Author Topic: Flying the Me 163?  (Read 2928 times)

Offline JOACH1M

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9813
Re: Flying the Me 163?
« Reply #30 on: August 16, 2012, 09:11:42 PM »
too bad the gear have no breaks if you keep them  :cry
holy punt.  :rolleyes:
FEW ~ BK's ~ AoM
Focke Wulf Me / Last Of The GOATS 🐐
ToC 2013 & 2017 Champ
R.I.P My Brothers <3

Offline RedBull1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: Flying the Me 163?
« Reply #31 on: August 16, 2012, 09:37:58 PM »
"There is absolutely no point discussing anything on the BBS, it's mostly populated by people who are right about everything, no one listens and everyone is just talking. People will argue over the shape of an egg." -Anonymous

Offline Scca

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
Re: Flying the Me 163?
« Reply #32 on: August 17, 2012, 01:16:59 PM »
....come up a few feet short of the rearm pad trying to ferry one to the front lines...

I tried that once and did the same thing. 

I upped a 163, kept the gear and went slow to the next base and landed.  I ran out of fuel and coasted to maybe 3 feet short of the rearm pad....   :furious
Flying as AkMeathd - CO Arabian Knights
Working on my bbs cred one post at a time

http://www.arabian-knights.org

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Flying the Me 163?
« Reply #33 on: August 21, 2012, 08:33:57 PM »


Whats that for anyway?

     Ram Air Turbine for generating electricity.  The early Phantoms had them, but they werer removed when they figured out that the
10 minutes left on the battery without engine power would last until the aircraft augered.  Think the glide ratio was 8 plane lengths down
for every one forward.  Try tossing a brick out the cockpit and flying formation with it to simulate  :D
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: Flying the Me 163?
« Reply #34 on: August 21, 2012, 08:41:48 PM »
    Ram Air Turbine for generating electricity.  The early Phantoms had them, but they werer removed when they figured out that the
10 minutes left on the battery without engine power would last until the aircraft augered.  Think the glide ratio was 8 plane lengths down
for every one forward.  Try tossing a brick out the cockpit and flying formation with it to simulate  :D

My bird, "The Lead Sled". The only reason it has lift is due to thrust, take that away & falling brick... no glide ratio. :old:

WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Flying the Me 163?
« Reply #35 on: August 21, 2012, 11:16:02 PM »
     I worked the pointy end of some E models, those engine guys were solid soot/grease from the elbows to the fingers  :lol
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: Flying the Me 163?
« Reply #36 on: August 22, 2012, 01:54:20 PM »
 Had a hydrlics troop I knew in Korea who soaked all his fatigues in hydrolic fluic so the would all be the same Colorado without spots...shop chief made him throw them away...4 new sets. :ahand :rofl
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,