Author Topic: M26  (Read 535 times)

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
M26
« on: September 23, 2006, 06:33:24 AM »
Ive done somthing dangerouse, ive been reading...lol and in the book about ww2 american armor {deathtraps} the m26 is taunted as the replacment for the sherman, low velocity 90mm, pretty fast, sorry no pics...
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
M26
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2006, 07:07:59 AM »
feh... jump on the bandwagon why dont you.

this has been requested far too many times :mad:
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline viper215

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1076
      • http://www.bops.us
M26
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2006, 02:12:04 PM »
as stated in your other post

IS IT this

- Viper215 - Birds of Prey - Falcon Wing -
               - www.bops.us -

Offline SMIDSY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1248
M26
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2006, 11:17:27 PM »
bleh! i have two words: tank destroyers. they would fit in way better than another tank.

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
M26
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2006, 06:07:37 AM »
explain to me how a turretless hunk of armor that cannot traverse is better for gameplay,, oh yeh and the reason this has been asked for "far to many times" is because the game has {now get ready for this} NO American armor to speak of, no Sherman, no Grant, no firfly, no nothin...what we do have is an armord car freakishly armed with a gun more likly to get you spotted than kill anything....wow:(
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
M26
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2006, 07:29:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by stephen
oh yeh and the reason this has been asked for "far to many times" is because the game has {now get ready for this} NO American armor to speak of, no Sherman, no Grant, no firfly, no nothin...what we do have is an armord car freakishly armed with a gun more likly to get you spotted than kill anything....wow:(


I was actually joking because you double posted, check out what i said in your other thread.

Firefly was a British modification of an American tank.

America has the following vehicles in game, be nice to add to the other countries before they get anything else: -

Jeep
LVT(A)2
LVT(A)4
M-3
M-8
M-16
PT Boat
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline SMIDSY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1248
M26
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2006, 02:39:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by stephen
explain to me how a turretless hunk of armor that cannot traverse is better for gameplay,, oh yeh and the reason this has been asked for "far to many times" is because the game has {now get ready for this} NO American armor to speak of, no Sherman, no Grant, no firfly, no nothin...what we do have is an armord car freakishly armed with a gun more likly to get you spotted than kill anything....wow:(



no, you are thinking of assault guns, however that would be kinda cool. im talking about things such as the M-36 Jackson (see picture below).



or the M-18 Hellcat (fastest tracked vehicle of the war).




however, a StuG III would also be cool, despite its lack of turret.