Author Topic: Kalifornia has left the building (Read 1206 times)

lukster · « **on:** September 20, 2006, 06:04:34 PM »

This is easy to fix, no more cars sold to Kalifornia.

Calif. sues carmakers over global warming

http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=businessNews&storyID=2006-09-20T184628Z_01_N20199499_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-ENVIRONMENT-AUTOS-COL.XML&archived=False

I'm hoping the anti-religion ACLU will jump on this one. These fundamentalist wackos have gone off the deep end and are now using the government to push their religion on others.

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #1 on:** September 20, 2006, 06:14:39 PM »

The only good thing I can say for Lockyer is that he's not as bad as Perata. Buncha assclowns.

Jackal1 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 20, 2006, 06:15:19 PM »

Read that earlier.
Pure comedy gold.

Neubob · « **Reply #3 on:** September 20, 2006, 06:22:57 PM »

Lawyers should be practicing stand up comedy more often.

lukster · « **Reply #4 on:** September 20, 2006, 06:29:14 PM »

I guess they'll have to prove that co2 is responsible for global warming. Of course any Kalifornia court will swallow that as a given. Can a state be fined for pressing a frivolous suit?

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #5 on:** September 20, 2006, 09:38:49 PM »

Actually, lukster brings up a great idea. One which I had for Microsoft being ****ed out of europe. (At the time, Microsoft was being fined for not giving their code to other corporations so that the other companies could write Windows programs better).

I think a big ole' shove it up your ass, and then refuse to sell any cars or car parts in california would do them well. Shut down any plants in CA as well.

dmf · « **Reply #6 on:** September 20, 2006, 09:44:55 PM »

It it time to drop to only 49 states?

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #7 on:** September 20, 2006, 09:55:28 PM »

We could seclude CA and pick up all the states of mexico...

I think a lot of american entrepeneurs would go to mexico because of the opportunity no one has taken yet.

Vulcan · « **Reply #8 on:** September 20, 2006, 10:33:54 PM »

I'm confused, if there was liability wouldn't it be the actual drivers?

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #9 on:** September 20, 2006, 10:35:14 PM »

Nope, they always go for the deep pockets.

ujustdied · « **Reply #10 on:** September 20, 2006, 10:36:24 PM »

most people dont know but one valcano put more polution in the air then all the cars put together. if they want to know the real reason to global warming its because of natral couses.

Stang · « **Reply #11 on:** September 20, 2006, 10:56:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ujustdied
most people dont know but one valcano put more polution in the air then all the cars put together. if they want to know the real reason to global warming its because of natral couses.

Besides an occasional source, proper spelling and capital letters beginning sentences might help your argument.

dmf · « **Reply #12 on:** September 20, 2006, 11:10:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ujustdied
most people dont know but one valcano put more polution in the air then all the cars put together. if they want to know the real reason to global warming its because of natral couses.

He does have a point.

ramzey · « **Reply #13 on:** September 20, 2006, 11:26:41 PM »

why Boeing , General Dynamics, Lookheed, NASA, P&W are not on the list?

john9001 · « **Reply #14 on:** September 20, 2006, 11:43:20 PM »

it's bush's fault, he didn't sign the toyota treaty.