Author Topic: Last night on the history channel  (Read 2080 times)

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #75 on: June 06, 2006, 12:40:43 AM »
Paper wipes poo. Scissors cut paper. :D

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #76 on: June 06, 2006, 12:51:41 AM »
Yes, but who cut the cheese?
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #77 on: June 06, 2006, 12:54:27 AM »
Frenchie. :D

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #78 on: June 06, 2006, 05:14:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pooh21
Send me 29.95 and I will send you a certificate certifying your awesome ninja skills, suitable for framing


Act Fast this is a limited time offer



Sweet!!!:aok

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #79 on: June 06, 2006, 08:16:13 AM »
"Just like any numbnut can watch the History Channel and espouse it's validity."

lol.  Bullseye.

Anyone who treats the History Channel "doctoredmentaries" as hardcore research is truly a numbnut.   Thier "what if" and "exposed after 50 years!" type of productions are simply "inuendo sprinkled with fact" entertainment.


 lol.  "It must be true! I saw in on the History channel..."

Too much.

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #80 on: June 06, 2006, 08:36:09 AM »
Crap I always miss the good ones. Everytime I turn on the History Channel it's a sleeper like The History of ball bearings.:(

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #81 on: June 06, 2006, 09:57:37 AM »
i thought " history of ball bearings" was very interesting, can't wait for the sequel.

Offline Edbert1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1539
      • http://www.edbert.net
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #82 on: June 06, 2006, 11:05:49 AM »
So, does this mean that the Japs did not have bombers that could launch from a sub and take out the Panama canal?

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #83 on: June 06, 2006, 12:45:02 PM »
Quote
So, does this mean that the Japs did not have bombers that could launch from a sub and take out the Panama canal?




 To some it does, of course. It was documented & people who saw it were interviewed, how much more made up can you get :p

 What I really like about this is not one of the people who have flamed in this thread have brought out a counter to the authenticated documents that were discovered & the first hand interviews with two of the scientists who worked on the project.
 
 The allies captured the German documents & the German scientists. Yet most of the flamers here apparently believe those interviews & documents that claim the scientists steered the German atomic projects in the wrong direction; but refuse to believe the documentation & interviews of the Japanese. I think conspiracy nuts like that should be hunted down & medicated by force, they are a danger to themselves, they're gonna be running around with tin-foil hats on shortly. These are the same people who think the Pentagon was hit by a missle or something, come on.

 I was hoping for an actual intelligent discussion, I found that intelligence is no more common here than on the Yahoo forums lol....just a bunch of immature trolls.

 I missed the show on the ball bearings, I would have liked to have seen it. It's the little things that make the world go that get overlooked a lot of times.

Offline AlGorithm

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 117
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #84 on: June 06, 2006, 01:00:19 PM »
Last night on The History Channel...

Quote

Welcome to the remote, top-secret military base Kapustin Yar, which is alleged to have housed the wreckage and remains of no fewer than eight UFO crash incidents between 1945 and '91. Interviews, on-camera tours, dramatic reenactments, and extensive recreations reveal this extraordinary facility, showing the ways in which Soviet UFO research scientists used and processed the wreckage... and the alien bodies.


http://store.aetv.com/html/product/index.jhtml?id=74548

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #85 on: June 06, 2006, 01:18:22 PM »
LOL what does that have to do with anything?

 I never said the History channel didn't run shows for entertainment purposes. You have to speak english to understand when something is being put forth as fact or alleged as fact. The History channel is very careful to use the correct english terms in these cases from what I have seen.


 Look at this snip "which is alleged ";  they didn't say authenticated. It's little differences like that you must understand. By using your snip as a point then we must assume you believe the U.S. govt's own U.F.O. research makes their aeronautical accomplishments bunk? There aren't really B-2 bombers or F-14's or F-22's or the space shuttle are there? Because they investigated U.F.O.'s too right?



Ask yourselves this;

 The Russians built a bomb very quickly after the end of WWII, how do you suppose they obtained this technology if it was impossible for anyone but the incredible United States to figure out? The Russians were about as technologically backwards as a society could be when the war started.

 How about those dirt farming Chinese who can't even design a plane without help, how did they do it?

 I suppose the fact that GERMAN scientists here in the U.S. were responsible for the creation of the U.S. bomb goes overlooked by the masses as well.

 All these backwards countries just skipped the atomic weapons like we tested at the Trinity site & jumped straight into thermonuclear devices & neutron bombs I suppose.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #86 on: June 06, 2006, 01:26:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Brenjen
LOL what does that have to do with anything?

 I never said the History channel didn't run shows for entertainment purposes. You have to speak english to understand when something is being put forth as fact or alleged as fact. The History channel is very careful to use the correct english terms in these cases from what I have seen.


 Look at this snip "which is alleged ";  they didn't say authenticated. It's little differences like that you must understand. By using your snip as a point then we must assume you believe the U.S. govt's own U.F.O. research makes their aeronautical accomplishments bunk? There aren't really B-2 bombers or F-14's or F-22's or the space shuttle are there? Because they investigated U.F.O.'s too right?



Ask yourselves this;

 The Russians built a bomb very quickly after the end of WWII, how do you suppose they obtained this technology if it was impossible for anyone but the incredible United States to figure out? The Russians were about as technologically backwards as a society could be when the war started.

 How about those dirt farming Chinese who can't even design a plane without help, how did they do it?

 I suppose the fact that GERMAN scientists here in the U.S. were responsible for the creation of the U.S. bomb goes overlooked by the masses as well.

 All these backwards countries just skipped the atomic weapons like we tested at the Trinity site & jumped straight into thermonuclear devices & neutron bombs I suppose.


First rule of hole digging: when yer in over yer head, stop digging.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline AlGorithm

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 117
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #87 on: June 06, 2006, 01:39:28 PM »
Quote
Brenjen wrote;
Ask yourselves this;

The Russians built a bomb very quickly after the end of WWII, how do you suppose they obtained this technology if it was impossible for anyone but the incredible United States to figure out? The Russians were about as technologically backwards as a society could be when the war started.

How about those dirt farming Chinese who can't even design a plane without help, how did they do it?

I suppose the fact that GERMAN scientists here in the U.S. were responsible for the creation of the U.S. bomb goes overlooked by the masses as well.

All these backwards countries just skipped the atomic weapons like we tested at the Trinity site & jumped straight into thermonuclear devices & neutron bombs I suppose.



Alien UFOs?







j/k ;)

Our ever truthful government blamed it on a communist/jewish conspiracy. Rosenbergs -> Russia -> China.

Or did the feds abuse the death penalty and execute innocent people?

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #88 on: June 06, 2006, 01:39:35 PM »
So why dont you guys stop digging? Trying to find that counterpoint I asked for?

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Last night on the history channel
« Reply #89 on: June 06, 2006, 01:44:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Brenjen

 

Ask yourselves this;

 The Russians built a bomb very quickly after the end of WWII, how do you suppose they obtained this technology if it was impossible for anyone but the incredible United States to figure out? The Russians were about as technologically backwards as a society could be when the war started.

 


we already know the answer, well some of us anyway.

some English nuke engineer who thought the world would be safer if USSR and the USA had the bomb gave USSR the technical theory for it and the rosenbergs gave the Russians the mechanical info.*

* rosenbergs brother-in-law worked at los alamos.

the USSR has always had and still does have spies and sympathisers in the USA.