nukes

[captkaos]

Before you can get a nuke, we need the B-29.  Need the right plane to carry it.

Besides, why would you want a Nuke.  Kill the HQ, Kill one city, one base, one airfield.  In this game a Nuke would be fun, but it would also be silly, so lets keep the Nukes out of this game.

[JB88]

well, actually it would best be alloted as a base destroyer.

it would be extremely expensive and would take a very very long time to accumulate enough perks to use it.

it would be used best just like it was.  to gain a major strategic tactical advantage.

it would vaporize everything within radius.

all humor aside, its just not that unreasonable for a game that prides itself on historical accuracy, has events based upon real battles and whose fanbase may always be interested in possibility.

could be fun if you look at it from another angle.  

no less so than a ride in a 262 come crunch time.

and yes.  you would need the 29.  maybe that is what you would get out of the hanger and one of its load outs could be the fat man or little boy.

[Lusche]

Originally posted by JB88
besides.  i would love to see V-1 and V-2 rockets... they were often shot down by fighter planes if i recall correctly.

V1 was no rocket
V2 was a rocket, and thus never shot down by a fighter (not that easy to intercept a 3400mph ballistic missile)

EDIT:
an accuracy was so bad that you would not hit anything in this game. Both weapons even had a hard time hitting london...

[JB88]

well, i thought that i had heard something...not what i had remembered but they were intercepted none the less.

v1 yes.  v2 no.  call it a draw.

[Lusche]

Originally posted by JB88
well, i thought that i had heard something...not what i had remembered but they were intercepted none the less.

v1 yes.  v2 no.  call it a draw.

I never said that V1 was not intercepted

[JB88]

that is true.

you win.

: )



but i still want nukes.

[Bogie603rd]

Originally posted by JB88
its just not that unreasonable for a game that prides itself on historical accuracy

Whoever said this game was based on historical accuracy? It has historical models, its not based on historical accuracy. Otherwise they wouldn't have allowed us H2H porkies to use the Terrain Editor!

[JB88]

is it just me or does this room need a little air.

(opening window...air comes pouring in)

phew!

aha!  who's pile of dirty socks are lying over there next to the skuzzy in a speedo poster.

that's just twisted man.  

anywho...yes, in regards to planes, there is a strict code of historical accuracy, down to not allowing non authentic schemes or planes which were not used in combat during the war.

that was my meaning anyhow.

so rather than sitting here and cherry picking every little thing that i say, how bout we play nice and stay on topic.

please and thank you.


nukes.  just a suggestion.  we can make it through this conversation.  i just know it.


peace and love fellas.



88

[Bogie603rd]

I believe this conversation should be terminated!

[hubsonfire]

Ending a request for a nuclear weapon with "peace and love"

That's some of that there irony, ain't it?

No Nooks!

[stephen]

Just Say No ......................

to Nuclear proliferation, not to mention no radiation affects, no blinding flash that would blind any pilot in the vicinity, no lingering dust cloud..............Somone try to model a bomb with a 2 mile blast radius and more than just my PC are gonna crap out...

OH yeah, bring the B-29 into the fold,,and perk the absolute snot out of it.

[JB88]

you are wayyyyyyy to close to me mr. stephen of panama city.


tick tick tick....

[Lye-El]

[Dichotomy]

if not a nuke how about a FAE or a MOAB?  I mean come on.. let one plane decimate a base

[JB88]