Author Topic: Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore  (Read 4890 times)

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #210 on: June 28, 2006, 12:21:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
allways cracks me up when people place so much faith in the theories of scientists even when allmost every long range theory/prediction they have ever agreed on turned out to be false or mostly so.

They seem to be very narrowly focused group of people who can't adapt rapidly to new information or even a lot of information when it comes to making long range predictions.

Sci fi writers have a better record for predicting the future.

lazs


I don't think sci-fi writers so much predict the fututre as they do shape it. Didn't one of the greatest scientists of all time say "imagination is more important than knowledge"? Of course you might argue then that these Global Warming Alarmists are being pretty important.  ;)

Offline Dos Equis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #211 on: June 28, 2006, 12:33:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
allways cracks me up when people place so much faith in the theories of scientists even when allmost every long range theory/prediction they have ever agreed on turned out to be false or mostly so.

lazs


Damn 'dem scientists. All that Jonas Salk and polio nonsense. Coulda 'bin cured with some gool ol fashion tonic I tell ya!

And 'dat Copernicus. Damn him, if it wasnt for him, we'd have the sun rotatin' 'round us! Like it should be!

Offline weaselsan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1147
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #212 on: June 28, 2006, 01:02:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shuckins
Yeager,

In response to your question "How many scientists does it take to change a lightbulb?" I would submit the following reply:

They would probably never actually get around to screwing a new bulb in.  

The group of scientists would first have to study the phenomenon of the light bulb, formuate a hypothesis of why or how it works, study similar phenomena in other environments, test their hypothesis on both a random and a control group, observe the results, draw conclusions from their results, publish a paper and then submit said paper to a peer review board, conduct a series of lectures in various countries to win support for their study and its conclusions, and finally, start a new study to determine what impact said lightbulb would have upon the environment.

Lastly, they would probably, ultimately conclude that the lightbulb was NOT a result of "intelligent design."

Regards, Shuckins


But you missed the real purpose of their scientific inquiry....they would all apply for a grant of 106.8 million dollars to better understand how the lightbulb may be contributing to climate change.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18820
another take on the goron doomsday flick
« Reply #213 on: June 28, 2006, 01:52:36 PM »
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #214 on: June 28, 2006, 01:55:24 PM »
IN
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #215 on: June 28, 2006, 02:02:55 PM »
What do you call a guy named Gore from Texas?

GORETEX

get it?
====
sKUzzY is teh Threadinator!
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #216 on: June 28, 2006, 02:03:44 PM »
:rolleyes:
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #217 on: June 28, 2006, 02:06:24 PM »
How could you possibly think gore is biased in science. Nuts, gore INVENTED science!!!



































 Oh and IN  :p
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Dos Equis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #218 on: June 28, 2006, 02:24:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by weaselsan
But you missed the real purpose of their scientific inquiry....they would all apply for a grant of 106.8 million dollars to better understand how the lightbulb may be contributing to climate change.


But the Republicans would have given all the money away already in a one time "enterprise zone" tax break to a corporation that contributed to their campaign. And the money would have gone to its rightful place - as bonuses to the executive board and to raise the dividend by a penny.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
sand

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #220 on: June 28, 2006, 02:38:45 PM »
See Rule #4

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #221 on: June 28, 2006, 02:45:58 PM »
dos ekk.. I see that you have trouble following....  

We are not talking about polio vacines here.  We are talking about predicting the future.  Scientists have a very poor record of that.  Even something as simple as a polio vacine... they would have a much better chance of inventing it than of predicting when it would happen or.... even if.  

You seem to be saying tho that if they are smart enough to cure polio then they most certainly can predict and understand global climate.

You might just as well as said that since they can't even cure the common cold... they have little chance of predicting the weather for next week.

lazs

Offline Dos Equis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #222 on: June 28, 2006, 03:09:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
dos ekk.. I see that you have trouble following....  

lazs


Following your logic? I think most people do...

You think science and the scientific method are things to be scorned. I really don't think there is any point continuing then...

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #223 on: June 28, 2006, 03:14:44 PM »
How could anyone possibly question the rock solid facts and statements made by global warming scientists?
Such as ...."Maybe/maybe not".."Could be/could not be"......"Possibly/possibly not".........."IF"..and my all time favorite....."I have a gut feeling".
So where is the confusion?


:D
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Response to Al "Chicken Little" Gore
« Reply #224 on: June 28, 2006, 03:17:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
gore INVENTED science!!!


Wrong! Gore invented Kurt Tank then went on to invent the internet.


Oh......and the pay phone. Nearly forgot that one.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2006, 03:20:14 PM by Jackal1 »
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------