Author Topic: WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.  (Read 1070 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« on: May 23, 2001, 12:06:00 PM »
No open beta concerns me greatly.
I was going to pick it up, but now I will probably wait and see.

WWIIonline is certainly nothing that will case me to cancel my Aces High account.

------------------
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother

Bring the Mosquito FB.MkVI Series 2 to Aces High!!!

Sisu
-Karnak
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

SeaWulfe

  • Guest
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2001, 12:29:00 PM »
Yeah, it seems a lot of the guys that aren't playing the closed beta want it on June6th no matter what state it's in.

I've only got one thing to say about this whole deal:

B17II: The Mighty Eigth.
-SW
ps: Does no open beta mean they don't want freeloaders or they need money now or that it's not complete and therefore they are trying to trick people into buying it?

[This message has been edited by SeaWulfe (edited 05-23-2001).]

Offline NHFoxtro

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 134
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2001, 12:30:00 PM »
I read some of there topics yesturday in the playnet BBS, and some of there players don't think it will be ready for open beta June 6, like they had hoped for.

SeaWulfe

  • Guest
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2001, 12:34:00 PM »
Foxtro, there is NO open beta.. it's gone gold and will be available for purchase on june 6th.

Scheduled for release in June 2001, World War II Online™ revisits a time and place where real heroes lived and died in one of the most momentous wars in history. To enroll in one of the most exciting games of the year, visit Playnet.com today!

Atleast AH was free for several months while we worked through the major bugs. I can honestly say I feel comfortable paying 30$/mo for this... it's 100% more complete than most boxed games being sold today.
-SW

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2001, 12:54:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by SeaWulfe:
I've only got one thing to say about this whole deal:

B17II: The Mighty Eigth.

I have another thing to say:
Rowan's Battle of Britain.  

Offline fd ski

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1530
      • http://www.northotwing.com/wing/
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2001, 01:02:00 PM »
Trying to piggy back off the Pearl Harbour movie.. not a bad marketing really.. let's hope product won't disappoint.


------------------
Bartlomiej Rajewski
aka. Wing Commander fd-ski
Northolt Wing
1st Polish Fighter Wing
303 (Polish) Squadron "Kosciuszko" RAF
308 (Polish) Squadron "City of Cracow" RAF
315 (Polish) Squadron "City of Deblin" RAF

Turning 109s and 190s into scrap metal since 1998

Northolt Wing Headquarters

SeaWulfe

  • Guest
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2001, 01:10:00 PM »
The thing I don't like about WWIIOl and will keep me away from it no matter how good it is, is that someone can rise in rank and tell me what to do or assign me to do something. This guy might be good enough to accrue the necessary points to gain the rank, but is he good enough to lead? Doubt it.

Lots of impotent pint sized generals running around striving to be important.
-SW

Offline danish

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 440
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2001, 01:21:00 PM »
SeaWulfe
It should be perfectly possible to just lone wulfing to your hearts content.My guess is that most people ant any given time will do just that.

danish

SeaWulfe

  • Guest
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2001, 01:25:00 PM »
The way I understand it, it is entirely mission based. Or am I just reading it wrong?

Either way, in a few weeks we'll find out where it stands.
-SW

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2001, 01:27:00 PM »
I believe so, Danish.  Many missions will be server-generated too.  Not just by all of the l33t SnIpErS.

I don't think the Rat give a rat's bellybutton about an open beta.  The game is already the top seller at sbgames.com.

Offline Nifty

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4400
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2001, 01:36:00 PM »
They stated they'd test server loads, but put a cap on it.  They have yet to state how they plan to do this.  Whether it be an open download and then just first come first serve on the connections.  Meaning they set a cap on the server load at X.  If the X+1 person tries to log on, they get a server full message.  This is speculation on my part, but from what I read earlier, I think that might be how they're gonna do it.

Remember, open betas are used for two reasons.  To stress test the servers and to get promotion for the product.  They've got the promo part down, so they just need to stress the servers.  As to why this can be done after going gold?  More than likely any fixes on the server load will be done on the server software, not the client software.  If it is client related, that's what auto-patching is for.  There have been days were Ultima Online had 3 patches in a day for their client software.

It would be nice if there was a download to try the game offline to test out the flight model (or armor model for those types.)  As it is, I'm lucky in that a friend has pre-ordered it.  I'll just go fly on his account to see if it's worth splitting time with AH.  

As for June 6th...  uhmm, it's not the Pearl Harbor movie they're hitting at there...  Though doesn't make much sense that their initial campaign is the 1940 Blitzkrieg if they're trying to take advantage of D-Day.    I guess it all works out tho, the Pearl Harbor movie, Enemy at the Gate was just out, and D-Day release...  
proud member of the 332nd Flying Mongrels, noses in the wind since 1997.

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2001, 01:37:00 PM »
SW you don't have to do anything you don't like in WWIIOL, Just like in AH.

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2001, 03:40:00 PM »
Although I was tempted to pre-order it to be shipped from the States, I think I'll wait until an official UK release. At least that way I can take it back to the shop if it stinks.

It seems they expect people to buy a game that has no stand-alone function despite the fact that their servers have not been tested to satisfy the huge number of pre-ordering customers.

I really hope that it's not a triumph of hype over quality.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Mickey1992

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #13 on: May 23, 2001, 04:12:00 PM »
OK, I hate Lum The Mad as much as anyone else, but........
 http://www.lumthemad.net/news/2021.php

Offline Professor Fate

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 167
WWIIonline seems to have gone gold without an open beta.
« Reply #14 on: May 23, 2001, 05:04:00 PM »
dang Mickey I just found it and came running here to post it.
 http://www.lumthemad.net/news/2021.php

there did it anyways  

   
I AM PROFESSOR FATE



[This message has been edited by Professor Fate (edited 05-23-2001).]