Mirages. Some F-1s, an occasional clip from what I assume is a Mirage 2000 variant. I've flown with and against some of those guys. I've flown that low once or twice, although I generally follow US training rules and keep to the 500' limit.
Some of that terrain reminds me of the big bend low level I used to fly in T-38s from Laughlin AFB... The entry to the low level route was one of those monolith-like features in the middle of the desert and there was plenty of interesting terrain to fly around/over/through.
We didn't video tape it though... Fast track to career stopper in the USAF especially after people get killed doing that same sort of thing. The USAF and American public would rather 100 of us die the first day of the war than 10 of us die in training, because low level flying is dangerous, period. If you train to "real" low level flying, you'll have an occasional training mishap. But if the first time you fly really low is in combat, you're guaranteed to have a lot of losses. We lost a couple of F-15E's in Desert Storm due to a lack of low level familarity, and that's because we lost a few F-111's and F-4s in training due to low level mishaps. What's worse? Training losses during realistic low-level tactical training, or real combat losses because nobody is allowed to train at levels that would be realistically required in real combat? The US and the French have arrived at polar opposite conclusions about that particular question...
