Author Topic: Should of just killed him.  (Read 1429 times)

Offline dmf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2920
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #30 on: July 02, 2006, 11:01:42 PM »
Oh trust me by no means did I mean it'd take him 5 minutes or 10 seconds to die, the 10 seconds is just the amount of time it'd take me to make sure he died a very slow painfull days on end death.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #31 on: July 03, 2006, 12:34:28 AM »
I'd just shoot him in the head twice.

Of course, I am not a loving mother or father.

Two bullets to the head takes care of the objective - his death. The purpose is not my emotional gratification through the causing of excruciating pain using torture. The purpose is not to turn me into a sadist who takes joy from the screaming of humans.

But loving moms and dads are different. I'm sure they'll be better moms and dads after a few sadistic misdeeds. Hell; let the kids watch, that'll teach them not to misbehave!

Offline B@tfinkV

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5751
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #32 on: July 03, 2006, 12:53:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by eagl
Actually batfink, in some muslim communities the female rape victim is killed because of the shame she's caused her family.

No joke.  Time magazine ran a big story about these so-called "honor killings" in Turkey and other muslim countries.  Apparently some of the governments are trying to put a stop to the practice but the religious leaders are actively promoting the practice to make it clear that sharia law has precedence over secular government laws and regulations.


very good point, i remember reading a story of a young girl of 17 or so, excecuted as a punishment for being raped.


the story where the two boyfriends ran away on mopeds and left the girls to be raped.



I have, however, also seen many stories, and a few shocking internet videos of men having thier bits cut off for rape.


as you say, it depends on who has the most influence in the region, the government or priests.....
 400 yrds on my tail, right where i want you... [/size]

Offline B@tfinkV

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5751
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #33 on: July 03, 2006, 01:45:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
you ALWAYS pay the price of your actions ... karma sees to that

 




so very very true.



I once lied to a girlfriend, blatant and to her face. i was young and foolish. she was no angel either.



anyhow, the relationship went on for months after, but i could never be truly happy in the relationship or in everyday life because of that lie.


Karma wouldnt let me get away with it even though no one else could ever prove me wrong.


one day, i told her the truth. Instantly i felt the lie lifted from my shoulders.  she did dump me though... :D




there is no heaven or hell.


life on earth slowly become one or the other due to karma, in most cases.
 400 yrds on my tail, right where i want you... [/size]

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #34 on: July 03, 2006, 11:00:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by StSanta
I'd just shoot him in the head twice.

Of course, I am not a loving mother or father.

Two bullets to the head takes care of the objective - his death. The purpose is not my emotional gratification through the causing of excruciating pain using torture. The purpose is not to turn me into a sadist who takes joy from the screaming of humans.

But loving moms and dads are different. I'm sure they'll be better moms and dads after a few sadistic misdeeds. Hell; let the kids watch, that'll teach them not to misbehave!


 Well in a way you're right, it would be more gratifiying for a mother or father in some cases, especilly ones who had lost a child. But not even all of them would want that punishment for the offenders. In my mind it's more about deterent, if intelligent animals see no "punishment" for their actions, they will not see their actions as having such a steep price for them to pay if confronted.

 A lot of these murdering & raping animals in our society think they will get off or at the very least get pity from the courts & only be sentenced to life in prison (which sometimes isn't even life, but only 30 years until parole is possible) & the ones who are sentenced to death die in seclusion & the reports are "the criminal went peacefully"

 My plan is for the would be criminals to see the horror of being skinned alive, rolled in fiberglass insulation & dumped into a pool of strong salt water; taken out & tied down while the executioner crushes their teeth with pliers one by one & continuing in that fashion until the offender expires.

 That way the offender gets his (or hers) & the would be offenders have a penalty to think about that they have seen with their own eyes is no easy or "peaceful" death. Did Samantha Runion die easy? How about Carly Brucia? We know Jessica Lunsford didn't, unless a prepubescent body being forcefully penetrated vaginally & anally for hours & hours wasn't bad enough...he buries her alive? WTF sort of humane treatment do they deserve?
 
 It's like the mountain lion problem, when they stop being killed by humans, they lose their fear of us & begin to view us as prey. We should re-instill fear into those murdering rapists minds. I.M.O. of course. As far as who would stoop down to their level to send them on that journey? I would, I volunteer to torture anyone like that John Couey or however you spell it, if they admit guilt, I have no problem with it at all, man or woman...Susan Smith....Andrea Yates....no problem.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #35 on: July 03, 2006, 11:03:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Brenjen

 My plan is for the would be criminals to see the horror of being skinned alive, rolled in fiberglass insulation & dumped into a pool of strong salt water; taken out & tied down while the executioner crushes their teeth with pliers one by one & continuing in that fashion until the offender expires.


One major flaw in your plan. What sort of people do you think could perform this execution? Will you be content with this type of monster roaming free in your streets?
sand

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5708
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #36 on: July 03, 2006, 11:07:39 AM »
Are you advocating murder then Parker?
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline dmf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2920
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #37 on: July 03, 2006, 02:29:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by StSanta
I'd just shoot him in the head twice.

Of course, I am not a loving mother or father.

Two bullets to the head takes care of the objective - his death. The purpose is not my emotional gratification through the causing of excruciating pain using torture. The purpose is not to turn me into a sadist who takes joy from the screaming of humans.

But loving moms and dads are different. I'm sure they'll be better moms and dads after a few sadistic misdeeds. Hell; let the kids watch, that'll teach them not to misbehave!


It only takes 10 seconds to pour clorox down his throat. Thats how sadistic I could be to a child molester/killer

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #38 on: July 03, 2006, 02:50:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
One major flaw in your plan. What sort of people do you think could perform this execution? Will you be content with this type of monster roaming free in your streets?


 Me, that's who...I volunteer at the end of that rant, you must've missed it.:aok

 Content? Yes, very. The entire time I was ending thier miserable existence.

 In my mind I would see the smiling faces of the ones saved by such a public display of absolute violence, I would envision that little Samantha Runion girls face on a happy living child, instead of rotting in the ground after a horrible rape & murder, back playing & smiling & enjoying a life ripped from her...in the form of a child saved.

 Like I said, I would view it as worth the public scorn for slowly torturing hundreds of admitted murderers to death even if it only saved one innocent life.

 You might see me smiling while ripping off chunks of their flesh & think "what an evil dude" & the whole time in my mind I'm seeing a little three year old bright eyed baby playing in the sun,growing into a woman & having a family of her own.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #39 on: July 03, 2006, 04:14:48 PM »
Well... if you're capable of such things, I don't want you on the streets either.
sand

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #40 on: July 03, 2006, 04:49:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by dmf
It only takes 10 seconds to pour clorox down his throat. Thats how sadistic I could be to a child molester/killer


While you're at it...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/07/03/iraq.charge/index.html

let him be next in line.

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #41 on: July 03, 2006, 06:41:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Well... if you're capable of such things, I don't want you on the streets either.


 Many people agree with you.

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10229
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #42 on: July 03, 2006, 07:08:58 PM »
hard to say what punishment is good enough for a peice of **** like that. Death is far too easy, and prison costs too much. But they have fun with rapists in prison.
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline dmf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2920
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #43 on: July 03, 2006, 10:27:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Red Tail 444
While you're at it...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/07/03/iraq.charge/index.html

let him be next in line.


I heard about that briefly on the news, I have no desire to kill him, I have a better idea, since everybody that comes to the US is subject to us law, let him be subject to the law of where he is. I hear that in muslim countries they cut off a hand for stealing, Lets see what they'll cut off of him for rape and murder. If he's found guilty.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
Should of just killed him.
« Reply #44 on: July 03, 2006, 11:17:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by dmf
It only takes 10 seconds to pour clorox down his throat. Thats how sadistic I could be to a child molester/killer


Just f****n shoot the guy. What's with the torture thing? Clorox treatment? I understand you want to protect your young and I understand the basic premise that mothers protecting their young will go to great lengths to do so. Is he any deader if you use Clorox instead of a double tap to the head? Is he less of a threat then?

As far as deterrent - if death is not a deterrent, torture ain't gonna be either. Most of these crimes are done outta a sick twisted overwhelming sexual desire. There's nothing rational about it. It won't work.

If we don't want to be so soft and don't mind an innocent getting whacked by the state every now and then, then two bullets to the head is the solution.

Forget all this primal bull*****. It's a primal, immediate reaction. People who're showing that their primal, emotional instincts override their rational mind are generally people I try to avoid. Child molesters are just like this.

Controlling and channeling feelings is essential to functioning in modern society.

Do what is necessary, then think no more of it.