Originally posted by Elfie
1) Torture isnt viewed in the same way in every part of the world. In the West we believe torture is inherently evil. In other parts of the world it is viewed as a legitimate interrogation tactic.
Oh well that makes it perfectly acceptable then.
So you condone the torture, because it's "viewed as a legitimate interrogation tactic"? And why is it a legitimate interrogation tactic under the US-draughted and approved Iraqi constitution?
Especially as it's expressly forbidden in two Articles:
Article 9 D. The Iraqi National Intelligence Service shall collect information, assess threats to national security, and advise the Iraqi government. This service shall be under civilian control and shall be subject to legislative oversight and shall operate in accordance with the law and pursuant to the recognized principles of human rights.
Article 35:
B. No person may be kept in custody or interrogated except in the context of a judicial decision.
C. All forms of psychological and physical torture and inhumane treatment shall be prohibited. Any confession coerced by force, threat, or torture shall not be relied on. The victim shall have the right to compensation in accordance with the law for material and moral damages incurred.
2)This coming from someone that lives in China, with China's human rights record is just rich. Tianamen (sp) square anyone?
I know this may come as a bit of a shock but not everyone slavishly justifies and agrees with everything their government does as being right and good.
And aren't you just a little bit ashamed that you're defending and justifying the use of torture whilst "someone that lives in China, with China's human rights record" is telling you that its use by the newly US-installed Iraqi government does indeed "show Americans or Bush in a bad light"?
Besides which, it's somewhat of an
ad straw hominen: torture is illegal in my little special administrative region corner of China -- Guantanamo SOP and "extraordinary rendition" (out-sourced torture) included.