For another thread... Pick your questions/issues.
We don't need another thread since you post regularly on this forum. The content of what you post is there for anyone to read and to make a judgment on. It's not surprising that some find your views liberal. These labels aren't pulled out of thin air. If you feel you are just misunderstood well then take a look at your previous postings.
In addition Laz is also correct in that sometimes it's not just what you post but what you don't:
I have seen sandie slam a lot of these republicans but rarely if ever slam the much worse liberal socialist democrats.
Even tho... if you are not a socialist.. the democrats would enrage you.
The perceotions people get about what you are can often be a total of what you criticize and what you don't.
That is why some here, like sandie, are percieved to be socialists.
Keep an open mind and don't try to paint me into some preconceived picture you have drawn up in your head with some agenda you wish to assign to me.
Don't try and box me in man. I refuse to conform to your preconceived ideas and refuse to be shackled by your labels man...
If you object to labels so strongly you may want to try to avoid the stereotypical 'liberal' responses. I understand that very few liberals like to be called as such but there's no agenda surrounding my use of the word.
Now... Let's talk about Bruce Bartlett or maybe columnist Fred Barnes or maybe Doug Bandow or maybe William Bryk.
You still haven't expressed to us why you think these folks opinions are now relevant. Plenty of conservatives have been critical of Bush going back to early in his first term, some even before he was elected. Folks like myself, on this forum, have said that Bush is not a conservative years ago. I didn't vote for him or his father and have no real problem with folks criticizing him. He could very well end up being the worst Republican president we have had, next to Lincoln of course.
My agenda simply consists of trying to understand what is so
worth mentioning about the fact that Bush isn't so popular with conservatives. He is still better then the alternatives in the past 2 elections, but only by a hair.
FUNKED1
I call them out for going ad hominem instead of dealing with the topic at hand. So they... step up the ad hominem crap.
These guys have the debate skills of early hominids...
Referring to someone as a liberal is not an ad hominem. Liberals may not like being called liberals but it is what it is.
As for debating, what's to debate? I stated Pat is right now and has been right for some time. The only question is why is Pat's position now worthy or a topic?
