Originally posted by Krusty
There you have it wrong. The performance and total UFO flight model is where all the grumbling comes from.
Krusty, for every guy who understands what the 16 is, there are 10 who think that because it's numbered 16 it should be better then 14.
What does it do that a 1945 Spitfire LFIXe shouldn't do?
the MA airwar is fought at the alts that the XVI was optimised for. I fly the 38G almost all the time, with an occasional J or L flight. I don't ever recall being 'fearful' of fighting a 16. If I run up against someone like Stang in an 16, they'll more often then not get me in my G, but more often then not if its an average AH pilot I kill the 16 and I'm an average stick at best.
I just don't see what the fuss is all about. When I was flying the 8 or 9 and fought 16s I could beat them unless it was a really good stick as the 16 drivers think they'll outturn the longer spanned wing IX or VIII.
Just because you see lots of 16s doesn't mean it's uber, anymore then the LA7, N1K or 51D like the majority of AH drivers fly.
THe average AH stick wants something he thinks he can win in and is easier to fly so they take what fits that. The Spit is an easy bird to feel like you are a better stick when you fly it cause it does a lot of things well. The real Spit did that too.
I've mentioned it before, but I was talking to a current Spit driver at Duxford last year. He said it was almost unfair how easy the Spit was to fly. His comment was they should have started training in Spits and moved to Tiger Moths afterwards as the Spit is so forgiving. When he and another pilot flew their Spit V and Hurricane II to Malta last September for the "Merlins over Malta" bit, they both wanted to fly the Hurricane because it was more of a challenge to fly.
So what have they overmodelled in the AH Spit? Sure sounds like the real Spit flew that way too
