Author Topic: Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial  (Read 4477 times)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #165 on: October 06, 2006, 02:25:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKH
Watching it won't stop it boiling ;)


You are unfamiliar with the old saying?
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #166 on: October 06, 2006, 02:34:48 PM »
Ok.. we are making progress...  we can all pretty much go with the boiling water theory... put enough heat under it and it will boil.

What that has to do with the current global warming issue is a little vauge tho...

Do you mean that if we all held our breath or quit driving cars the water would take longer to boil?

lazs

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #167 on: October 06, 2006, 02:41:30 PM »
Actually, so long as the pressure is great enough the water won't boil but I guess that's beside the point.  ;)

Offline indy007

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3294
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #168 on: October 06, 2006, 02:47:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lukster
Actually, so long as the pressure is great enough the water won't boil but I guess that's beside the point.  ;)


If you use distilled water and microwave it (causing the molecules to rub together extremely fast), it will be superheated but perfectly calm... and then introduce impurities into it (like a metal spoon), it will explode into steam.

Kinda neat. :)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #169 on: October 06, 2006, 02:48:08 PM »
Co2 in the air should matter too but how much will someone in china holding his breath change the time it takes to boil my water?

lazs

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #170 on: October 06, 2006, 04:11:55 PM »
Bottom line is that if under a static heating, such as our sun is providing us with (we are incredibly accurately close and yet not too far etc), one needs a certain amount of warming gases (established science) to warm the sphere up. Punktum. Doesn't matter where you are, and same goes to the chinaman. If you bring the globe up to the boiling point, you'll be sharing the same bubblebath.
Rather uncomfortable.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #171 on: October 06, 2006, 05:27:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
Bottom line is that if under a static heating, such as our sun is providing us with


Quote
Nasa Earth Observatory The ACRIM I instrument was the first to clearly demonstrate that the total radiant energy emanating from the sun was not a constant, and varied in proportion to solar magnetic activity. However, the sun’s output changes so slowly and solar variability is so slight (less than 0.00425% of the total energy per year on time scales of days), that continuous monitoring by state-of-the-art instrumentation is necessary to detect changes with climate significance. Scientists theorize that as much as 25% of the 20th century anticipated global warming of the Earth may be due to changes in the sun’s energy output.  
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!


Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #173 on: October 07, 2006, 06:47:57 AM »
It's not a constant. Just very close to it...at the moment.
Eventually the sun goes wild and will gobble up our blueball before making "pop" and becoming a smallball. Another thing.
However, THE BOTTOM LINE is that with enough greenhouse gases it is possible to:

A. Warm the earths atmosphere

B. Bring it to a very hot point.


If the solar activity is up, this doesn't get better.....sad but true.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #174 on: October 07, 2006, 09:24:48 AM »
Ok...so one chinaman not breathing should affect the time it takes to boil water right?

Is that important enough to make him stop breathing?

lazs

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #175 on: October 07, 2006, 10:07:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by indy007
but wait... there's more...

Solar Irradiance Reconstruction

Sun more active than for a millennium

Sunspots are more frequent now than any time for 1000 years

The sun is more active now than the last 8000 years


Yeah but there's nothing we can do about the sun so what's the point in noticing it may be the cause of our slight temperature rise? No political power to be gained there. ;)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #176 on: October 07, 2006, 10:25:34 AM »
If solar effectiveness is up, greenhouse effect means even more trouble.

And Lazs, - Chinamen would be a heck of trouble if their emissions per persons were as high as pr. US citizen ...
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #177 on: October 07, 2006, 10:28:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
If solar effectiveness is up, greenhouse effect means even more trouble.

And Lazs, - Chinamen would be a heck of trouble if their emissions per persons were as high as pr. US citizen ...


What "trouble" might that be? I've seen a few of the disaster movies but I'm not inclined to put any faith in them.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #178 on: October 07, 2006, 03:16:53 PM »
Lukster, - grenhouse effect is a fact. That's why people in colder areas of the globe (nothing very cold, since Holland is the record breaker in greenhouse building) build...greenhouses.
This effect can also be done with the correct gases.
If you emit enough, you will hit the effect....which is being manifested.
This may go to more than a slight "trouble", so a disaster movie scenario might actually occur.
For real-based disaster movies about things that shouldn't have happened, start with Titanic. Unsinkable...
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial
« Reply #179 on: October 07, 2006, 03:19:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
Lukster, - grenhouse effect is a fact. That's why people in colder areas of the globe (nothing very cold, since Holland is the record breaker in greenhouse building) build...greenhouses.
This effect can also be done with the correct gases.
If you emit enough, you will hit the effect....which is being manifested.
This may go to more than a slight "trouble", so a disaster movie scenario might actually occur.
For real-based disaster movies about things that shouldn't have happened, start with Titanic. Unsinkable...


Ah, I missed the may or might in your earlier post. Is it not just as possible that instead of "trouble" the greenhouse effect may result in increased prosperity worldwide?