terror" because we KNOW people will be pissed off and want to fight which provides economic growth to defense contractors and gun makers. Remember, George Washington (First President of the US) was considered a terrorist by Britian during our revolutionary times. History WILL be written by the victorius.

What I am trying to get at is this, RESOURCES on a overly populated planet MUST be competed for (ie...war). We are already being told China's need for oil will outstrip current supplies in 20 years. Do you want to win or loss????

Maybe all this is just rambling thoughts of a paraniod person or maybe I will be on the cover of "This Week in Prophecy" LOL

I truly HOPE I am wrong on all of this, if I'm not wrong I want to WIN!

GtoRA2 · « **Reply #42 on:** May 18, 2006, 10:57:44 AM »

I have a plan, we all get rid of our nukes.

Here is how.

The US does a covert strike, we take out France, China, the UK, the ruskies, the indians, Pakistan, and any other nuke nation, and then we nuke Saudia arabia, Iran, syria, lebinon, etc.

Once we have used them all up to take out the rest, things will be great!

No Nukes, No nukes! (after we use them!)

Edbert1 · « **Reply #43 on:** May 18, 2006, 11:50:13 AM »

n000ks? Nay.

As much conventional expletives as necessary to wipe Militan Islam off the planet regardless of the collateral damage. Aye.

Trying to play nicey-nice and avoid collateral damage to the point of missing the actual target itself. Nay.

Sending our lads out to patrol enemy territory and act as bait while trying to win over hearts-and-minds with Hershey bars? Nay

Timofei · « **Reply #44 on:** May 18, 2006, 12:03:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Edbert1
As much conventional expletives as necessary to wipe Militan Islam off the planet regardless of the collateral damage.

So brave behind the keyboard, aren't you. "Collateral damage"=Killing civilians. But easy the say behind the anonymity of the internet. Tard.