The love story is kept as a subplot where it belongs.
All in all a good movie. Not great, but good. There were some great moments showing the sense of honor between pilots during WWI that disappeared over the 30 years leading up to WWII (and one or two exhibitions of behavior that'll make some of the MA denizens feel RIGHT at home). The "villain," so to speak, I think did a good job at making you WANT to see how he receives his come-uppance (which those are about the best type of villains).
The final CG work was FAR and away superior to Pearl Harbor, IMO. Granted that's saying very little, but there's not really many comparable examples (as stated, you can't compare what they're trying to do here what was done on Star Wars).
Incidentally, I HAVE noticed that the majority of negative reviews have largely been from people who have absolutely no clue about the history behind the movie (I found the many critics blasting the character of Skinner as being the "anachronistic token black guy" hilarious).
Speaking of which, anyone know why they didn't use any of the REAL people as characters except for Thenault? Skinner was CLEARLY based on Bullard, so why not use that and make it clear this WAS a real person, not just PC Hollywood bull*****?