Author Topic: Spit 14 and Spit 16  (Read 1165 times)

Offline bkbandit

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #15 on: September 01, 2006, 05:15:49 PM »
it just sucks that ur average spitfire guy ruins the rep of the spit, i see one now and almost automaticly i say "look at this dweeb". In my begining dweeb stage i flew it:lol ,  but they as my tactics hanged and progressed(also all the dweeb calls lifts u out of that 16 fast) it couldnt give me what i wanted. In the m/a enviroment where everybody flyin in the weeds spitfire is a great performer, but up higher things change.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #16 on: September 01, 2006, 05:39:59 PM »
There is nothing more deadly in AH than a well flown Spitfire.
IMHO
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline simshell

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #17 on: September 01, 2006, 05:46:51 PM »
i mainly flew alot of f4u's  109s yak  a lettle bit of everthing depending on the week i felt like flying

but whenever i flew the spitfire it was a vacation from all the work needed to win dogfights in other aircraft   i loved to use the Spitfire as a E-fighter     its great in that role  using the climbing abilty great Accleration easy handling great diver and then finely finishing it off with that amazing agilty      made it a real treat to fly

and we now have 2 better Energy spitfires the 14 and the 16

of course the 14 being better but costly
known as Arctic in the main

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #18 on: September 01, 2006, 06:05:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
There is nothing more deadly in AH than a well flown Spitfire.
IMHO


There's the key though.  There aren't that many well flown Spits.  Lots that flat turn thinking they can out turn everything but not many that use the vertical or throttle management in the fight.

You KNOW when you've found one of them
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #19 on: September 02, 2006, 12:26:43 AM »
Not one of those planes WW listed has hispanos.

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #20 on: September 02, 2006, 12:48:21 AM »
Just like the La that suprise a lot with its performance, the spit 16 is a specialized low alt fighter. Most american fighters were designed for high alt work and those with sperchargers (P47, P38) were specialized for it. Germans compromised with their main models but had plenty of specialized subtypes.

The MA is a low alt combat enviroment. This is why Russian models do very well as well as the low alt spit model - the XVI. If fightes were at 25-30k, the La7 and spit 16 would have been poor rides, while spit 14 and P47N would have been outrageous.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #21 on: September 02, 2006, 03:18:08 AM »
25-30K also favours the Spit IX and VIII....
Funny how it went, - fisrt it was a race for higher and higher altitude, then they modded them for lower jobs.
BTW did they ever modify a griffon engined Spit for low alt?
(Oh I know about the XII :))
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #22 on: September 02, 2006, 03:46:52 AM »
Dont know if anyone said this or anything yet, and this is the most intricate, fancy detail I know about spits: Notice something different about the 14??? other than the fact that the engine is half again as large, its got a 5 bladed propeller. Its fast alright, but it also had severe torque problems on take-off and landing.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #23 on: September 02, 2006, 05:30:38 AM »
Hehe, already in WW2 the ultimate Spit solved that, - the Spit 21.
They had a contra-prop (double), so no particular torque problem.
BTW, a report I read recently was about a comparison between the Mk IX and the XIV. It was mentioned that the turn capabilty was equal which I belive is not the case in AH.
Flew the XIV the other day it's one hell of a bird.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #24 on: September 02, 2006, 05:57:01 AM »
the RAF late war rides are crippled by torque.  something which does not seem to effect other late war aircraft in the game.  The typhoon/tempest barely roll at slow speeds against the torque, the spit 14 has an odd rudder input because of torque which messes up aim.  LA7 N1K do not seem to have any adverse affects from torque and 109 is limited.

I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #25 on: September 02, 2006, 06:06:58 AM »
Actually Furby I'd say the 109's suffer from Tourqe just as much at slow speeds. Ever tried rolling a 109 at 150mph to the right? Hardly works at all.

But for spits and 109's this is very accurate IMO, smapp light plane with a big a** engine is bound to create some tourqe.

It is weirder with the Tiffies though.

The Ki84 should have far more tourqe aswell I think, as should pretty much every US bird.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #26 on: September 02, 2006, 12:08:39 PM »
Spit 14 falls flat on its face in MA, unless by some act of God you actualy run into an nme ftr above 15k, its not worth the perks, and most of the guys that DO pay the price wind up getting killed below 10k by spits that are much more nimble at lower alts.
Of course this is an opinion, and we know that they are worth a pee hole in the snow, lol.
Good pilots are always gonna argue the advantages of the perk monsters, and how they dominate, but its like any other plane, if you fly it outside its element your gonna die, and more often than not that spit14 just comes up short in a straight on turn fight, of course there is the vertical......:t
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #27 on: September 02, 2006, 12:36:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MiloMorai
Krusty instead of making dumb comments about a book, you should go buy it so that you have some idea about Spitfires.

What book? Spirfire: The History


I just saw this.

WTF? Dude I made NO references to any books. Get off the crack.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #28 on: September 02, 2006, 12:59:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by stephen
Spit 14 falls flat on its face in MA, unless by some act of God you actualy run into an nme ftr above 15k, its not worth the perks, and most of the guys that DO pay the price wind up getting killed below 10k by spits that are much more nimble at lower alts.
Of course this is an opinion, and we know that they are worth a pee hole in the snow, lol.
Good pilots are always gonna argue the advantages of the perk monsters, and how they dominate, but its like any other plane, if you fly it outside its element your gonna die, and more often than not that spit14 just comes up short in a straight on turn fight, of course there is the vertical......:t


Problem is, people think the Spit 14 should turn like a 5.  It's by far the heaviest Spit in the game.  It can turn, but it won't turn like the Merlin Spits can.  It's much more of an energy fighter with a good climb rate.  Flown right it should beat the other Spits.

Again it comes down to knowing the difference between Spit variants. Always remember the guy who tried to turn fight me in a Spit 14 while I was in a 5.  It was no contest.   There was no way he was going to turn inside the much lighter Spit 5 in a flat turn..  He had no concept of the vertical either which made it worse for him.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Spit 14 and Spit 16
« Reply #29 on: September 02, 2006, 01:02:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
I just saw this.

WTF? Dude I made NO references to any books. Get off the crack.


I think his point Krusty, was sometimes it seems like you throw comments out and hope they stick, while those of us reading it are wondering where are you getting your information.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters