Author Topic: Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi  (Read 1284 times)

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« on: September 18, 2006, 02:19:41 PM »
Yamato vs Musashi

On blue print, which ship is the best.  Which ship took more punishment from torps/bombs/rockets?

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2006, 02:32:04 PM »
The best battleship class to ever sail was the Iowa class.

One Iowa prolly could have taken on either of those Japanese tubs and won.

Check out this cool page for info on Both


Offline mentalguy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2006, 08:32:40 PM »
On blueprint?




USS Montana Class
PFC. Corey "Mentalguy" Gibson
USMC

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2006, 01:09:55 AM »
Go Team America!
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2006, 01:15:35 AM »
Battleships were outdated by WWI and were totally annihilated by carrier fleets in WWII. So they were nothing but megaexpensive symbols of naval power at best.

The US navy knew it and that's why also the Iowa class was put to mothballs for decades. They were only revived later because of lack of suitable cruisers and the fact that they had cost an arm and a leg to build with little to no use under the hood.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2006, 01:35:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
Battleships were outdated by WWI and were totally annihilated by carrier fleets in WWII. So they were nothing but megaexpensive symbols of naval power at best.

The US navy knew it and that's why also the Iowa class was put to mothballs for decades. They were only revived later because of lack of suitable cruisers and the fact that they had cost an arm and a leg to build with little to no use under the hood.


Who cares, they're effin' cool.
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2006, 06:29:40 AM »
Well since they were sister ships. It's hard to make a statment on which one was the best.

That's like comapring the Nagato and Mustsu.

Or the  Bismark and Tirpitz.

Or the Missouri and New Jersey.

Or the South Dakota and Alabama.

Or the Arizona and Pennsylvania.

Or the Texas and New York.
As far as how much punishment.................. You have to also look at where the punishment was as much as the number of hits. 5 hits by bombs that glance off armour or explode topside are not going to do as much damage as one that explodes punching a hole below the water line, or hitting an ammunition magazine.

But I will go out on a limb and say.

The Shinano , the third sister of the Yamato clan. She was converted to a carrier during her construction because of the Japanese carrier losses of 1942/43. Although she was sunk on her maiden voyage without launching one aircraft. She had the potential to be the best. Also this was the largest
aircraft carrier ever launched until the CVN USS Enterprise in the early 60's.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17773
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2006, 07:20:09 AM »
No offence but,

Seems to me he asked which ws better between the Yamato vs Musashi.

I dont see anywhere where he mentioned a comparison between either of those and any American tub.
So I dont see how they even enter the discussion
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17773
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2006, 07:23:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
Battleships were outdated by WWI and were totally annihilated by carrier fleets in WWII. So they were nothing but megaexpensive symbols of naval power at best.

The US navy knew it and that's why also the Iowa class was put to mothballs for decades. They were only revived later because of lack of suitable cruisers and the fact that they had cost an arm and a leg to build with little to no use under the hood.


Seems to me they proved quite useful in supporitng invasion troops
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #9 on: September 19, 2006, 07:30:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
No offence but,

Seems to me he asked which ws better between the Yamato vs Musashi.

I dont see anywhere where he mentioned a comparison between either of those and any American tub.
So I dont see how they even enter the discussion


None taken, in fact you're correct. I was trying to make the point it's hard to determine which one is best because they are sister ships. Same class , basically same blueprints. I just got carried away in the examples.:)

However I still fail to see the point of the question. It's almost like asking which H2 hummer is better based on VIN#s

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2006, 11:36:17 AM »
Quote
Seems to me they proved quite useful in supporitng invasion troops


They did provide marginal support with the few guns they carried. Then again, most battleships were hunted down and sunk in WW2 by carrier fleets.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2006, 11:49:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
They did provide marginal support with the few guns they carried. Then again, most battleships were hunted down and sunk in WW2 by carrier fleets.


Oh yeah? What US battleships were sunk after December 7th?

In fact most sunk that day went on to fight the rest of the war.

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2006, 01:46:27 PM »
Oh yeah get a life tard the US is not the entire planet.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline B@tfinkV

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5751
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2006, 01:55:46 PM »
fruity!
 400 yrds on my tail, right where i want you... [/size]

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Monster warships: Yamato vs Musashi
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2006, 02:09:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
Oh yeah get a life tard the US is not the entire planet.


Nice way to admit your wrong.


And the US is the only part of the planet that maters. Where is finland again? Oh yeah, no one cares. :D