Author Topic: Child molester "too short" for prison (Read 1751 times)

StarOfAfrica2 · « **on:** May 25, 2006, 04:14:04 PM »

This is a crock. They'll be lucky if they dont find this guy strung up in his backyard someday soon.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12969163/?GT1=8199

Quote

SIDNEY, Neb. - A judge said a 5-foot-1 man convicted of sexually assaulting a child was too small to survive in prison, and gave him 10 years of probation instead.

His crimes deserved a long sentence, District Judge Kristine Cecava said, but she worried that Richard W. Thompson, 50, would be especially imperiled by prison dangers.

Wolfala · « **Reply #1 on:** May 25, 2006, 04:16:22 PM »

Too pretty for prision. Too short for prision. Does he have anything else to complain about before he gets his mouth stuffed full of coc?

Gunslinger · « **Reply #2 on:** May 25, 2006, 04:30:15 PM »

"your honor, my anus is too small for prison"

Rino · « **Reply #3 on:** May 25, 2006, 05:23:35 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
"your honor, my anus is too small for prison"

Not anymore

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #4 on:** May 25, 2006, 05:25:06 PM »

What a shame.
He deserved to be gang banged.

midnight Target · « **Reply #5 on:** May 25, 2006, 05:25:12 PM »

More nonsense from those libruls in Nebraska.

Debonair · « **Reply #6 on:** May 25, 2006, 06:57:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
"your honor, my anus is too small for prison"

LOLOLOLOLOOLLLOLOLLOOLLOLLLOO LOOLLOLOOLOLOLLOOLLOOLOLLLO
that was funny, thanks.

*
*
*
*

SOB · « **Reply #7 on:** May 25, 2006, 07:22:30 PM »

They should have had mercy on him, and taken him behind the courthouse for a quick and orderly hanging.

Shuckins · « **Reply #8 on:** May 25, 2006, 07:34:04 PM »

By the time those cons got through with him, he'd have been taller.

Sixpence · « **Reply #9 on:** May 25, 2006, 09:50:27 PM »

Get behind on your child support, go to jail. Molest children, register on a database, walk around free.

I would rather have a car theif on the streets than a child molester

StarOfAfrica2 · « **Reply #10 on:** May 26, 2006, 02:39:19 AM »

Yeah at least if the car theif steals your car, insurance pays for it and no big loss. Just headache.

Child molesters steal something you cant put back or fix.

jab116 · « **Reply #11 on:** May 26, 2006, 03:25:15 AM »

No soap on a rope for him, he don't need it.
Handles on the back of his head & lots of chapstick is what he needs, & deserves.

Angus · « **Reply #12 on:** May 26, 2006, 04:24:21 AM »

Maybe use this 18th century tool?
http://www.ingenious.org.uk/media/4.0_SAC/webimages/1028/7/10287452_3.jpg

Goomba · « **Reply #13 on:** May 26, 2006, 01:35:41 PM »

Maybe it's my old school Sicilian blood but I see a positive in this outlandish, monumentally stoopid judgement.

Since he's not in the slam, the child's family can find him, and "reach out and touch him", as it were.

In my neighborhood, that means he'd probably suffer a tragic "fall", or "trip" in front of a bus.

Terrible shame. Really.

Hangtime · « **Reply #14 on:** May 26, 2006, 01:55:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Goomba
Maybe it's my old school Sicilian blood but I see a positive in this outlandish, monumentally stoopid judgement.

Since he's not in the slam, the child's family can find him, and "reach out and touch him", as it were.

In my neighborhood, that means he'd probably suffer a tragic "fall", or "trip" in front of a bus.

Terrible shame. Really.

There would be no child molestation problem if the first thing done to the accused was to cut the guys donut and balls off with a dull knife.

If he's aquitted, they can let him have 'em back in a jar.