Rook tendencies for anti-logic

[Atoon]

Originally posted by KONG1
Maybe it puzzles you because you’ve always been sort of logical.

If by "sort of logical" you mean I have the ability to distinguish a question from a compliant, then call it what you will.

You don't seem to posess any logic regarding the matter. If you do- you have been unable to present any, just derogatory comments with no fact or foundation.

[Whisky58]

Originally posted by Atoon
So we have this game with 3 countries at war, why is it Rooks insist on dividing the knits & bish? more often than I care to count I have logged on & seen that the rooks have taken most if not all fields between the bish & knits. What could possibley be gained from this strategy?

 

Well there's been a lot of armchair philosophy & hot air about "strategy" and "winning the war" when the answer is simple & obvious.

Rooks are twice as talented and skilled as Bishops & Knights and therefore in order to bring a little competition into the game must fight on two fronts against twice the number of opponents.

[SlapShot]

Originally posted by Atoon
yall are BOTH confused, this has NOTHING to do with any reset---


Just wondering what the logic could be, behind dividing the other 2 countries so they cannot fight each other. Thats it.

There is no foundation or reasonable explanation for that type of logic.

"Stupid is ... as stupid does"

[Donzo]

Originally posted by SlapShot
Then blame it on player stupidity and greed to W1N TH3 W@Rz!!!! for the almighty 25 perk reward ... not the arena ... nor the amount of people in the arena.

It's the people.

Answer me this...

Why is there an entire section in the help files for AHII that outlines the capturing of territory?  

Why is this a part of the game?  

Why does the help file not outline when it is/is not acceptable to capture certain bases?

Where's the section in the help file about furballing?

[KONG1]

Atool,

Since you “have the ability to distinguish a question from a compliant”, and your “reading comprehension is great”, and being “the logical sort” maybe you can figure out if the following is a question, a complaint, an insult, or a joke:

How come goof-balls assume that if they can’t understand something everyone else is confused?

[SlapShot]

Originally posted by Donzo
Answer me this...

Why is there an entire section in the help files for AHII that outlines the capturing of territory?  

Why is this a part of the game?  

Why does the help file not outline when it is/is not acceptable to capture certain bases?

Where's the section in the help file about furballing?

1) Because it needs to be explained for those who need to achieve that goal. All games have directions.

2) Because HT made it that way. I have heard that it was introduced to create confict which in turn would result in much Air-to-Air combat and those who fought the best ... got to take the base ... outside of that ... you need to get the reason as to "why" from HT.

3) There is no need to explain when it is/is not acceptable to capture certain bases ... HTC explained the goal, its up to the players to figure how best to achieve the goal ... much like Atoon has ... he has figured out that its not good to split the fronts ... looks like the majority of the others haven't ... live and learn.

4) What does furballing have to do with this post ? ... or are you trying to create a hi-jack of what this thread is all about ? Furballing (Air-to-Air Combat) needs no explaination.

[toon]

how is any of this going to help me shoot down multiples v. me?

[hubsonfire]

Originally posted by COBA94
how is any of this going to help me shoot down multiples v. me?

Nothing is going to help you with that.

[Lye-El]

Originally posted by Atoon
In fact most of the time 1 country drives a wedge between the other 2, they lose.

Yep, bad decision. Same bad decision happens all the time. It's nothing new. People will jump from the base they just acquired to the next closest base that happens to lead them up the middle rather than all agreeing to go after some far off base.....that none will agree on which one that should be.

[BugsBunny]

Originally posted by Atoon
So we have this game with 3 countries at war, why is it Rooks insist on dividing the knits & bish? more often than I care to count I have logged on & seen that the rooks have taken most if not all fields between the bish & knits. What could possibley be gained from this strategy?

A few rooks tried to take an outside the middle base, and we came very close to doing so, but the knits were able to switch to defense as they had available resources due to the fact they were only fighting 1 front. They had only 1 front because rooks had separated them from the bish. Meanwhile the bish & the knits BOTH held bases on the outside edges that were originally Rook bases.

This scenario happens often & I just can't comprehend why.... whats the logic?

Well, if you could understand that, you would also be a General.  Just follow my orders and dont ask any questions.

[Atoon]

Originally posted by KONG1
Atool,

Since you “have the ability to distinguish a question from a compliant”, and your “reading comprehension is great”, and being “the logical sort” maybe you can figure out if the following is a question, a complaint, an insult, or a joke:

How come goof-balls assume that if they can’t understand something everyone else is confused?

I'll just take the high road here, and not make fun of your handle even though several good ones come to mind. I'll also let you think of your text how ever you see fit, it's way more important to you than it ever will be to me.

Have a nice day & thanks for your participation:aok


As for the few possible reasons for this situation, I like whisky58s the best