Originally posted by rpm
Gerrymandering in any way, shape or form is bad. Why cant they just give 4 county districts and be done with it?
Instead we get insane districts like these:
I agree its BS, but its long establised BS. The fact that it has been done this way for decades dosn't make it any more apealing.
Back to your statement "The SCOTUS has become a Republican tool."
December 5, 1995, Argued
June 13, 1996, Decided
DECISION: Each of three congressional districts established, under Texas legislature's redistricting plan, with African-American or Hispanic majority held to violate Federal Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment as racial gerrymander.
STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and BREYER, JJ., joined, post, p. 1003. SOUTER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and BREYER, JJ., joined, post, p. 1045. ----------2006-----------------------------------------------------
Liberal Justices John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer voted to strike down the entire plan. Stevens said it cannot survive constitutional scrutiny because the sole motivation was a desire to minimize the strength of Texas Democrats.In 1996 they (Stevens and Breyer) held one opinion, in 2006 they flipped. On the other side of that coin the conservative side did the same thing, before it was bad, now its fine.
Gerymandering in some form or fashion is not going away.
welcome to the 1960's