Originally posted by Momus--
That's a masterful fact-based point by point rebuttal of the presentation Grun.
Hard to rebut something point by point without having seen the film in its entirety.
I was merely stating how people blindly accept whatever their side be it right or left what is presenting to them as though it were gospel
So far from what Ive seen the film itself is a masterful fact based point by point rebuttal
Really its neither left nor right from a political standpoint
But to provoke independant thought. (yea yea I know. alot of people here are incapable of that without first checking with their political party first)
Basically it shows news clips as we normally see them here, as well as newsclips as to how they are presented elsewhere.
The contrasts are interesting
What is shown here. what isnt and more importantly HOW things are portrayed that shape our opinions.
Example. they mention how during a particular time period where the situation is discrobed as "Relitive calm" No Isrealies were killed but some 36 Palastinians were, 23 of them women and children.
Of course no mention of this is made by our media
Now think about it.
flip flop it. If it were 36 Isrealies that were killed, with the same ratio (26 women and children)
Would it still be presented as "Relitive Calm"?
And why is it only discribed as "Calm" when no Isrealies are dieing?
Seems to me "Calm" would be a good discription of the situation of nobody were dieing on either side