Author Topic: Blair's admin dealt fatal blow by the resignation of seven members of his Government  (Read 393 times)

Offline xrtoronto

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4219
Tony Blair's administration has been dealt what may turn out to be a fatal blow by the resignation of seven members of his Government.    
Tony Blair is unlikely to survive for another 12 months

Tom Watson, the under-secretary of state for defence, wrote to Mr Blair this morning telling him that it was no longer in the interests of Labour or of the country for him to remain Prime Minister.

This afternoon six parliamentary private secretaries - MPs on the lowest rung of the Government ladder - also handed in their resignations.

Khalid Mahmood, Wayne David, Ian Lucas, Mark Tami and David Wright said they had to leave because Mr Blair had not "ended the uncertainty" over when he intends to step down.

Chris Mole also quit his post as parliamentary private secretary to Phil Woolas, communities minister.

The Prime Minister responded immediately by describing Mr Watson as "disloyal, discourteous and wrong" and saying that he had planned to fire him anyway.

And he warned Labour MPs that they risk consigning the party to electoral defeat if they continue to call for his resignation.

The six Government members who resigned today are all understood to be among the 17 MPs who signed a confidential letter to Mr Blair yesterday urging him to name a date for his departure.

Mr Watson's resignation will have all the more impact as he is known as a Blairite loyalist, who formerly served as a Government whip and was expected to rise through the ministerial ranks under the Prime Minister.

In his letter, released to the press, Mr Watson wrote: "It is with the greatest sadness that I have to say that I no longer believe that your remaining in office is in the interest of either the party or the country.

"How and why this situation has arisen no longer matters. I share the view of the overwhelming majority of the party and the country that the only way the party and the Government can renew itself in office is urgently to renew its leadership."

Last night it was reported that Mr Blair had set a date for his departure of May 31 next year, in an effort to curb demands for his immediate resignation.

An eight-week leadership election campaign will follow allowing a new leader — the favourite being Gordon Brown — to be chosen by July 26, when Mr Blair will step down as Prime Minister.

No 10 described the claims as "speculative" but refused to deny their accuracy.

If true, it would validate a report in The Daily Telegraph at the end of June that Mr Blair had decided to go next May after 10 years as Prime Minister.

Yesterday two Blairite Cabinet ministers, David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, and Hilary Armstrong, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said they expected Mr Blair to go within a year.    

The decision by Cabinet ministers to place a limit of a year on Mr Blair's tenure reflected mounting panic in Downing Street as up to 100 Labour backbenchers prepared to sign demands for him to set a clear timetable for departure.

The Prime Minister infuriated colleagues last week by suggesting he would not be pushed into making public a timetable for his departure.

But since then aides have suggested he did not mean to appear defiant and had intended to reassure MPs he would not "go on and on".

Frustration at the refusal to offer clarity about a departure date boiled over yesterday.

Three letters circulated among MPs demanding that he make his intention clear. Many of those who signed an initial letter sent to Mr Blair were formerly loyal supporters of the New Labour project.

Last night, Labour sources cast doubt on whether Mr Blair could last until May.

During a day of high drama Mr Blair had been left with little option but to clear up the confusion.

It emerged that angry backbenchers were planning to send a delegation of party grandees to Downing Street within days to demand that he set a firm timetable.

The Prime Minister has resisted going public with a date, fearing that his authority would drain away in the last months in office.

It was also disclosed that a party whip, Kevin Brennan, whose job is to discipline rebellious MPs, wrote separately to the Prime Minister expressing his view that he should go. There was no disciplinary action against him.

The claims of a May 31 resignation surfaced in The Sun, often used as a Government mouthpiece. Labour backbenchers were likening the atmosphere inside their party to the turmoil in Tory ranks before Margaret Thatcher's downfall at the hands of rebel ministers in 1990.

Senior MPs said they now distrusted Mr Blair so profoundly that they would dispatch senior party figures to express their collective view to him face to face, before this month's party conference.

Several MPs claimed cracks were appearing in the Cabinet and named Jack Straw, the Leader of the Commons and Peter Hain, the Northern Ireland Secretary, among those considering confronting Mr Blair over his departure date. Adding to speculation, a leaked Downing Street memo suggested that planning for the hand over to a successor was well in train — despite repeated denials.

A five-page document leaked to the Daily Mirror suggests that Mr Blair needs to "go with the crowds wanting more" and sets out plans for a nationwide "farewell tour". That includes appearances on television programmes such as Blue Peter and Songs of Praise in his final month in office.

David Hill, Mr Blair's director of communications, said the memo had not been seen by the Prime Minister or other senior aides.

As well as Mr Watson, a supporter of Mr Brown, the signatories to the letter from the 17 MPs in the 2001 intake to Parliament included up to six parliamentary aides to ministers.

Among them were Mr Mahmood, Mr David, Mr Lucas and Mr Wright.

Frantic attempts to shore up Mr Blair's authority were launched by senior Downing Street staff who telephoned MPs to try to persuade them to sign rival letters supporting the Prime Minister.

By early evening 49 MPs had signed the supportive version, urging Mr Blair to stick to his guns by refusing to lay out a detailed timetable in public.

Many MPs reported, however, that they had rejected Downing Street's offer in no uncertain terms.

c&p

WTG England:aok

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Was wondering why we hadnt seen much MP activity on the boards as of late ;)
Wonder which MP is left.
Bet its MP8 LOL
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2006, 11:19:45 PM by MP4 »
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline xrtoronto

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4219
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.


How about any one of the below (from not later than the past 48 hours) :

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=186538

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=186491

http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=186413



ps: how embarrassing for you;)
« Last Edit: September 06, 2006, 11:19:59 PM by MP4 »

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
xtoronto, could you post the source link with a title at the top, then type your own gist and notable quotes after that?
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Trikky

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 370
He wants to serve longer than Thatcher, though what the poll tax did for her, wars will do for him.

Offline Momus--

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 651
Blair is a tory stooge; he's just holding on long enough to ensure that his successor can't actually make any significant policy changes before the next election.

You think it is coincidence that "Tony Blair MP" is an anagram of "I'm Tory Plan B"?  :noid

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
It's also "PARTLY MOB IN" and "PLAIN MOB TRY" so be careful...
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
Can't the parlament out him with a vote of no confidence? What's with all the grandstanding?

Offline xrtoronto

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4219
Quote
Originally posted by Mini D
Can't the parlament out him with a vote of no confidence? What's with all the grandstanding?


watch for that happening in canada sometime soon re: steve harper

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Not to worry, Blair will always have a home in the trailer behind the Klinton Library :p
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Quote
Originally posted by Mini D
Can't the parlament out him with a vote of no confidence? What's with all the grandstanding?


No, parliment can force the Labour government to disolve.  But as Labour has a majority of seats, this probably won't happen.  And they probably don't want to risk an election and lose power.


Labour is dealing with Blair internally, as their head of the party, not as the Prime Minister of the government.

If Blair steps down, another Labour member will become head of the party. And by default, the new Prime Minister of the government.

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Quote
Originally posted by xrtoronto
watch for that happening in canada sometime soon re: steve harper



Canada doesn't want another freaking election, it won't happen.